Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2005-03-29 Home Front: WoT
Neocon Magazine Accused of Promoting 'Anti-Muslim Hate'
(CNSNews.com) - A Muslim terrorist civil rights group is urging the Boeing Company to stop running ads in the conservative National Review magazine. The Council on American-Islamic Relations objects to the National Review's promotion of books that "attack Islam and the Prophet Muhammad." Those books include "The Life and Religion of Mohammed," which, according to the magazine's review, exposes the "ugly truth about the founder of the world's most violent religion"; and "The Sword of the Prophet," which "gives the unvarnished, 'politically incorrect' truth about Islam -- including the shocking facts about its founder, Mohammed; its rise through bloody conquest; its sanctioning of theft, deceit, lust and murder."
In a letter to Boeing CEO James A. Bell, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad "respectfully" requested that Boeing "address the concerns of Muslims worldwide by withdrawing its advertising support from a magazine that actively promotes anti-Muslim hate."Awad said a copy of the letter would be sent to ambassadors of Muslim and Arab nations in Washington, D.C. Boeing does business with Arab-owned airlines.
Hey, Nihad! How about we stencil our reply on the nose of a few Boeing products and deliver them to you, airmail?
Posted by Steve 2005-03-29 12:31:04 PM|| || Front Page|| [11131 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Still not quite getting a grasp on that whole "freedom of the press" and "difference of opinion" thingy, are we, Nihad?
Posted by Sgt. Mom  2005-03-29 1:16:51 PM|| [http://www.sgtstryker.com]  2005-03-29 1:16:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Well, as soon as they get an apology from Muslims for using their products to plow into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, I'd be all for pulling the ads.....
Posted by Desert Blondie 2005-03-29 1:22:06 PM|| [http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]  2005-03-29 1:22:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Awad "respectfully" requested that Boeing "address the concerns of Muslims worldwide.."

Their products are doing it everyday in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hope these folks are paying attention.
Posted by tu3031 2005-03-29 1:23:53 PM||   2005-03-29 1:23:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Nice parellel, DB!

"You do something for me, I do something for you" is something they should understand very well. No reason not to do it, but somehow I think we'll just hear "...if Americans didn't do x y and z in the past, then there wouldn't be any terrorism..." or some other such evasion of responsibility for being the RoW. Religion of War=RoW. Wow, I never noticed before-it's an abbreviation for the British term 'row"-fight. :)

Posted by Jules 187 2005-03-29 2:08:03 PM||   2005-03-29 2:08:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 What are they going to do, boycott them? Only use Airbus planes in jihad operations? Hey, CAIR! Is it still okay for them to continue to build bombers?
Posted by BH 2005-03-29 2:15:20 PM||   2005-03-29 2:15:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, unaware that he is no longer relevant spouted unintelligible diatribes while spittle dripped out of the side of his mouth. I think that CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad needs to turn his sensitivity meter down a bit and take a deep breath. They had hoped that Americans would backlash towards Arabs over 9/11 but sadly they were left with nothing to complain about except that maybe someone might accuse ALL Muslims of homicidal maniacs. I bet CAIR is still denying that Arabs and Muslims had nothing to do with 9/11 or international terrorism. F%[K them and the camel they rode in on!
Posted by Cyber Sarge  2005-03-29 2:33:23 PM||   2005-03-29 2:33:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Um, last time I checked, National Review isn't a neocon outfit. It's pretty much a straight-ticket middle-of-the-road conservative publication. I think they're thinking of the Weekly Standard. Not that the Weekly Standard is particularly harsh on Islam - that's one of the characteristics of neocons vs. regular conservatives - a certain squishiness on the whole "nuke Mecca flat" thing.
Posted by Mitch H.  2005-03-29 2:38:24 PM|| [http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2005-03-29 2:38:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 I think NRO gives off a false positive on account of Jonah.
Posted by BH 2005-03-29 3:08:06 PM||   2005-03-29 3:08:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Jonah, Ledeen, a couple of others. NRO has neocons and paleocons, and their neocons tend to the rightwing end of "neocondom". WS is more purely neocon, and leans to the less rightwing end of neocondom, IMHO.
Posted by Liberalhawk 2005-03-29 3:49:12 PM||   2005-03-29 3:49:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 neocon = Jooooo = Kristol = Weekly Std;
c'mon, get your LLL logic straight

:-)
Posted by Frank G  2005-03-29 4:13:00 PM||   2005-03-29 4:13:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Neocondom?

Heh.
Posted by Parabellum 2005-03-29 6:15:30 PM||   2005-03-29 6:15:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Reminds me, I need to renew my subscription to National Review.
Posted by Dennis Kucinich  2005-03-29 7:18:47 PM||   2005-03-29 7:18:47 PM|| Front Page Top

09:43 Mullah Richard
09:27 Warthog
09:11 Mercutio
09:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
08:52 Matt
08:24 Matt
08:20 SteveS
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1
07:22 NN2N1
07:18 trailing wife
07:14 Richard Aubrey
07:10 NN2N1
07:09 Besoeker
07:03 NN2N1
06:58 NN2N1
06:58 Besoeker









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com