Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 05/31/2025 View Fri 05/30/2025 View Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025
2004-12-09 Home Front: Politix
Lawmaker: Spy Project Threatens Security
Congress' new blueprint for U.S. intelligence spending includes a mysterious and expensive spy program that drew extraordinary criticism from leading Democrats, with one saying the highly classified project is a threat to national security. In an unusual rebuke, Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the senior Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, complained Wednesday that the spy project was "totally unjustified and very, very wasteful and dangerous to the national security." He called the program "stunningly expensive." Rockefeller and three other Democratic senators _ Richard Durbin of Illinois, Carl Levin of Michigan and Ron Wyden of Oregon _ refused to sign the congressional compromise negotiated by others in the House and Senate that provides for future U.S. intelligence activities. The compromise noted that the four senators believed the mystery program was unnecessary and its cost unjustified and that "they believe that the funds for this item should be expended on other intelligence programs that will make a surer and greater contribution to national security."
"We can't tell you anything about it, but it's evil. Trust us!"
Each senator _ and more than two dozen current and former U.S. officials contacted by The Associated Press _ declined to further describe or identify the disputed program, citing its classified nature. Thirteen other senators on the Intelligence Committee and all their counterparts in the House approved the compromise. Despite objections from some in the Senate, Congress has approved the program for the last two years, Rockefeller said.
So it's a old program?
The Senate voted Wednesday night to send the legislation to President Bush. The bill is separate from the intelligence overhaul legislation that also won final congressional approval Wednesday.
Ah, so this is different bill than the one the 9-11 Commission jammed down our throats
The rare criticisms of a highly secretive project in such a public forum intrigued outside intelligence experts, who said the program was almost certainly a spy satellite system, perhaps with technology to destroy potential attackers.
It's the space-based Zionist Death Ray! I was hoping that would be funded this year.
They cited tantalizing hints in Rockefeller's remarks, such as the program's enormous expense and its alleged danger to national security.
First the Dhimmicrats make it a national scandle that the 9/11 commision recommendations aren't passed. Then they whine when it is passed because it includes things they lost on in a majority vote. They sound like all whiners all the time. They need to start doing something positive or they will get as much attention as a 5 year old whiner.
snip
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-12-09 11:30:21 AM|| || Front Page|| [11131 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Not being privy to the details, I have to rely upon the signs and tell-tales...

If Rockefeller *spit* and Levin *gag* are against it - charter members of The Utterly Partisan Self-Serving TV-Interview-Hound Assholes Union, well - that prolly means it's a good thing. These buttwipes would give away the intel farm to our enemies for a favorable interview and some political points.
Posted by .com 2004-12-09 12:21:37 PM||   2004-12-09 12:21:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Rockefeller couldn't find national security with both hands. Capital P partaisan Dhimmi political trash talk.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2004-12-09 12:28:55 PM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-12-09 12:28:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Called positioning, I believe. They know they are cannot stop the bill so they make an issue of an obsure clause so that down the road a few years when there is a screw-up they can jump up and say "We told you so".
Posted by john  2004-12-09 3:50:49 PM||   2004-12-09 3:50:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 The only thing hazardous to national security is the self serving politicos in the democratic party. While I enjoy the self destruction taking place, it is not good in the long term to have a country that can only rely on one party for national security.
Posted by Douglas De Bono  2004-12-09 8:47:26 PM|| [http://www.DouglasDeBono.com]  2004-12-09 8:47:26 PM|| Front Page Top

19:51 trailing wife
18:31 Difar Dave
18:16 Besoeker
17:17 Gustav
17:04 Bobby
17:01 Bobby
16:57 Glolutch Tingle1702
15:37 Procopius2k
15:29 NoMoreBS
15:21 NoMoreBS
15:04 NN2N1
15:03 NN2N1
14:55 NN2N1
14:09 Grom the Affective
14:04 Super Hose
14:02 Super Hose
13:37 Procopius2k
13:35 Grom the Affective
13:34 Procopius2k
13:27 Grom the Affective
13:21 NN2N1
13:18 Grom the Affective
12:50 Remoteman
12:45 Secret Master









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com