Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 11/28/2021 View Sat 11/27/2021 View Fri 11/26/2021 View Thu 11/25/2021 View Wed 11/24/2021 View Tue 11/23/2021 View Mon 11/22/2021
2021-07-17 -Great Cultural Revolution
US judge blocks new applications to DACA program for 'dreamer' immigrants
[JPost] Dems had a chance for a grand bargain along with fixing/filling the remainder of the wall. They chose politics
A US federal judge in Texas on Friday ruled a program that protects immigrants who were brought to the United States as children, often known as "Dreamers," from deportation violated US law when it was created, but said the hundreds of thousands of people already with the status would not be affected until further court rulings.

US District Judge Andrew Hanen sided with a group of states suing to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, arguing it was illegally created by former President Barack Obama in 2012. Hanen blocked the government from approving any new DACA applications. There are nearly 650,000 people currently enrolled in the program.
Which means that when the time comes to send them home so they can apply to come legally, we’ll know who they are and where they live.
Posted by Frank G 2021-07-17 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [160 views ]  Top

#1 Ha Ha Ha Ha!
Posted by Blackbeard Barnsmell6454 2021-07-17 01:36||   2021-07-17 01:36|| Front Page Top

Posted by Lionel Fillmore9492 2021-07-17 01:48||   2021-07-17 01:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Breaking — In Friday night ruling, Federal Judge declares DACA program is illegal and un-Constitutional !!!
Posted by Don Vito Crusock5478 2021-07-17 06:43||   2021-07-17 06:43|| Front Page Top

#4 Stealing an election is unconstitutional but has been ratified by SCOTUS. It's all about power, baby.
Posted by Procopius2k 2021-07-17 07:17||   2021-07-17 07:17|| Front Page Top

#5 Federal judge orders Biden to BLOCK new DACA applications after ruling Obama illegally created program shielding 650,000 migrant children from deportation
Posted by Skidmark 2021-07-17 07:47||   2021-07-17 07:47|| Front Page Top

#6 Migrant arrests at the southern border rise for the SIXTH month in a row under Biden: Guards caught 188,000 crossing in June - and 2.3 MILLION are projected to arrive by the end of 2021
Posted by Skidmark 2021-07-17 08:01||   2021-07-17 08:01|| Front Page Top

#7 From The Volokh Conspiracy, some thoughts:

The Path Forward For The Texas DACA Case
A stay from the Fifth Circuit is unlikely. Do Justices Kavanaugh and/or Barrett have the "fortitude" to let the injunction go into effect?

Today, Judge Hanen ruled that DACA was both procedurally and substantively invalid. (Co-blogger Jon Adler wrote about it here). This case has been pending forever. Texas filed the original complaint in May 2018. The case sat around while the DACA rescission litigation wound through the federal courts. Last June, the Chief set aside the rescission memorandum in Regents. Now, a year later, the district court set aside the original policy, which has been in effect since 2012. Yes, the policy is more than 9 years old. It has stretched the entirety of my academic career.

At this point, the Defendant-Intervenors, as well as the Biden Administration, will seek a stay from the Fifth Circuit. That remedy is very unlikely, as Hanen's decision follows very closely from the Fifth Circuit's DAPA decision. Later, the parties will seek an emergency stay from the Supreme Court.

How do the votes shake out? I suspect the Chief Justice will grant a stay for all three remedies. There is only one jurist in the country who can radically alter federal law, and his name is John G. Roberts. And we know the Chief does not like district court injunctions. Alas, Roberts plus the Kagan three makes four–not enough for a stay. And if all four dissent from the denial of a stay, it will be obvious to the world that Justices Kavanaugh and/or Barrett refused to help the Dreamers.

Will Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett have, in the words of Justice Gorsuch, the "fortitude" to deny the stay? Justice Kavanaugh recently split the difference in the eviction case: he found the moratorium illegal but declined to put that ruling into effect. My prediction? He declines to stay the first ground of relief, vote to stay at the second ground for relief, and urges the Court to grant cert before judgment for the third ground for relief. Plus he writes a hand-wringing concurrence about how DACA is illegal but the Dreamers are such wonderful people. He can copy-and-paste from his Regents decision: "They live, go to school, and work here with uncertainty about their futures."
Posted by trailing wife 2021-07-17 08:27||   2021-07-17 08:27|| Front Page Top

#8 they can go back to their country of origin and dream there.

unless they are actually being deported though, it is just more kicking the can down the road.
Posted by Retard Strength 2021-07-17 09:59||   2021-07-17 09:59|| Front Page Top

#9 I'm waiting for SCOTUS to throw out the constitution. Yeah it was unconstitutional but we write magic papers and its all good in the end. So, tell me why any of us have to follow any law other than what the 'enforcer' uses more power to impose.
Posted by Procopius2k 2021-07-17 13:38||   2021-07-17 13:38|| Front Page Top

09:34 Merrick Ferret
09:31 Merrick Ferret
09:19 Merrick Ferret
09:05 Lord Garth
09:05 AlmostAnonymous5839
09:03 Skidmark
09:01 Skidmark
09:01 NN2N1
08:58 Skidmark
08:53 NN2N1
08:51 NN2N1
08:50 Bertie Crains2651
08:48 NN2N1
08:46 Lord Garth
08:45 Besoeker
08:44 NN2N1
08:43 Bertie Crains2651
08:37 trailing wife
08:34 NN2N1
08:31 Raj
08:27 NN2N1
08:26 Besoeker
08:24 Too Old To Work
08:20 Merrick Ferret

Search WWW Search rantburg.com