Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 04/10/2006 View Sun 04/09/2006 View Sat 04/08/2006 View Fri 04/07/2006 View Thu 04/06/2006 View Wed 04/05/2006 View Tue 04/04/2006
1
2006-04-10 Arabia
Saoodis may join nuclear club
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2006-04-10 00:25|| || Front Page|| [8 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 "Saudi Arabia will not watch as its neighbors develop nuclear weapons"

Fine and dandy. Be sure to turn your heads when we blast the snot out of Iran.
Posted by Zenster 2006-04-10 10:57||   2006-04-10 10:57|| Front Page Top

#2 A close to ideal non-proliferation agreement could be reached with nuclear-coveting 3rd world countries: pebble bed reactors.

Simply put, pebble beds are ceramic balls with radioactive material mixed in. They lie on a floor with indentations in it, like hundreds of eggs in cartons. They need miminal technical support and give off a fixed amount of heat.

Advantages are that they are smaller power plants, cannot become supercritical or meltdown, and are built over a deep pit, so that when the balls are exhausted, they drop straight down for permanent disposal--no reprocessing needed.

Though they produce enough energy for commercial use, they do not produce enough to enrich plutonium, and no other weapons grade isotopes are produced in their use.

This solves one big problem: if a country says it wants nuclear power for peaceful uses, then pebble bed reactors are the way to go. If it wants weapons, then it wants more conventional reactors.

The technology for pebble beds is easier than conventional reactors, and China is planning to produces hundreds of them. So there really is no excuse, or effective pretense that the larger, more powerful reactors are needed.

In fact, if the Chinese are successful with their reactors, pebble beds would be much more economical for the US to use in the future, now that most of our nuclear plants are far beyond their projected useful lifespans. Practically speaking, a typical US State could have one or two, and the more populous States could have half a dozen each.
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-04-10 17:57||   2006-04-10 17:57|| Front Page Top

08:36 ARMYGUY
10:43 Icerigger
07:20 Aris Katsaris
09:04 ali
01:08 Maxamed deeq
23:47 JosephMendiola
23:47 Angeaper Cravick6952
23:31 JosephMendiola
23:30 Snolugum Glese3729
23:27 JosephMendiola
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:13 JDB
23:09 Crock Thrager2875
22:49 ed
22:49 USN Ret.
22:35 Thrish Elmiling4684
22:32 Frank G
22:23 Sgt. D.T.
22:20 crazyhorse
22:08 DMDF
22:07 Redneck Jim
22:05 Skidmark
22:00 Secret Master
21:55 Darrell









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com