A note to Goodluck: please do not post large images in the comments. They mess with our formatting. Plus, these images have links back to sources that could (potentially) get us into copyright trouble.
I've deleted several from the comments this morning. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
#1
In general, it's also rue to the people posting the image. They're paying for the bandwidth, and they get almost nothing for it from Rantburg readers.
Posted by: Eric Jablow ||
09/19/2010 11:12 Comments ||
Top||
Since passage in 1993 of the National Voter Registration Act - aka "Motor Voter" - by the Democratic Congress that led to the 1994 GOP takeover, ACORN and a bunch of other radical liberal activists groups, many financed by George Soros, have been steadily growing their ability to increase vote counts for their candidates by stuffing ballot boxes with illegal votes on election day.
To get just a taste of how deeply devious the Left's tactics are in subverting elections, check out this report by Leo Vaquez, the Harris County, Texas, Voter Registrar. Here's a partial list from that report of the many ways one leftist group, Houston Votes, has tried to register thousands of illegal voters in recent months:
Houston Votes has turned in 25,640 applications.
Houston Votes applications have generated 7,193 "new" voter records.
Houston Votes applications have generated 3,531 applications which were rejected by the SOS for failure to match TDL/SSN.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred ||
09/19/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[4 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Has anyone else noticed that the United States started goint to hell in 1993 when Clinton was elected president? And we've never recovered. The US is almost unrecognizable to me today.
Posted by: Black Charlie Chinemble5313 ||
09/19/2010 1:18 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Oops, that would be going to hell.
Posted by: Black Charlie Chinemble5313 ||
09/19/2010 1:32 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Majority media's narrative: Bush "stole" the 2004 election. Reality: nothing of the sort.
Majority media's attention to the genuine, widespread, fraud undertaken by the Democrats for years and through serial elections: nothing.
And these shameless and duplicitous arseholes have the cheek to also push the line that the minority neutral media is biased.
#4
Recently, analysis of voter rolls and castings in Minnesota showed that unqualified felons probably turned the election. The Secretary of State (D) in New Mexico wants to make sure that such nasty truths don't come out in her state.
#6
One only has to look at the Washington State Governor election a few years ago (04?) where they kept re-counting (and finding ballots) until the democrat won.
#7
These statistics are just for Houston. When you start considering blue state cities such as Chicago, Boston, Washington, D.C., Detroit, San Francisco, Lost Angeles, Philadelphia, etc. there is a real problem of a vast left wing conspiracy to manipulate votes and to engage in systematic voter fraud.
How do we insure our elections aren't like Afghanistan, Zimbabwee, Somali, etc.? This is a huge threat to the freedoms of the U.S.
#8
Let's cut through the mythology of Posse Commitatus. It was passed at the end of Reconstruction not to protect the citizens liberty, but rather to remove the hated bluebelly who stood watch at election stations in the south that insured blacks could exercise their rights under the 15th Amendment to vote. Once the troops left, blacks lost their rights and votes for nearly a hundred years. Remember its not who votes which counts, but who counts the votes. However, keep the pressure up and keep the spot light on and soon a enough Americans will realize that the government is no longer legitimate. Once that sense takes hold, all the efforts and all the machinations to get the power will only result in its dissolution. Someone mentioned that Americans were ungovernable. To a certain extent he was right. Too many refuse to be ruled. Americans can be lead, and mislead, but only for so long as they 'believe'. Once you kill that belief in the vision or legitimacy, it all comes tumbling down to a sorry ineffective inefficient graft laden world in which the people 'in power' are fighting over a carcass. Then someone will step forward to fill the power vacuum.
#9
Systematic voting fraud is the main issue. Remember fraud does not have to occur in every state, just in the closely-contested ones &/or the ones with an infrastructure which has been successful at fraud in the past (i.e., Illinois). If voting is lopsided, fraud is a bit harder to pull off. it all comes tumbling down to a sorry ineffective inefficient graft laden world in which the people 'in power' are fighting over a carcass. Then someone will step forward to fill the power vacuum. That may not mean what you think it does. Our financial oligarchy is making out like the bandits they are. Our economy is inefficient and graft-laden, but the carcass is still extremely valuable, and there is no power vacuum.
#11
Our economy is inefficient and graft-laden, but the carcass is still extremely valuable, and there is no power vacuum.
Oh really. They're getting close in California. The interesting part is when mobility is constricted and you become simply a tax serf tied to either physical or virtual land of the lord. That's when, as the Chinese would say, you'll live in interesting times.
#13
Remember fraud does not have to occur in every state, just in the closely-contested ones &/or the ones with an infrastructure which has been successful at fraud in the past
Or a state with a significant number of Electoral College votes.
[Bangla Daily Star] US President Barack B.O. Obama yesterday accused Republicans of blocking stricter campaign finance rules he believes are necessary after a Supreme Court ruling lifting caps on corporate donations.
Oddly enough, the Republicans do not believe as he does, which is why they are blocking the president's latest desire. I do realize such a difference of opinion is inconceivable to the dear man, but nonetheless it is so.
Obama's criticism came six weeks ahead of legislative elections that will determine how much room for political maneuver the president will have in the second half of his four-year term.
Think how much he'll complain then, if we hear this much when his party controls both Houses of Congress and the presidency.
In a decision announced on January 21, the US Supreme Court said that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in elections could not be limited under the First Amendment to the constitution.
"Now, as an election approaches, it's not just a theory," the president said. "We can see for ourselves how destructive to our democracy this can become. We see it in the flood of deceptive attack ads sponsored by special interests using front groups with misleading names."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred ||
09/19/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[7 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Funny how they only want require disclosure by Corporations. Not Unions, or Environmental groups, or any of the multitude of Soros funded groups.
This wouldn't be too bad of bad idea - if *everyone* had to disclose their 'root' funding. But they only want *their* special interest groups to have a say.
The White House is attempting to cling on to Democratic control of Washington by portraying an Ohio congressman who grew up in near poverty as an elitist country club Republican controlled by wealthy lobbyists.
Posted by: Fred ||
09/19/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[2 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
wow, he's a "person of colour (tan)", smokes and plays golf. The bastard!
perhaps Preznit Dipshit could look in the mirror before he steps in it any deeper
Posted by: Frank G ||
09/19/2010 10:38 Comments ||
Top||
#2
On the I-75 freeway outside Cincinnati, a huge poster showing a tanned Mr Boehner playing golf accuses him of teeing off 119 times in a year.
119 times he teed off? That would be about 10, eighteen hole golf games. Less than one per month. If the data is factual, that would mean some donk operative is following after Boehner trying to dig up dirt.
BTW How you do'in Mr. Obama how are you and the Mrs. enjoying the taxpayer's money?
How many of those games were work-related? An awful lot of decisions happen during golf games and business dinners. One segment of the capital-F Feminists have waxed exceedingly indignant over that fact over the years.
A video showing protesters outside an Americans For Prosperity event has surfaced on the internet. It shows the protestors with signs depicting Sarah Palin and Glenn beck with Hitler mustaches and the label "Naz-Tea Party" over their pictures. Also depicted as Hitler is GOP candidate Adam Kinzinger running against Rep. Debbie Halvorson (IL-D) in the 11th District in Illinois.
This is my district. This occurred in Joliet which is just a little west of where I live. Had I known I would have been there with a video-cam myself.
As protests go, it's a bit limp and poorly attended, but the offensive and inflammatory signs certainly grab your attention. What makes this video so compelling is what it shows after the protest.
Once the scene breaks up, a handful of the protesters, including one gentleman in a striped shirt who is earlier seen leading the group in a chant, walk two blocks away and enter a well-lit office. So well-lit that you can see them chatting and you can clearly make out their faces as the same people who had just participated in the protest.
Posted by: Fred ||
09/19/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[14 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Bill Clinton is on Face the Nation this a.m. He referred to the Tea Party as an "insurgency." WTF? Insurgency is used to refer to jihadist, Mohammedans, islamicists, etc.---People who kill and blow up things.
#2
Thought Bill Clinton's definition of Insurgency was: The act of placing your unit into a warm place, even while under the Oval Office table, since it has never had such refuge in 20 years.
Posted by: Jack Salami ||
09/19/2010 11:12 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Their name calling is getting diminishing returns.
"RACIST", "KKK", "NAZI", "FASCIST", and "HITLER" just isn't getting the same bang for the buck anymore.
Particularly when people point out, with proof, that those terms apply more to the Democratic Party than Conservatives.
1: the quality or state of being insurgent; specifically : a condition of revolt against a government that is less than an organized revolution and that is not recognized as belligerency
Sounds about right to me at this point.
Posted by: Black Charlie Chinemble5313 ||
09/19/2010 14:14 Comments ||
Top||
#5
Definition of REVOLT
1: a renouncing of allegiance (as to a government or party); especially : a determined armed uprising
2: a movement or expression of vigorous dissent
Posted by: Black Charlie Chinemble5313 ||
09/19/2010 14:20 Comments ||
Top||
#6
Saw where O'Donnell supposedly appeared on the weazel Bill Maher show in 1999. Bob Schieffer on CBSNew's Face the Nation showed a clip from 1999 where O'Donnell mentioned something about witchcraft. Schieffer seemed a little embarassed to mention this. Maher was probably ecstatic to find this in the archives. The comment by O'Donnell seemed innocent enough and taken out of context. Probably she was dressed up as a witch when she was 6 years old on Halloween or some B.S. such as that. Mrs. John QC said the donks are desperate if that's all they got.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
Since passage in 1993 of the National Voter Registration Act - aka "Motor Voter" - by the Democratic Congress that led to the 1994 GOP takeover, ACORN and a bunch of other radical liberal activists groups, many financed by George Soros, have been steadily growing their ability to increase vote counts for their candidates by stuffing ballot boxes with illegal votes on election day.
