Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 09/26/2016 View Sun 09/25/2016 View Sat 09/24/2016 View Fri 09/23/2016 View Thu 09/22/2016 View Wed 09/21/2016 View Tue 09/20/2016
1
2016-09-26 Home Front: Politix
New Black Panther Chairman: Hillary ‘Not The Great Champion Of African-Americans'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-26 05:01|| || Front Page|| [11129 views ]  Top

#1 The American people anxiously await your write-in candidate.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-26 05:07||   2016-09-26 05:07|| Front Page Top

#2 Just needing more of those SorosBucks...
Posted by CrazyFool 2016-09-26 08:46||   2016-09-26 08:46|| Front Page Top

#3 ...stating that neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump represent the interests of African-Americans.

Methinks Babu Omowale (that can't be his real name) hasn't figured out that, in an ideal world, you don't want the government or politicians 'representing your interests'.
Posted by Raj 2016-09-26 11:04||   2016-09-26 11:04|| Front Page Top

#4 America's first black president "has not done anything for the black community."

How can you say this Babu! IMO, Baraq did almost as much for 'black community' as Ulysses S. Grant
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-26 11:48||   2016-09-26 11:48|| Front Page Top

#5 Why link to Grant? Grant was good for African Americans while they have declined in every measurable category under Obama.

"President Ulysses S. Grant supported Radical Reconstruction and enforced the protection of African Americans in the South through the use of the Enforcement Acts passed by Congress. Grant suppressed the Ku Klux Klan, but was unable to resolve the escalating tensions inside the Republican party between the Carpetbaggers and the Scalawags (native whites in the South)."
Posted by rjschwarz 2016-09-26 12:12||   2016-09-26 12:12|| Front Page Top

#6 Because Jim Crow was a response to what's been going under the reconstruction, read your history - focus on "oath of allegiance". Just as what's coming is a response to what's been going under Obama.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-26 12:21||   2016-09-26 12:21|| Front Page Top

#7 Weren't blacks originally given the right to vote (under Grant??) but the Democrats removed that right when they later had control of congress?
Posted by CrazyFool 2016-09-26 12:21||   2016-09-26 12:21|| Front Page Top

#8 They were the only ones voting because voting required oath of allegiance to the Union. So, for a few years, former slaves ruled the South. Then, what Grant expected happened and whites started swearing. And once they had the power back, 100 years of Jim Crow.

p.s. You might look up "The original KKK"

pp.s. Why the f*ck an Israeli born in SovU have to lecture you Americans on your own history?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-26 12:30||   2016-09-26 12:30|| Front Page Top

#9 Can't we all just get along?
Posted by Raj 2016-09-26 12:39||   2016-09-26 12:39|| Front Page Top

#10 Why the f*ck an Israeli born in SovU have to lecture you Americans on your own history?

Because the U.S. public school system hasn't taught history - actual history and not the fairy tales they have today - for a very, very, long time. To my school post-civil war history was all about the carpetbaggers.
Posted by CrazyFool 2016-09-26 13:00||   2016-09-26 13:00|| Front Page Top

#11 It's the Zero year concept of socialism. Destroy the past, fabricate a future. See - Venezuela
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-09-26 13:50||   2016-09-26 13:50|| Front Page Top

#12 So the White Democrats figured out things while Grant was president and Grant in a democracy was unable to prevent Them. I don't see how that is Grant's fault. The situation of African Americans has gotten worse under Obama and it actually is his policies at fault. I don't see the connection and I think it's rather rude to go on the way you did over an honest question.
Posted by rjschwarz 2016-09-26 15:17||   2016-09-26 15:17|| Front Page Top

#13 You miss the point completely.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-26 15:21||   2016-09-26 15:21|| Front Page Top

#14 That's because you never made it clear what your point was.



Posted by JHH 2016-09-26 15:58||   2016-09-26 15:58|| Front Page Top

#15 "Everyone understands in his own way" - Vladimir Vysotsky.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-26 16:12||   2016-09-26 16:12|| Front Page Top

#16 if a black man has a couple grams of crack versus a white man having a couple of grams of powder cocaine
popularist background on the drug preference

Noteworthy origins Grom.
I enjoy the deflections.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-09-26 17:06||   2016-09-26 17:06|| Front Page Top

#17 g(r)omgoru "You miss the point completely."

Clearly, Which is why I asked, hoping for clarification, not pontification.
Posted by rjschwarz 2016-09-26 17:29||   2016-09-26 17:29|| Front Page Top

#18 Backlash: then & now.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-26 17:38||   2016-09-26 17:38|| Front Page Top

23:59 KBK
23:49 3dc
23:45 trailing wife
23:34 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:34 badanov
23:31 Alaska Paul
23:28 CrazyFool
23:15 Alaska Paul
23:00 trailing wife
22:55 Procopius2k
22:40 Blossom Unains5562
22:38 trailing wife
22:30 Blossom Unains5562
22:20 Blossom Unains5562
22:10 trailing wife
22:04 Frank G
22:00 Barbara
21:56 Barbara
21:54 Frank G
21:47 badanov
21:44 Blossom Unains5562
21:39 SteveS
21:33 james
21:14 swksvolFF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com