You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Nasrallah warns U.S. to stop interfering in Lebanon
2005-03-09
Hundreds of thousands filled the streets of Beirut to hear the leader of the Lebanese resistance group Hizbullah warn the United States to stop interfering in Lebanon and denounce a UN resolution demanding the withdrawal of Syria's army and the disarming of militant groups. In what was widely labelled a "pro-Syrian" demonstration, Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah thanked Syria for its sacrifices in Lebanon, and firmly rejected UN Resolution 1559, which he said was Israeli-inspired. But he pointedly failed to say that Syrian troops should remain on Lebanese soil in a move that many observers interpreted as a concession to Lebanese opposition demands for their withdrawal.

Instead Nasrallah said Hizbullah supported the Taif Accord, which provides a framework for Syrian withdrawal. He said: "The troop withdrawal must happen according to the mechanism of the Taif Accord. The governments of the two countries alone have the right to set the suitable timetable for the troops' withdrawal." He added: "The Taif Accord is our only salvage to ensure the unity of the country and people. We must not only support the part of Taif that deal with the Syrian troops final withdrawal." He added that Syria's physical departure from Lebanon would not remove it from the "hearts and souls" of the Lebanese people. He said: "It was God's wish that Syria and Lebanon are natural neighboring countries. We must understand the implications of the geopolitics that what happens in one country would influence the other." The crowds swarmed into Beirut's Riad Solh Square coming from all parts of Lebanon waving Lebanese flags and and chanting anti American and pro-Syrian slogans.
Posted by:Fred

#8  Oooooooooooooooohhhhh. Too bad. I am unable to paste in the phot *I* titled, "Two JDAM's, one target." Shows the explosion and a second JDAM about 40 feet above the explosion! And I don't remember where I found it.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-03-09 11:37:00 PM  

#7  I'm fairly certain that something coming down at 12,000 fps which is Mach 10+ will make some kind of sound and leave a lovely trail of smoke as it scorches in. And so will the impact when it hits whatever it's aimed at. Plus, imagine the morale effect of seeing 50 or 100 of these ripping down into say, Iran's nuclear facilities. Maybe if they're buried deep enough, they could build a MOAB version of a THOR projectile, the kind that leaves geologically significant impact craters.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2005-03-09 11:24:42 PM  

#6  Silent, that brings new meaning to the term 'Death from Above' :) Would be even better if it SCREAMED like a BANSHEE as it was coming down.

here is a better Link which works :)
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-03-09 11:06:13 PM  

#5  Project Thor would provide a more than visible enough stick to use. Especially now with GPS guidence.

http://www.jerrypournelle.com/slowchange/mega.html#THOR
Posted by: Silentbrick   2005-03-09 10:51:17 PM  

#4  A JDAM or even a hellfire from an Apache could do the job as well.

Yeah, but that's low-key. The effect of visibly bringing in the big club, brandishing it, then whacking the intended victim over the head with it is priceless. :)
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-03-09 12:38:17 PM  

#3  UN Resolution 1559 was adopted by nine votes in favor (Angola, Benin, Chile, France, Germany, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, United States) to no votes against, with six abstentions (Algeria, Brazil, China, Pakistan, Philippines, Russia). So he rejects it as Israeli-inspired. Heck, even Muslim Pakistan, Muslim Algeria, and Syria-lovin', Iran-lovin' Russia didn't object.
Posted by: Tom   2005-03-09 11:02:30 AM  

#2  BAR-The equivalent of a 16 inch shell can be delivered much more cheaply than with an Iowa-class battleship. A JDAM or even a hellfire from an Apache could do the job as well. Just as long as Nasrallah ends up a grease stain on the rubble.
Posted by: Spot   2005-03-09 8:32:33 AM  

#1  Too bad none of the Iowa-class battleships weren't still active. A 16 inch shell landing on Nasrallah's residence while he was inside would solve quite a few problems.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-03-09 12:25:31 AM  

00:00