Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 04/04/2006 View Mon 04/03/2006 View Sat 04/01/2006 View Fri 03/31/2006 View Thu 03/30/2006 View Wed 03/29/2006 View Tue 03/28/2006
1
2006-04-04 Home Front: WoT
6-3 ruling on the Padilla case
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2006-04-04 00:41|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 John Paul Stevens - Mysterious stranger in this case. Welcome to sanity, Mr Justice.
Posted by BigEd 2006-04-04 00:58||   2006-04-04 00:58|| Front Page Top

#2 No surprise here - as an alleged memeber of an organized minor group, as opposed to being a regular soldier in the armed forces of a trad or diplomatically recognized sovereign nation, the core issue is whether Mr. Padilla as a US citizen had permanently relinquished his citizenship when he fought agz US milfors in Afghanistan, and how long the Army can keep him in jail before transference to American civilian authorities. As an Amer citizen, and in the absence of a formal declaration of war against a sovereign power by the Congress, he must inevitably be transferred to US civilian authority. In any case, Padilla's is most likely jailmeat anyways becuz the Army is usually very thorough about sny investigation into the MILITARY/MIL-RELATED aspect of Padilla's conduct, i.e. will NOT release Padilla until Padilla gives up the ghost/full monty on his role and actions. Ironically, Padilla is lucky becuz iff he weren't a US citizen, the Army can poten hold him forever, until such time the Army is satisfied of his role and that he is no longer of any threat to the Amer people after his release - until then, only an act of Congress can release/waiver his butt.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-04-04 01:29||   2006-04-04 01:29|| Front Page Top

#3 Wouldn't you think 5-4 is sharply split?
Posted by Danking70 2006-04-04 02:34||   2006-04-04 02:34|| Front Page Top

#4 BULLLL,the guy is a traitor,he should be given a fair trial,stood aginst a wall and shot.End of story!
Posted by raptor 2006-04-04 07:54||   2006-04-04 07:54|| Front Page Top

#5 IMHO, give him a trial then hang him for treason.
Posted by djohn66 2006-04-04 08:12||   2006-04-04 08:12|| Front Page Top

#6 Wishfull thinking. GWB and the Pubs are wringing their hands cause they fear the pain of staged outrage over executing the traitor. Just announce the time and place of the dude's release and let the public [sort of] vote.
Posted by Grineting Ebbemp3101 2006-04-04 08:57||   2006-04-04 08:57|| Front Page Top

#7 this "news article" reads like a snarky blog post rather than news.

Sharply split,
Six justices were apparently persuaded, at least for the time being

*snicker* As the bloggers get better at reporting, the reporters get worse.
Posted by 2b 2006-04-04 11:17||   2006-04-04 11:17|| Front Page Top

16:52 Elmash Phing8221
16:11 Elmash Phing8221
13:58 Elmash Phing8221
13:44 Elmash Phing8221
13:11 Elmash Phing8221
00:03 JosephMendiola
23:59 Frank G
23:51 JosephMendiola
23:48 Old Patriot
23:45 FOTSGreg
23:39 Oldspook
23:37 DMFD
23:36 JosephMendiola
23:32 JosephMendiola
23:32 Steve White
23:30 Oztrailan
23:24 RWV
23:24 Oldspook
23:22 trailing wife
23:17 FOTSGreg
23:11 DMFD
23:02 twobyfour
23:00 trailing wife
22:54 twobyfour









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com