Article

2020-11-10 Economy

[Yahoo Finance] It’s tough enough for fixed-income investors — retirees, life-insurance companies, pension funds — to find high-yielding assets, with the Federal Reserve holding rates so low. It’ll get even tougher when negative yields comes to the U.S., according to one prominent investor.

Scott Minerd, chief investment officer at Guggenheim Investments, predicts that the yield on 10-year Treasury notes — currently around 0.82% — could flip to negative 0.5% by 2022. That could trigger a ripple effect that would eventually cause the Fed to assume risk, Minerd told Yahoo Finance Live.

Fed officials embarked on a listening tour over the past couple of years to gather not just data, but anecdotal evidence from their constituents. "The clients who I have who are insurance companies, who are pension funds, made the case to them that their policies were basically destroying their business," Minerd said. But he said the Fed didn’t see it as an urgent issue, focused on its dual mandate of price stability and full employment.

Indeed, the Fed is pumping liquidity into a financial system stressed by the coronavirus pandemic, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell said this week that the central bank is poised to help further if necessary.

"Is monetary policy out of power or out of ammo? The answer to that would be ’no,’" Powell told reporters following the Federal Open Market Committee’s decision to hold rates at near-zero.

Central banks around the globe are equally, if not more accommodative — which means there’s already plenty of negative-yielding debt. In fact, the amount of debt with negative yields reached a record high this week, with the the market value of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Negative Yielding Debt Index rising to $17.05 trillion.

Low- or negative-yielding debt has tended to push investors into higher-yielding — but riskier — assets. That’s one reason that many strategists cite when explaining the resilience of stocks.

When yields go negative in the U.S., it is "going to raise questions about the stability of the financial system, but the Federal Reserve and policymakers have basically been willing to socialize a lot of risks with the corporate bond purchase program," Minerd said. "So as time goes on, it will just force the policymakers into socializing more of these problems and making it the burden of the U.S. government."

That could dredge up a debate that reared its head during the Great Financial Crisis, the idea being that financial firms will take more risk if they think the government will bail them out.

Posted by Ebbomoger Speaking for Boskone4589 2020-11-10 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11144 views ] Top

#1 Audit the Fed

Posted by Theager Borgia1057 2020-11-10 02:12|| 2020-11-10 02:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Central Credit pricing is the biggest economic error in world history. It will do to the entire world what central pricing did to the USSR.
and I wonder if that's actually the plan....

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-11-10 02:21|| 2020-11-10 02:21|| Front Page Top

#3 The benefits accrue to the rich and powerful who have access to negative interest credit. Just another wealth transfer to the already rich.

Posted by Thusoting Big Foot1716 2020-11-10 02:26|| 2020-11-10 02:26|| Front Page Top

#4 Only a demented "investor" would loan money at a negative interest rate. It is bad enough to simply HOLD cash when the government is doing all in its power to decrease the value of cash.
BTW, just try borrowing a sum for a negative interest rate. You and I ain't in that club.

Posted by Grampaw Phavish2227 2020-11-10 10:50|| 2020-11-10 10:50|| Front Page Top

14:32 NoMoreBS
14:21 Grom the Affective
14:19 Grom the Affective
14:17 Clem+Elmish4239
14:14 Matt
14:11 Lord Garth
13:52 mossomo
13:48 swksvolFF
13:41 Secret Master
13:17 magpie
13:10 NoMoreBS
13:09 Gleng Whaick2262
13:08 Gleng Whaick2262
12:59 alanc
12:51 Besoeker
12:43 trailing wife
12:42 Jack Salami
12:42 swksvolFF
12:31 swksvolFF
12:15 Abu Uluque
12:14 Skidmark
12:13 Abu Uluque
12:13 Skidmark
12:03 Abu Uluque