[Daily Caller] Fox News host Bill O'Reilly called for an FBI investigation into the allegations surrounding foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation on "The Five" Tuesday, saying the country would be "doomed" if the presidency could be bought in such a way.
"So what has to happen -- and this has to happen -- is the FBI has to look into this to preserve the sanctity of the electoral process," he said. "Because nobody is going to find the truth. The investigative reporters will find a little bit, but we don't have subpoena power. We can't subpoena."
"And because this is a presidential election issue now, the FBI has to go in," O'Reilly continued. "...They have no choice. They have to investigate this." Bill, Bill, Bill.... PLEASE take a moment now and then and scan the Burg. At a minimum, get some new Blue Room analysts.
Host Eric Bolling suggested the Internal Revenue Service could investigate, but O'Reilly dismissed the idea. "The IRS, its been corrupted. We know that. It's politicized; people who run it take orders from whoever is in power."
Don't be absurd, Mr. O'Reilly -- they interpret directions in light of the zeitgeist when Democrats are running things, and do their best to hold the line when Republicans are on charge.
#2
The criminal or felony bypass + circumvention = "sanctity" of the electoral process, thus by extension the US Constitution itself, was what the Monica Lewinsky affair + Bill Clinton's impeachment was covertly truly about.
FROM NO LESS AN AUTHORITY THAN POTUS BILL HIMSELF.
#6
Obviously, you missed the bus Bill. It's an oligarchy. Denial is not a river in Egypt. However, they need to keep the rubes compliant, so help them by not stating the obvious.
#7
The Clintons do believe you can buy the presidency. Bill [O'Reilly}, you should read, if you haven't, the recent book about the gnawing away and destruction of a Republic from within by Peter Schweizer entitled "Clinton Cash." It is about a power couple who feel they are entitled but immune from the laws for the rest of us little people.
#8
Do I get a Master of the Obvious award if I point out to Mr. O'Reilly that the FBI will never investigate as long as the DOJ is in the hands of the crooks?
#9
Is he really that naive? This administration has used subpoena as toilet paper for years to avoid tough questions. Bill should use his bully pulpit to get every one of his viewers to vote against Hillary no matter how imperfect the Republican candidate is on this or that issue. That is the only way we'll see an investigation. And judging by past performance that may not even be enough because the Republicans love to play nice with those that have declared them evil and lied and vilified them for decades.
#11
Rj nailed it. Watsmore, they're all quietly sitting back and wondering if she will indeed win, and upset their individual carts in spite and retribution. A blindly flash of course, but these people can be very, very vindictive.
#12
Buy it, hell folks, they are importing permanent one party rule as we speak (soon to be in Spanish) and nothing, not a Goddam F*cking thing is being done to stop it. They are't going to buy it, you are, your tax dollars as entitlements will pay these imported low skill, low education imports to vote democrat as if their checks depended on it, which they will!
[Daily Caller] CNN chief national correspondent John King said on "New Day" that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's horrible poll numbers on trustworthiness and honesty are the equivalent of a "fire-alarm fire" that her campaign needs to address.
"Clearly, we're seeing a candidate who right now isn't showing us transparency, accountability, or a high level of ethical standards," said National Journal editor Ron Fournier. "Those are things we should be factoring in as well. Especially reporters... the polls go her way, that doesn't necessarily mean we should stop reporting on it."
"And the Clinton people shouldn't take solace in these polls, because they haven't gotten beyond those fundamental questions of leadership," he concluded.
#2
Well, they can run on the campaign slogan - Vote for the Crook.
That'll cover for at least 25% of the electorate. Hey, when she and other were mouthing redistribution just who do you think were going to get the redistribution?
Posted by: Matt ||
05/07/2015 8:59 Comments ||
Top||
#4
The left and that includes the MSM such as CNN still have that attitude that she in the "inevitable candidate" who is entitled to the presidency. They are merely biding their time and waiting for the coronation of Queen Hillary--carrying water for her when they can. IMO that the Clintons are awful and ruthless people who should never be near the seats of power. I wouldn't mind so much if they were terrible, awful, ruthless people towards our enemies but often times it is directed towards the American people (Waco). They are strictly in it for themselves. Hillary is bytch on steroids from what rumors I've heard from people whom I know in the LE community.
America needs someone who can deceive without a conscience.
Vote Hillary because Honesty: What is it good for?
Posted by: lord garth ||
05/07/2015 11:05 Comments ||
Top||
#7
Given that Democrat voters don't need to go to the poles to cast votes, this is a non issue. All the necessary Democrat votes will be there on election day. The party makes sure it is so.
#8
American needs a black President, so we elect Obama and he bungles things so badly we guarantee he's the last black President for a long, long time.
America needs a female President...
Perhaps folks should think that through a bit longer.
#9
rjschwarz, I'm afraid that many of the people who voted for the first black or will vote for the first woman are like the high school students who think it would be cool to vote for a dog or pig for homecoming king or queen. It just that kind of mentality--no thinking involved.
#10
Makes no difference. Hillary will be the closest to the middle politically of all democratic challengers. The DNC might even run Fidel Castro to make their point that Hillary is not a 'leftist'.
[Daily Caller] Are art museums welcoming enough to minorities? While it's probably a question that never occurred to you since, if you are so inclined, you simply pay the admission and enter, it it apparently a pressing issue to some people. Photograph of the family at the right from the many on display at the museum in Appomattox.
One of those people to whom this though has occurred is first lady Michelle Obama.
At the opening of the new $420 million Whitney Museum in New York City, the first lady spoke of a "feeling of not belonging" in museums when she was a growing up on the south side of Chicago.
"You see, there are so many kids in this country who look at places like museums and concert halls and other cultural centers and they think to themselves, 'well, that's not a place for me, for someone who looks like me, for someone who comes from my neighborhood.' In fact, I guarantee you that right now, there are kids living less than a mile from here who would never in a million years dream that they would be welcome in this museum.
And growing up on the South Side of Chicago, I was one of those kids myself. So I know that feeling of not belonging in a place like this. And today, as First Lady, I know how that feeling limits the horizons of far too many of our young people."
#3
She's just like The Once. Everything is about her.
Posted by: Deacon Blues ||
05/07/2015 8:44 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Visit to the Museum of Science & Industry in Chicago and tell me how well behaved the neighborhood 'yoots' are in and around the exhibits, please. These kids were never taught to respect the rights and properties of others.
Any Art Museum display in that particular area would have to be heavily secured to a wall or column and bulletproof.
Posted by: Mullah Richard ||
05/07/2015 8:46 Comments ||
Top||
#5
Oh, really? If they never went any place they weren't welcome, they sure wouldn't be at the mall.
Posted by: ed in texas ||
05/07/2015 8:54 Comments ||
Top||
#6
Remember Asians are the new 'whites' and do not qualify as a minority.
#8
Stirring up trouble where none exists. Maybe FLOTUS should go see a therapist about these feelings. "Normal or nuts?" I'm going with nuts. She is a similar to the former erstwhile FLOTUS, Hillary.
#10
Could it be that museums are generally where you need at least a rudimentary ability to read reason and a background education of basic history and science? The things there connect with those and expand on them unless you don't have them. Then they are just annoying buildings full of the proof of white privilege.
Basically she is saying feelings of persecution and being an outsider are self-ingrained in blacks. Long after the "White's Only" signs were thrown away they have a lingering effect.
MLK would cry to hear such a thing. He'd encourage far more field trips (and proper behavior) to encourage young blacks to erase that nonsense from their heads.
#15
Ah... Mrs. First Lady Ma'am. Have you ever walked the first six or so blocks of San Francisco's Mission Street before? The one with the dozen or so museums dedicated to minority groups on it? No? Does that not fit the narrative?
#16
Same shit, different day. Why does anyone invite her to anything to hear the same old spiel?
But maybe she was just afraid none of the museums doors were wide enough for her gigantic ass to get through them...
#20
First Cultural Commissar Michelle Obama,
Wanting the welcome for waifs to be warmer,
Invited them in with torch, sickle, and hammer
To serve as exhibits in her Wunderkammer.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.