Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/30/2025 View Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025
2016-12-31 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
UK distances itself from Kerry's speech on Israel settlement expansion
[MIDDLEEASTEYE.NET] The British government on Thursday distanced itself from harsh criticism of Israel by US Secretary of State John F. I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry
Former Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, self-defined war hero, speaker of French, owner of a lucky hat, conqueror of Cambodia, unsuccessful presidential candidate, and utterly failed Secretary of State...
, saying peace between Israel and the Paleostinians cannot be brokered solely on Israeli settlement construction.

British Prime Minister Theresa May's spokesperson said Britannia supports a two-state solution and considers the construction of settlements on Paleostinian lands illegal.

However the statement added that the issue of settlements was only part of the problem.

"But we are also clear that the settlements are far from the only problem in this conflict," the spokesperson said.

"In particular, the people of Israel deserve to live free from the threat of terrorism, with which they have had to cope for too long,"

Without referring to the secretary of state's comments, the British government's comments appeared to criticise Kerry's speech, even though the UK voted in favour of the Security Council resolution last week that deemed Israel settlements beyond the 1967 border illegal.

"We do not, therefore, believe that the way to negotiate peace is by focusing on only one issue, in this case the construction of settlements, when clearly the conflict between the Israelis and Paleostinians is so deeply complex," May's spokesperson said.

"And we do not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an ally. The government believes that negotiations will only succeed when they are conducted between the two parties, supported by the international community."

Posted by Fred 2016-12-31 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11133 views ]  Top

#1 "No need to be impolite to people we're trying to railroad to extermination"?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-12-31 03:27||   2016-12-31 03:27|| Front Page Top

#2 Simply more of the same.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-12-31 08:06||   2016-12-31 08:06|| Front Page Top

#3 Hmmm...UK is a permanent member of the Security Council and thus could have vetoed the resolution themselves. See- horse, barn door
Posted by P2Kontheroad 2016-12-31 16:32||   2016-12-31 16:32|| Front Page Top

#4 The UK voted for the UNSC resolution because, the avowed Israel-lover PM May explained, it is balanced. She objected to Secretary Kerry's subsequent speech (after Israeli PM declined to meet with her in response to that vote), because it was unbalanced.
Posted by trailing wife 2016-12-31 17:23||   2016-12-31 17:23|| Front Page Top

11:21 SteveS
11:12 Jack Fleling2104
10:52 Nero
10:44 Procopius2k
10:44 Grom the Affective
10:40 Procopius2k
10:39 Procopius2k
10:37 Besoeker
10:35 Besoeker
10:35 Elmerert Hupens2660
10:31 Frank G
10:29 Grom the Affective
10:27 Glenmore
10:26 Jack Fleling2104
10:23 Glenmore
10:13 Glenmore
10:11 Difar Dave
10:01 Old Patriot
10:00 NN2N1
09:58 EMS Artifact
09:55 EMS Artifact
09:48 Besoeker
09:43 magpie
09:35 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com