[Breitbart] A key revelation in the report released last week by the Justice Department’s inspector general raises questions about the roles played by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Susan Rice and other senior members of the Obama administration in disgraced former FBI Director James Comey’s infamous classified briefing to then President-elect Donald Trump about "salacious" material inside the anti-Trump dossier.
"Raises questions" for some possibly. Confirms suspicions for millions of others.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
09/04/2019 10:16 Comments ||
Top||
#3
The onion is peeling back to reveal Champ and clueless Joe knew, and ValJar, Lynch, Rice Hildabeest were undoubtedly aware....the cancer that was the nucleus of the now openly insane Democrat party!!!
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 9:41 Comments ||
Top||
#3
That was a tough one...because, yeah.
Anti-social media. All that stuff is modern adult imaginary friend stuff. It was incredible to me this summer, all the people walking about talking to their particular Harvey.
#2
Got some rain. Got some wind. Electricity was off when it was sleepy time anyway. Will have to clean up the yard. House and vehicle undamaged. I know exactly what I will do to prepare for the ones to come without spending two days doing it. Thankful, not cocky.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 7:37 Comments ||
Top||
#3
a good chance that the eye wall will skim the NC coast
even possible the eye will move up the channel between the NC barrier Islands and the NC mainland
that scenario would result in some horrible storm surge
Posted by: lord garth ||
09/04/2019 15:01 Comments ||
Top||
[The Hill] Chicago Mayor Lori "Groot" Lightfoot (D) took aim at GOP Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas) after the lawmaker said a weekend uptick in violence in the city proved that "gun control doesn’t work."
"60% of illegal firearms recovered in Chicago come from outside IL ‐ mostly from states dominated by coward Republicans like you who refuse to enact commonsense gun legislation," Lightfoot tweeted late Monday. "Keep our name out of your mouth."
Lightfoot also tweeted a graph showing the top 10 source states of recovered firearms in Chicago between 2013 and 2016. Only about 40 percent came from Illinois, with the rest coming from states such as Indiana, Mississippi and Cruz’s state of Texas.
Cruz tweeted in the aftermath of a deadly shooting in Odessa, Texas, on Saturday ‐ and after 37 people were reportedly shot in Chicago over the Labor Day weekend ‐ that gun control isn’t going to reduce violence.
"Gun control doesn’t work. Look at Chicago," he tweeted on Monday. "Disarming law-abiding citizens isn’t the answer. Stopping violent criminals‐prosecuting & getting them off the street‐BEFORE they commit more violent crimes is the most effective way to reduce murder rates. Let’s protect our citizens."
#3
For drug dealers who can read, this Lake County effort should help end the violence and keep everyone within their respective sales districts.
Daily Herald:Internally illuminated street signs, like these at the corner of St. William Drive and Butterfield Road in Libertyville, are becoming more popular in Lake County.
#7
It's not about guns, it's about ignoring the facts and continuing to look the other way. I'd liken it to Atlanta I-285 'notional' speed limits for entitlement motorists. The entire beltway is ringed with FMV (Full Motion Video) cams and 24x7 monitoring, but few are held accountable.
#8
Urbanism is instutionalized degeneracy. If you have to work in a city that's one thing. If you choose to live there that's something else. People who talk about putting lipstick on a pig have obviously never tried that. The pig won't hold still and it just wants to eat the lipstick and the fingers holding the tube...
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 9:17 Comments ||
Top||
#10
Obama invoked executive to cover up Fast & Furious and get his AG Holder off the hook. Sheryl Attkisson said she had sources who said F & F operated in at least 10 U.S. cities. It is also said that once guns were sold under this program there was no effort made to track them. Where half of the guns ended up is unknown. Maybe the F & F program should get another look. Check with El Chapo if he is willing to talk; he might fear he will get Epsteined.
#12
A friend of mine (bohemian/beatnik type, in his 70's, originally from Chitown) said when I asked him how he would take away the weapons from gangs "I'm sure if you talked to them, they would comply"..and he was serious.
#15
Actually, Atlanta and it's rail yards and stores (for obvious logistical reasons) were in ashes before the General arrived. But you are correct, that didn't help either. As the late author Shelby Foote was quoted as saying, "the South never had a chance."
#16
Easier to damn a symptom than resolve the root cause. "Guns cause violence, let's control them" rather than "Violence is inherent in the culture that we can't control."
Spread this site far and wide. It shows the depth of Chicago's problem. Dominated by Democrats since, the 50s or 60s?
Posted by: Herb McCoy ||
09/04/2019 12:01 Comments ||
Top||
#18
It all goes back to the border. Secure the border, stop the flow of illegal narcotics and the gangs won't have any merchandise to sell. If they have no merchandise, they'll have no reason to fight about who can sell what and where they can sell it. They might have to go legit. But, hey, Lightfoot and Nancy need their cuts of the action.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
09/04/2019 12:11 Comments ||
Top||
#19
It's hard to be sure which part of "civic pride" is the worst. Pride is dumb in many cases, but the entire concept of civic is a sucker play.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 12:17 Comments ||
Top||
#20
"60% of illegal firearms recovered in Chicago come from outside IL
Same with groceries and consumer goods, I'll wager.
In addition to heyjackass.com, Second City Cop is a good source of inside info on the 'workings' of Chicago.
#24
The only way you'll ever clean up Chicago is to start by getting every politician and appointed official in the city in prison. The crimes are there, it will just take an interestes FBI and federal prosecutor.
After the pols are locked up, keep an eye on their replacements and start executing the street gangs.
Posted by: Rob Crawford ||
09/04/2019 18:28 Comments ||
Top||
#25
"Show me the man, and I'll give you the crime!" Lavrenti Beria, 1932
[Breitbart] Mayor Pete Buttigieg does not appear to have engaged in combat during his six months deployed in Afghanistan, despite months of ignoring multiple media requests about the issue, including from Breitbart News. "But I saw a lot of action, IYKWIMAITYD"
The South Bend mayor spoke about his deployment during an interview with military news website Task and Purpose.
When asked if he considered himself a combat veteran, he replied, "Some say you are a combat veteran if you have a Combat Action Ribbon (I do not). Others say deploying to a combat zone makes you one. I simply consider myself a veteran, and I’ll leave it to others to decide what else to call it."
The Combat Action Ribbon (CAR) is awarded to members of the Navy or the Marine Corps who have actively participated in ground or surface combat.
Buttigieg added that his job was never intended to be a combat role, although he frequently drove or guarded military vehicles "outside the wire" of the military base.
According to his count, he traveled 119 times outside the wire.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 7:22 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Lee Harvey Oswald served. Charles Whitman served. It's a mixed bag like everything else in this world. Trying to make it seem magical cheapens it.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 7:28 Comments ||
Top||
#5
By definition CinC is serving. Truman killed more enemy in two days than lots of flag officers did.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 7:30 Comments ||
Top||
#6
Right on, Murcek.
Besides that rifle and the shades aren't fooling nobody. He was probably the most anal retentive fobbit squealer in the ranks. Maybe he picked up the habit of buttgiggery right there in Afghanistan.
#7
Look, I'm sure what I said above has pissed off some people here who Im not fit to carry their dirty socks. But I don't take any of it back.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 8:15 Comments ||
Top||
#8
The lefty media loved them some stories about vets who said "I don't want your thanks." The mindthoughts guy served. I had a friend whose dad liberated a death camp in WW II. He didn't want to talk about it...
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
09/04/2019 8:19 Comments ||
Top||
#9
Real heroes usually don't want to talk about it or defer to the 'other guys' who were there, then there are the John Kerrys who want you know about their exploits they wrote themselves up for but don't want you to see their personnel files.
#13
Back in the rear with the gear? You can still get dead, but it all counts toward 20. Individual assignments are generally not made by the enlisted man, officer or even contractor. Things may have changed, but the last time I checked, which was a quite a while back, you generally go where you are told.
#14
Once you enlist, or are commissioned it's not like you can quit if you don't like the job. Once you take off those CUs you never want to see them again. Don't know about others. Most of the time you're following the 'beat' and it carries you along wherever it goes. It's not like you can throw down your rifle in a war-zone and say 'Fuck this ! I'm out.'
'Almost all heroes are heroes of circumstance.' - wise old soldier
Only poseurs and padded shoulders will hire PR to post their pictures in uniform and talk about 'serving their country'. Plenty of room in any military for careerist opportunists.
#20
He is an ass, and this discussion shows it. You go to a combat zone, draw combat pay, by definition you are a combat vet. You are considered the same as any vet, firefight or not. He went outside the wire, Hat Tip to him. He was not a FOB rat. Again, I don't care for him or his politics, but he is a combat vet.
Posted by: 49 Pan ||
09/04/2019 12:33 Comments ||
Top||
#21
Did he lie about his sexual orientation in order to join?
[BBC] In Ypsilanti, in the US state of Michigan, Lisa Rochow sits beside her partner, Cameron Wheeler, as their Siberian Husky puppy crawls over their laps. Even though Aery, who keeps trying to wander off the couch, is a new addition to the family, both Rochow and Wheeler look relaxed for first-time ’parents’.
Aery is their baby: they won’t be having children. Rochow, 24, a graduate student in social work; Wheeler, 26, a high-school history teacher preparing for graduate school; and Aery, the nine-week-old puppy, make up a complete family unit.
"I feel like I would be giving up a lot of my life to be a parent," says Rochow. "That would cost money, that would cost time, that would cost things that you want to do." Wheeler adds that he’d constantly worry about a child ‐ "more so than most parents".
But "being child-free, a puppy has always been on the radar," says Rochow, who knew she didn’t want kids as early as high school. When she met Wheeler on Tinder at a music festival, he felt the same way about being child-free.
#1
Can't we find a way to export such self-regarding nitwits for hardworking, properly-educated, serious and culturally conservative couples from abroad for whom the essence of a well-lived life is raising children well?
Good old BBC, encouraging white people not to bear children and continue their line. Meanwhile illegal aliens and Muslims are having 7 babies per woman.
Posted by: Herb McCoy ||
09/04/2019 3:40 Comments ||
Top||
#4
The BBC even aired a program recently about the 'white, caucasian race' being genetically diluted and timed to fade out in another half century on their own, while the 'African sample' were genetically purer and would move on to evolve into supermen Wakandans fitter humans, adapted to global warming and UV rays. It was a hoot, if you could bear more than 10 minutes without throwing something at the screen.
Something out of a Richard von Coudenhove Kalergi wet dream.
#5
Mixed bloods are the future. Pure bloods have too many genetic problems. Among the blacks you're degree of black color can classify you adversely. Too black is inferior to the lighter blacks. Too white you are butchered for medical uses in Africa. This pet substitute is self elimination from the genetic pool.
#10
Probably a good thing. Can you imagine being the child of two such self absorbed, selfish, people? Will probably nrbef change you diaper because changing sh*tty diapers isnt trendy enough.
#11
Ypsilanti, right down the road from Ann Arbor, Michigan's answer to San Francisco.
Attention whores both of them.
"And their little dog(s) too" (apologies to TWWOTW)
#13
A tale of two Christs and a puppy
Who, none of 'em, knew their McGuffey:
Two lived to serve man
On the socialist plan...
And the pup? He grew up. Yep, a yuppie.
Posted by: Spemp Oppressor of the Visigoths3610 ||
09/04/2019 12:58 Comments ||
Top||
#14
If people don't want kids, they shouldn't have them. I think it is a bad thing that so many people seem to think that not having kids is a good thing, and I find it very disheartening that so many people are willing to indulge delusions that pets are children (they're not). But at the end of the day, if people aren't interested in having kids, they are probably better off not having them, and potential children are better off not being born instead of having disinterested and resentful parents who will ruin their lives.
[Hot Air] There’s a new book out about the Kavanaugh confirmation called "Search and Destroy: Inside the Campaign Against Brett Kavanaugh." The Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard has seen some excerpts from the book and highlights one of them today. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, spoke at a conference and suggested that Ford was motivated to come forward by her desire to put an asterisk next to Kavanaugh’s name should he later dismantle Roe v Wade:
In April this year, she spoke at the University of Baltimore’s 11th Feminist Legal Theory Conference titled "Applied Feminism and #MeToo." Lovelace secured a video of her address and provided a clip to Secrets...
Katz said:
"In the aftermath of these hearings, I believe that Christine’s testimony brought about more good than the harm misogynist Republicans caused by allowing Kavanaugh on the court. We were going to have a conservative [justice] ... elections have consequences, but he will always have an asterisk next to his name. When he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is, we know his character, and we know what motivates him, and that is important; it is important that we know, and that is part of what motivated Christine."
[The book’s author] explained, "Ford’s audience was not the Senate, as Katz had previously suggested, but the American people. If they could be persuaded that Justice Kavanaugh was a predator, then they might not accept a future ruling by the five Republican-appointed justices altering the right to obtain an abortion established by Roe v. Wade. Had the Senate understood Ford’s real motivation, as described by Katz, it might have appreciated more fully the pressure that ’organized forces’ were applying."
Of course, we don’t know exactly what Dr. Ford might have said that led her attorney to believe this was an accurate take on her views. Maybe this is Katz putting her own spin on things, after the fact. Maybe she’s trying to claim a moral victory in the face of an obvious defeat. That’s possible.
"If they could be persuaded that Justice Kavanaugh was a predator, then they might not accept a future ruling by the five Republican-appointed justices altering the right to obtain an abortion established by Roe v. Wade..."
...What do you mean, 'might not accept'? It's the Supreme Court, you fools, not the Dungeon Master for a Friday night game of D&D - you don't get to decide whether or not you 'accept' it, you DO and you go on.
Congratulations, folks, this is what we've come to after decades of legislating from the bench: if they think that a call might go the other way, they don't have to 'accept' it. (NOTE: does not apply to any decisions that we might not accept. Know your place, peasant.)
Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski ||
09/04/2019 4:30 Comments ||
Top||
#8
Her lies were so many and so transparent, they reeked to heaven.
She told absurd lies about her "trauma," including supposed fear of flying - even though she flew cross-country to D.C. for the circus hearings, and even though she routinely flies f---ing long-haul flights across the Pacific Ocean for her surfing vacations.
She lied about her / her hubby's separate Palo Alto home entrance for their renter - and concocted an absolutely ridiculous lie about how this separate address was actually an escape route to soothe her traumatized nerves.
Her high school reputation was as a slut with an early and frequent penchant for oral sex. Her lawyers and media flacks and Dem handlers bullied everyone around her to such an extent that these former classmates refused to publicly state what they privately acknowledged: if this liar had truly been traumatized as a schoolgirl, that event must have happened long before she ever met Kavanaugh because her sluttish behavior was consistent throughout her school days. College sorority sisters agreed she was a party girl with a drug habit.
According to her live-in boyfriend of nine years, she never mentioned anything remotely like a traumatic event. This ex- also testified under oath that he witnessed the nutjob coaching her FBI-applicant friend on how to pass a polygraph exam - in direct contradiction to her sworn statement that she never received or gave any training in how to game polygraphs.
This disgusting specimen needs to be publicly shamed and scorned.
Her filthy and outrageous lies must not be allowed to stand.
#11
This means her motive to come forward was political, at least in part. In other words she came forward to create a political impression on all who heard her based on her political beliefs.
This sounds so like the politically motivated hoaxes that have occurred often at colleges, which have been used to provoke hatred of republicans that proved to be created by leftists.
That prominent democrats supported her is shameful to themselves and their party.
Posted by: Daniel ||
09/04/2019 19:04 Comments ||
Top||
#12
She was put forward with the connivance of Chi-Com Spy-supporting Di-Fi
Posted by: Frank G ||
09/04/2019 19:47 Comments ||
Top||
#13
That prominent democrats supported her is shameful to themselves and their party.
The Left has no shame. However, they're more than happy to heap it on others. It's all about power.
[PJ] The era of mass media may have ended decades ago, but the hangover is about to hit us all hard. In "The coming death of just about every rock legend," Damon Linker of The Week explores the rock & roll carnage to come:
Yes, we've lost some already. On top of the icons who died horribly young decades ago ‐ Brian Jones, Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Elvis Presley, John Lennon ‐ there's the litany of legends felled by illness, drugs, and just plain old age in more recent years: George Harrison, Ray Charles, Michael Jackson, Lou Reed, David Bowie, Glenn Frey, Prince, Leonard Cohen, Tom Petty.
Those losses have been painful. But it's nothing compared with the tidal wave of obituaries to come. The grief and nostalgia will wash over us all. Yes, the Boomers left alive will take it hardest ‐ these were their heroes and generational compatriots. But rock remained the biggest game in town through the 1990s, which implicates GenXers like myself, no less than plenty of millennials.
All of which means there's going to be an awful lot of mourning going on.
Behold the killing fields that lie before us: Bob Dylan (78 years old); Paul McCartney (77); Paul Simon (77) and Art Garfunkel (77); Carole King (77); Brian Wilson (77); Mick Jagger (76) and Keith Richards (75); Joni Mitchell (75); Jimmy Page (75) and Robert Plant (71); Ray Davies (75); Roger Daltrey (75) and Pete Townshend (74); Roger Waters (75) and David Gilmour (73); Rod Stewart (74); Eric Clapton (74); Debbie Harry (74); Neil Young (73); Van Morrison (73); Bryan Ferry (73); Elton John (72); Don Henley (72); James Taylor (71); Jackson Browne (70); Billy Joel (70); and Bruce Springsteen (69, but turning 70 next month).
A few of these legends might manage to live into their 90s, despite all the ... wear and tear to which they've subjected their bodies over the decades. But most of them will not.
This will force us not only to endure their passing, but to confront our own mortality as well.
This is what happens when a genre is exhausted, and there aren’t any new stars of an equal stature arriving to take the place of the departed. As I wrote at Instapundit back in 2016, shortly after David Bowie, Lemmy of Motorhead and Glen Frey all trundled off to the place Pink Floyd dubbed "The Great Gig in the Sky." Growing up in the 1970s with a father who had an enormous collection of Big Band records, I would semi-regularly see him a bit morose in the morning, after the Today Show announced that another swing era superstar had died. Louis Armstrong in 1971. Gene Krupa in 1973. Duke Ellington in 1974. Ozzie Nelson in 1975. And Bing Crosby in 1977 (the big one, as my dad worshiped Crosby).
Almost none of that music is worth listening to. Most of it is embarrassing: hearing it again makes you wonder how stupid you must have been to think that these talentless shriekers were somehow poets.
Aside from Elvis and the early folk-era Beatles and a few songs here and there by the likes of Buddy Holly and several others, none of this stuff will be listened to 20 years from now the way people still listen to jazz greats.
#2
Similar to modern art as they call it. When flying over Paris Hugo looked out the window and said as I recall " We inherited a Paris of stone and our children inherited a Paris of plaster". Yes, Neal Young has been complaining of losses. I'm still hearing daily music from when I was in High School.Yes, that was many years ago.
#4
It was dying in the late '70s and early '80s then MTV (and second British invasion) happened which pulled the rug from under the suits driving the industry. The suits came back that by the late '80s it was back in decline.
#7
I wonder when online betting on rioters and civil defenders will catch on. Who knows, it may become the entertainment of the next ant-establishment generation.
'This Friday: Ohio NRA attacked by Memphis Mamas !'
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
09/04/2019 10:30 Comments ||
Top||
#9
Has the Internet so fractured the market that there is no Mass-Market™ any more? There used to be the "Top 40" that you had to listen to because that was all there was. Now there is a seemingly limitless supply AND people have gotten to the point they have the less attention span than a kitty cat -- if you get bored just watch/listen/do something else immediately.
So no more Radio Stars™ because there is no entertainment industry monopoly?
#10
Croaked ol' rock-n-roll, "Gimme shelter...
I've come a long ways from the Delta!
Though you ain't heard the blues
Since my first blue suede shoes --
Nor the bop -- I'm a helluva belter...
Urrrrrrrrrrrrrp!"
[LI] For years now, there have been warnings that the higher education bubble was going to burst. While we have witnessed the closure of many small schools this year already, one researcher at Harvard who studies higher education says the worst is yet to come.
Michael Horn, who studies and writes about colleges, suggests the rising cost of tuition and the economic downturn of 2008, among other factors, have created a perfect storm.
From CBS This Morning:
Expert predicts 25% of colleges will "fail" in the next 20 years
For the first time in 185 years, there will be no fall semester at Green Mountain College in western Vermont. The college, which closed this year, isn’t alone: Southern Vermont College, the College of St. Joseph, and Atlantic Union College, among others, have shuttered their doors, too.
The schools fell victim to trends in higher education ‐ trends that lead one expert to believe that more schools will soon follow.
"I think 25% of schools will fail in the next two decades," said Michael Horn, who studies education at Harvard University. "They’re going to close, they’re going to merge, some will declare some form of bankruptcy to reinvent themselves. It’s going to be brutal across American higher education."
Part of the problem, Horn explained, is that families had fewer kids after the 2008 recession, meaning that there will be fewer high school graduates and fewer college students. "Fundamentally, these schools’ business models are just breaking at the seams," he said.
The video report begins with the story of the recent closure of Green Mountain College in Vermont. When Robert Allen took over as president of the school in 2016, he knew almost immediately that it was too late to save it:
#1
We need far fewer colleges, a far lower % of 18 year-olds going on to four-year colleges, and far MORE vocational training & trade apprenticeship programs.
Only about 20% of the population needs a college degree - and that's roughly the % of the population that can handle higher-order abstract reasoning of the sort needed to do advanced math, science and other forms of complex analysis.
Every other American should be taught a skilled trade - and our corporations should be given every possible incentive to hire these trained and skilled Americans.
#2
They will do as Hospitals and news medias do and merge. Not finding a suitor, closure certainly. I suspect online activity will dramatically increase(last gasp). As the population ages and influx of immigrants poor and lacking skills, standards will be reduced. 70% of students at our local college are on assistance programs now. Minorities of the normally privileged group.
#4
End the faculty and administers enrichmentstudent loan program. If you want college money earn it or commit yourself to service programs like those for Public Health and the GI Bill.
#9
Lex's proposal is solid, but it is contingent upon the return of American industry, a growing economy, and a willingness to hire American tradesmen, not less costly Amigos.
#10
The above proposal of course assumes also an end to open borders and an overhaul of immigration policy to favor those with advanced skills. No more of this insane policy of swamping our low end labor market with an imported underclass.
#13
The number of six figure administrators who do either absolutely nothing or who perform completely unnecessary and outright silly tasks is terrifying. Even more terrifying is the fact that the college eagerly lets go of faculty and lower level staff (secretaries, etc) and downsizes every department and area of the college so that they can keep all of these goons (and whenever possible hire more).
[Politico] A judge has blocked the White House’s decision to revoke the press pass of Playboy correspondent Brian Karem over a Rose Garden showdown in July with former White House aide Sebastian Gorka.
U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras issued a decision Tuesday evening granting a preliminary injunction restoring Karem’s so-called "hard pass" on the grounds that the reporter had no clear notice of the rules governing press behavior at events like the presidential appearance that preceded the heated exchange. Contreras is a Soetoro appointee and FISA court judge, in case you missed it in the comment string.
In imposing a 30-day suspension last month, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said Karem’s behavior had violated widely accepted standards of "professionalism" and "decorum." She also argued that the White House made those standards clear last November following an incident involving an effort by CNN White House reporter Jim Acosta to hang on to a microphone as a press aide sought to take it away.
#4
It's a naked violation of the separation of powers. Just as the judge has a bailiff to remove disruptive individuals from his court room, the president's residence is his office to decide who comes and goes.
Unfortunately we now are ruled by people who sit for life and are 'de facto' unaccountable to the people. You can not call that a republic or a democracy. If you ever get a chance to reestablish a republic make sure everyone has term limits and is subject to direct accountability.
#5
This excerpt from Judge Contreras' Wiki bio could possibly explain a few things:
Rudolph Contreras (born December 6, 1962) is a United States District judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. He also serves as a judge on the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
#6
Trump should tell the Judge to take his ruling, roll it tightly, light it, then shove it where the sun doesn't shine and permanently bar this reporter from the grounds.
#13
So, give Karem his press pass. But never, ever call on him or even acknowledge his presence. Totally ignore him.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia ||
09/04/2019 12:58 Comments ||
Top||
#14
Contraries was one of the signers of the original warrant to surveil Carter Page
He also recused himself from the process when his cozy relationship with Peter Strzok came to light
He was mentioned several times in the Strzok Page text messages
#15
Judges should have term limits, age limits (yes, age limits, there should be no public officials allowed to serve into their 80s or 90s, I simply don't care what the excuse might be), and a clearly established and easy to use impeachment system.
[American Journal] There is a distinct "God, Family, Country," American culture. Along with the foundation of God-given freedom, life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and small non-intrusive government. Our culture is what made America a great nation. As one people one culture, we stand strong and offer the best hope for our country and the world. If we are at odds as many, self-interested entities we fail. We lose what our ancestors sacrificed to provide for us. We smother out the torch of freedom kept ablaze by those who came before us and struggled mightily for freedom and civil rights. When freedom’s light goes out in America, the rest of the world will too be in dangerous darkness. God Blessed America. American Journal
If you want to bring down a structure, you must weaken what makes it strong ‐ the critical parts that keep it standing steady. It’s an enduring principle and applies to everything. Whether a building, a person, a society, or a nation. Weaken what makes and keeps it strong and eventually, and catastrophically, it falls.
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
09/04/2019 0:19 Comments ||
Top||
#2
This assault has been going on for some time now. The best revenge is to just soldier on and to strengthen one's faith and to love your family and country.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.