Reminder - Swedish scientist says humans should become cannibals to fight climate change because eating human flesh is more 'sustainable' than the meat industryhttps://t.co/ZlcrDwuOuh
#9
NOW meat = old and fatty
Teefa meat = stringy, raised using chemicals
BLM meat = just don't taste right.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
07/26/2022 12:57 Comments ||
Top||
#10
Af-ghan meats! Get yore treats!
Fresh in from the Kaa-bool!
Tight, soft, juicey, all kinds
of af-ghan meats! Steaks,T-bone,
fillets, pash-toon man teats!
Everybody get some meats!
#11
“I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee, or a ragout.” --Jonathon Swift's A Modest Proposal(1729)
Centuries later the Swedish 'Scientist' (scare quotes intentional) comes across as far less witty . Jonathon Swift was satirizing English policies in Ireland while the Professor just sounds daft.
#3
Services and benefits paid for by US taxpayers! Benefits to illegal alien entrants to our country, because invading my country has earned them the largess of our nation, as a tribute to our national cowardice to treat them as the thieves they are and send them packing.
[Right Scoop] Here we go again. Thanks to multiple whistleblowers within the FBI who are said to be ’highly credible’, we now know that the FBI tried to discredit the negative and probably criminal information about Joe’s son Hunter Biden leading up to the election in 2020.
Here’s the report via Catherine Herridge:
Highly credible" whistleblowers have come forward to a senior Senate Republican alleging a widespread effort within the FBI to downplay or discredit negative information about President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, according to letters reviewed by CBS News.
"The information provided to my office involves concerns about the FBI’s receipt and use of derogatory information relating to Hunter Biden, and the FBI’s false portrayal of acquired evidence as disinformation," GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley wrote FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland on July 25. "The volume and consistency of these allegations substantiate their credibility and necessitate this letter."
#2
The wife of As of US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Lynn, advises government and nonprofit groups on voting systems security and accuracy issues (aka "the fix is in" regarding election fraud prosecution...).
President Barack Obama, a Democrat, nominated Garland to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court in March 2016 to fill the vacancy created by the death of Antonin Scalia. However, the Republican Senate majority refused to hold a hearing or vote on his nomination. The unprecedented refusal of a Senate majority to consider the nomination was highly controversial. Garland's nomination lasted 293 days (the longest to date by far), and it expired on January 3. Wikipedia
#3
President Eisenhower provided an ominous warning in his departure speech. No intention of going 'Alex Jones' on everyone, but I fear all of this mischief may precede the onerous Clinton's and Barak Obama by a number of years. Hopefully we are not approaching a disastrous culminating event.
#10
No intention of going 'Alex Jones' on everyone, but I fear all of this mischief may precede the onerous Clinton's and Barak Obama by a number of years.
I'm guessing it goes all the way back to JFK's assassination.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
07/26/2022 11:52 Comments ||
Top||
#11
The Nixon/Ford and Reagan administrations were brief interludes as was Trump's. Remember how Democrats and their media allies hated those guys? Notice how I did not include the Bushes?
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
07/26/2022 11:54 Comments ||
Top||
#12
The ability to fire anyone in the government, no questions asked, should be enshrined in the Constitution next opportunity.
They should all be required to submit their resignations at the beginning of each new administration. Further, all department heads of all federal departments and agencies should be required to submit a detailed justification for their department's continued existence to Congress and Congress should be required to approve said continued existence by a two-thirds majority vote.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
07/26/2022 11:58 Comments ||
Top||
#13
The solution to the impossible Civil Service careerism problem is actually already enshrined in past government practice. Firing a career federal employee is a virtually impossible task, ask anyone who has plumbed the Civil Service Commission Regulatory Waters. They did away with the grades of GS16-18, making them the SES (Senior Exsecutive Service) supposedly a position that can be managed and removed. But below that, its a true ordeal to remove even the most inferior civil servant, God forbid a minority of any stripe. So the GS9-15 managers and staff exercise an enormous amount of policy and implementation power for every aspect of government functioning, making them the bedrock of the woke, Deep State in recent years. They can thwart conservative policies with a myriad of bureaucratic and diversionary tactics, studies, evaluations...etc.
Now, consider if you split away Management authority from rank/pay/benefits. Remember the Army Tech-5 of WWII? Paid as a Sergeant E-5, but having no NCO/command authority! You take a non-performing civil servant GS-13 and you take away management decision making, but no adverse financial or career impact. Hurt feelings, but no discernible adverse effect. You just remove them from the decision tree, not their career. Harder to claim any impact except hurt feelings and perhaps an earned reputation as an obstructionist.
Easier than getting a new civil service system at least.
#14
Cap pensions and use a formula to actually reduce pension accrual for each month of service beyond an approved ceiling.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
07/26/2022 15:33 Comments ||
Top||
#15
The President should get 25 and each Secretary 20 and each Department head 15 no questions asked firings each year. Just like lawyers on each side get one free 'throw them off the jury' challenge in courts.
[Right Scoop] Al Gore did an interview for Meet the Press tomorrow and they put out some preview clips, and in one of them the fake green giant used the massacre of children in a Uvalde elementary school as a toss-away metaphor for "climate denial."
If you think it sounds disgusting by my description, just watch it for yourself and see how truly heinous this is. And yes, as you can imagine, nobody in the media has blinked twice about it.
"The one thing that Senator Manchin said that I really agree with is that, ’If we want more pro-climate policies, we need to elect more pro-climate senators and representatives in both parties.’ And we’ve got an election coming up. And this is time for all of us to step up" said Gore in the lead-up to the comment. He was answering Chuck Todd asking him about America being a leader in getting rid of "fossil fuels."
Then he made the disgusting comparison.
"You know, the climate deniers are really in some ways similar to all of those almost 400 law enforcement officers in Uvalde, Texas, who were waiting outside an unlocked door while the children were being massacred. They heard the screams, they heard the gunshots, and nobody stepped forward. And God bless those families who’ve suffered so much. And law enforcement officials tell us that’s not typical of what law enforcement usually does. And confronted with this global emergency, what we’re doing with our inaction and failing to walk through the door and stop the killing is not typical of what we are capable of as human beings. We do have the solutions. And I think these extreme events that are getting steadily worse and more severe are really beginning to change minds."
#3
Gore seeing News worth events have interfered with his
Climate________$$$$$$$ flow. He seeks to associate his
Climate _______ with anything in the news spotlight.
Just like we see other Liberal Has-Been Hollywood
types do, when trying to rekindle some type past fame
and interest.
BTW: What is the count now? For items that Gore claims were caused or happened due to his often cited Climate Doomsday (suspiciously always in the 10+ year future) predictions.
[Breitbart via Right Scoop] Liz Cheney is apparently considering running for president in 2024. She was asked about it yesterday by Jake Tapper and she suggested she’s considering it:
Via Breitbart:
Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) said Sunday on CNN’s "State of the Union" that she would make a decision about running for president in 2024 "down the road."
Anchor Jake Tapper said, "You’ve made it clear you don’t think Donald Trump shouldn’t be trusted with the presidency again. Are you willing to run for president to try to stop him? At least in part?"
Cheney said, "I haven’t really at this point. I’ve not made a decision about 2024. I am really very focused on the substance of what we have to do on the select committee. Very focus on the work that I have to do to represent the people of Wyoming. I’ll make a decision about 2024 down the road."
She added, "But I do think as we look towards the next presidential election, as I said, I believe that our nation stands on the edge of an abyss. I do believe that we all have to really think very seriously about the dangers we face in the threats we face and we have to elect serious candidates. We’ve got to look people who will take their obligations and their oath seriously and who will deal with issues of substance with respect for people who have disagreements. And we’ve got to be able to come together and stop the very dangerous kind of politics we have lived through over the last year and a half certainly."
I can’t think of someone with less of a chance to win a presidential election.
If she runs in the Republican primary she’ll get destroyed. If she runs in the Democratic primary most Democrats will think she’s a DINO and won’t trust her.
The only think of consequence she could do is play the spoiler by running as an independent, and she might not even be able to do that. But I suspect if she does run, that’s what she’ll do because she hates Trump.
#6
Well, why not? It's not as if you need the support of the people to win elections nowadays. You only need the support of the ones that count the votes.
#8
I'm thinking of running for President in 2024 as well. She has a better chance of winning than I do, but only because more people have heard of her. She'll probably flame out after Iowa. If she gets that far.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia ||
07/26/2022 11:14 Comments ||
Top||
#9
At some point, a person running in the presidential primaries is going to be lynched. Won't say who, or even which party, as that violates site guidelines.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
07/26/2022 11:16 Comments ||
Top||
#10
She will serve as a well funded tool for the Democrats. The media will cover her every word. This will not be a good thing for Republicans. The best thing for Republicans is to kick her out of the party the day after her primary loss. Don't allow her to carry the party banner.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] 
[Right Scoop] Here we go again. Thanks to multiple whistleblowers within the FBI who are said to be ’highly credible’, we now know that the FBI tried to discredit the negative and probably criminal information about Joe’s son Hunter Biden leading up to the election in 2020.
