Article

2005-05-14 Home Front: WoT

Army to Offer Recruits Short Enlistment Option

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2005-05-14 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Dude, even the Soviets didn't shorten deployments THIS bad. (Theirs was two years.)

Me smells a bad idea, and the Army incorrectly attributes (I think) the problem to time ...

Posted by Edward Yee">Edward Yee 2005-05-14 01:01|| http://edwardyee.fanworks.net]">[http://edwardyee.fanworks.net] 2005-05-14 01:01|| Front Page Top

#2 I've read here at Rantburg that a significant number of troops who've spent time in Iraq or Afghanistan are re-upping because they feel the work they're doing is important. Could the Army be offering this short enlistment option as a way to put more people in the way of this seduction? Even if they aren't thinking in those terms, what are the odds that will be the result?

Posted by trailing wife 2005-05-14 07:47|| 2005-05-14 07:47|| Front Page Top

#3 Could be, TW. Part of the problem is self-imposed: we don't want to dilute our standards for recruits, especially given the sophistication of battle technology now. But that means that a fair number of potential enlistees don't make the cut.

My own take? Let women serve in more combat-related positions if/where they are really able to do the job. Which means push back on the jCongresscritters who want to block that from happening.

Also: recruiters report that an obstacle to enlisting black males is the Mom Factor, i.e. a political dislike of Bush &/or just wanting baby boy home. We need to counter that with more effort towards a pro-service atmosphere here at home.

Posted by too true 2005-05-14 07:54|| 2005-05-14 07:54|| Front Page Top

#4 Take a closer look."They will be offered the option of serving 15 months on active duty after completing their training".
Basic trainig:7.8 weeks for the Army(Marine Corps is a solid 90 days)+3-4 months AIT(advanced infantry training}.5 or 6 months of training+15 months on the line=21 months.After troops return from combat they have to spend about 3 months on duty to unwind(not sure if that's the right word)from the combat mind set and help in dealing with DSS.Total time on active duty 24 months,15 months in combat is a loooong time.

Posted by raptor 2005-05-14 09:37|| 2005-05-14 09:37|| Front Page Top

#5 Recruitment is tied to the economy, not the war. The high retention figures reflect that. So, should we scuttle the economy?
However the catch is that while its only 15 months of active up front, they are still on the hook for a total of eigth years. By the number of reserve call ups, a good chance to do more active time than you might think.

Posted by Elmilet Thavirong9735 2005-05-14 13:05|| 2005-05-14 13:05|| Front Page Top

23:53 .com
23:49 Ebbavith Angang9747
23:36 .com
23:35 Cromomble Glailet3736
23:34 phil_b
23:27 phil_b
23:26 Captain Pedantic
23:17 plato
23:16 Frank G
23:02 xbalanke
22:57 badanov
22:38 john
22:36 Frank G
22:22 Anonymoose
22:08 mhw
22:04 Old Patriot
22:02 mhw
21:51 GK
21:42 anymouse
21:40 john
21:31 Captain America
21:17 Atomic Conspiracy
21:15 Crose Whise2617
21:11 Captain America