| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Great Cultural Revolution |
| Various US court systems have mixed responses to the re-imposition of eviction moratorium |
| 2021-08-07 |
| [WKBN] Court decisions affect Ohio renters as new CDC eviction moratorium faces legal doubts. President Joe Biden may have averted a flood of evictions and solved a growing political problem when his administration reinstated a temporary ban on evictions because of the COVID-19 crisis. But he left his lawyers with legal arguments that even he acknowledges might not stand up in court. The new eviction moratorium announced Tuesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention could run into opposition at the Supreme Court, where one justice in late June warned the administration not to act further without explicit congressional approval. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which encompasses Tennessee, Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio, ruled in late July in a separate lawsuit that CDC lacks the authority to issue pauses on eviction. And the CDC order itself says it does not apply “to the extent its application is prohibited by federal court order.” As a result, Barbara Peck, a spokeswoman for the Tennessee state court system, said Wednesday that lawyers for courts in her state had “advised that it is not applicable in Tennessee.” Two large Ohio court systems on Thursday issued conflicting decisions regarding the new moratorium. In Franklin County, home to state capital Columbus, County Administrative Judge Ted Barrows said the moratorium wouldn’t be enforced based on last month’s 6th Circuit decision. But in Cuyahoga County, home to Cleveland, the new moratorium will be enforced, according to a release from the office of Housing Court Judge Mona Scott, who noted the county has the second-highest coronavirus transmission level in Ohio. Landlords from Alabama whose bid to lift the earlier pause on evictions failed returned to federal court in Washington late Wednesday, asking for an order that would allow evictions to resume. The administration is counting on differences between the new order, scheduled to last until Oct. 3, and the eviction pause that lapsed over the weekend to bolster its legal case. At the very least, as Biden himself said, the new moratorium will buy some time to protect the estimated 3.6 million Americans who could face eviction from their homes. Some legal scholars who doubt the new eviction ban will stand up say its legal underpinnings are strikingly similar to the old one. “Meet the new moratorium, same as the old moratorium!” Ilya Somin, a George Mason University law professor who backed Biden over former President Donald Trump last year, wrote on Reason.com. Nicholas Bagley, a University of Michigan law professor, said he expects landlords “all over the country to turn immediately to the courts in an effort to secure a preliminary injunction,” an order that would effectively allow evictions to resume. The basic legal issue is whether the CDC has the authority in the midst of a public health crises to impose a pause on evictions, under existing federal law that dates to 1944. U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled in May the CDC exceeded its power under that law, a decision Bagley called “measured and sensible.” But Friedrich kept her ruling in favor of the Alabama landlords on hold pending appeal. In June, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to allow the moratorium to remain in place through the end of July, even though one justice in the majority, Brett Kavanaugh, wrote that he believed CDC lacked authority to order it. Extending the moratorium any further, Kavanaugh wrote, would be possible only with “clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation).” In the landlords’ new court filing, lawyer Brett Shumate wrote that “the CDC caved to the political pressure by extending the moratorium, without providing any legal basis.” The administration has until early Friday to respond. Congress has not acted. Neither the House nor Senate had the votes for a temporary extension, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not so much as hint Tuesday that she would try to move legislation through the House. Related: Eviction moratorium: 2021-08-02 Ocasio-Cortez: Democrats can't blame Republicans for end of eviction moratorium Eviction moratorium: 2021-08-01 Cori Bush vows to sleep outside Capitol as eviction freeze nears end Eviction moratorium: 2021-06-12 Mayor Frey will use $28 million in pandemic relief money for housing in Minneapolis |
| Posted by:Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 |
| #4 ^ Exactly. There are an infinite number of articles complaining about the high cost of housing or the "lack of affordable housing". The government's response has been to tell renters and developers that it can at will terminate a renter's contractual right to collect rent, or to evict a tenant who is trashing the property. |
| Posted by: Matt 2021-08-07 11:47 |
| #3 No moratorium on mortgage payments for landlords. What are they supposed to do? |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2021-08-07 11:41 |
| #2 Our esteemed (spit) legislators have been and continue to be utterly clueless about handling the abrupt impoverishment of so many renters and the knock on effect of failure to pay rent with respect to landlords and the entire financial and real estate taxing system. Instead they push an idiotic $1.2 trillion "infrastructure" bill. |
| Posted by: Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 2021-08-07 07:16 |
| #1 barratry [ˈberətrē] NOUN definition 2 of 3: vexatious litigation or incitement to it. |
| Posted by: magpie 2021-08-07 01:28 |