Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/30/2025 View Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025
2004-10-19 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Nukes Will Not Be Used
Following the Beslan tragedy last month, Russian officials began threatening to attack Chechen rebel sympathizers and representatives abroad. Last week, Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov, who was attending a meeting of the NATO-Russia Council in Poiana Brasov, Romania, said that Russia would launch pre-emptive strikes against terrorists worldwide, but would stop short of using nuclear weapons.

Hours later, the first "pre-emptive strike" occurred in London. The homes of exiled Chechen rebel envoy Akhmed Zakayev and former Federal Security Service officer Alexander Litvinenko were attacked with Molotov cocktails. Zakayev is the chief representative of Chechen rebel leader Aslan Maskhadov in the West. Litvinenko has in the past accused the FSB of carrying out the 1999 bombings of Moscow apartment buildings in order to create a pretext for invading Chechnya and of plotting to kill Boris Berezovsky. Zakayev, Litvinenko and Berezovsky have been granted political asylum in Britain.

The arson attacks damaged property, but no one was injured and no arrests have been made. Boris Labusov, the official spokesman for the Foreign Intelligence Service, or SVR, ruled out any SVR involvement. Technically, Labusov may be telling the truth, but the SVR is not the only branch of Russia's intelligence services operating abroad. In Qatar, two officers of the General Staff's Main Intelligence Directorate, or GRU, were convicted for a car bombing in February that killed former Chechen rebel leader Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev.

Continued from Page 2



The Kremlin never admitted it was behind the Qatar attack, but in Moscow the incident was hotly discussed within the intelligence community. A number of GRU officers, both active and retired, told me about the indignation within the service about the mishandled assassination and how the SVR botched its part of the job.

In the Soviet era, the SVR -- then part of the KGB -- handled covert political assassinations abroad. That know-how has now been lost. GRU special forces were trained to assassinate Western leaders in the event of a war with NATO in Europe. The only aim of such an operation would have been to eliminate the target. Misleading investigators after the fact would not be a priority. My sources in the GRU insist that their job -- the actual assassination -- was done well, but that the SVR failed to evacuate the agents as planned.

In Russia today, as in the Soviet Union, the activities of most government agencies are a state secret. No Freedom of Information Act allows the public to demand access to government files. But when everything is classified, it’s impossible to tell the important secrets from the trivial ones. And in Russia today, there is a risk that almost any secret could be leaked.

Immediately after the Beslan tragedy, the security services put together an 11-point plan for Chechnya. It was sent to President Vladimir Putin. Along the way, the draft was leaked and published, a common way to build support for proposals that the bureaucracy is likely to reject -- in this case, increasing anti-terrorist cooperation with Israel. Following its publication, the plan was adopted by the Kremlin.

Point six of the draft reads as follows: "The SVR’s stations in Western Europe should constantly monitor Berezovsky’s actions, because he is not only the brains behind the anti-Putin opposition, but also has close contacts with Chechen rebels and is behind all recent major terrorist attacks in Russia."

Point seven declares: "Despite the failed final phase of the operation to kill Yandarbiyev, the practice of eliminating Chechen separatist leaders and the emissaries of Maskhadov should continue."

Labusov ruled out the possibility of Russian involvement in the London arson attacks, suggesting that "relatives or friends" of victims in the Beslan hostage-taking might have carried them out. That’s an interesting twist. During the murder trial in Qatar, the Russian side was startled to learn that the assassins could have been acquitted according to Muslim legal tradition that allows acts of personal revenge, if it could have been proven that the agents or their relatives had suffered at the hands of Chechen rebels.

The oversight of sending assassins to Qatar who had no motive for revenge was much discussed in the Moscow intelligence community. From now on, it seems attacks on Putin’s political opponents will be connected with Beslan or other terrorist outrages. But nuclear weapons will not be used.
Posted by tipper 2004-10-19 3:01:46 AM|| || Front Page|| [11135 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 What a strange article. It's point is that Russia says it will retaliate against terrorists up to but not including nukes. Then it tries to sell the idea that the Russian's first "pre-emptive strike" was with Molotov cocktails!?? *snicker* Me thinks the idea of Beslan revenge seems a bit more *ahem* logical.

Zakayev, Litvinenko and Berezovsky have been granted political asylum in Britain. For heavens sakes, why????

very strange piece.
Posted by 2b 2004-10-19 3:23:14 AM||   2004-10-19 3:23:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Nice strategy:

"We will destroy you, but not with any of the 5,000 nukes we have on hand. We have spoons. Spoons are enough for you."
Posted by beer_me 2004-10-19 3:25:01 AM||   2004-10-19 3:25:01 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 If they even suspected the Breslan atrocity and did nothing to stop it I hope some does use a spoon to remove their eyes and then scoop their brains out. Death to all the %&*@ing Chechen terrorsits and anyone who supports or has supported them.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2004-10-19 5:46:08 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-10-19 5:46:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 The obvious question is how do you terrorize the Muslim terrorists? They know how to reach civilized peoples without spending great sums of money. How do we reach them? One way would be to track down their families and lay into them. Example: Zarkawi murders right and left and hacks off people's heads. His people slaughter 30 at a clip with car bombs. Yet his family lives an undisturbed life in Jordan.
Posted by dennisw 2004-10-19 6:06:13 AM||   2004-10-19 6:06:13 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 No reports of these Chechens having their homes firebombed in the UK press? Bulldog - hear owt? This is precisely why we have a system of political asylum - to prevent barbaric acts being perpetrated against individuals should they return to their own country. Being a force for good in the world makes me proud to be British.
Posted by Howard UK 2004-10-19 6:19:08 AM||   2004-10-19 6:19:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 aherm...
Posted by Howard UK 2004-10-19 6:19:30 AM||   2004-10-19 6:19:30 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Howard? You got something in your throat?

Well I am pretty sure the old KGB knew how to terrorise terrorists. If I recall it did entail using influnce over the lives/body parts of close relations. In Zarkawi's case he is a pathological murderer/sociopathic murder and would not likely be effected by such a series of actions.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2004-10-19 7:07:37 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-10-19 7:07:37 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Howard read the Grauniad with his tea this morning.
Posted by Mickey Silvester 2004-10-19 8:11:45 AM||   2004-10-19 8:11:45 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 #7 SPoD, how'bout body parts of Zarqawi himself. Do you think that may resolve this matter adequately?
Posted by Conanista 2004-10-19 8:34:02 AM||   2004-10-19 8:34:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 I'm glad Kery has not volunteered to take nukes off the table. Probably because he hasn't thought of it.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-10-19 9:55:23 AM||   2004-10-19 9:55:23 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Dennisw: “Example: Zarkawi murders right and left and hacks off people's heads. His people slaughter 30 at a clip with car bombs. Yet his family lives an undisturbed life in Jordan.”

Yes, I don’t understand it. The US may be too squeamish for a “mafia” approach at this stage of the WoT, but other world players aren’t. Even individuals could seek revenge against Zarkawi’s family.

Perhaps his family is closely monitored in the hope that they will lead to Zarkawi.


SPOD: “In Zarkawi's case he is a pathological murderer/sociopathic murder and would not likely be effected by such a series of actions.”

Perhaps Zarkawi wouldn’t be affected but I’d be willing to give it a try. It might deter other potential terrorists. Or it might make family members more willing to restrain or report their relatives.
Posted by Anonymous5032 2004-10-19 11:00:33 AM||   2004-10-19 11:00:33 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 A muslim rat out another muslim. Rat out a muslim family member. Not going to happen.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2004-10-19 11:48:11 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-10-19 11:48:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 Fair enough SPoD, then the Russians should ice his family and friends. Whether they go further than that (friends of friends, cousins etc) is up to them.
Posted by Tony (UK)  2004-10-19 3:38:46 PM||   2004-10-19 3:38:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 "I'm coming out. I see anybody and I'm gonna kill him. Any son-of-a-bitch takes a shot at me, I'm not only gonna kill him, I'm gonna kill his wife and all his friends and burn his damn house down. Nobody better shoot!"
Posted by John Simmins  2004-10-19 4:43:31 PM||   2004-10-19 4:43:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 Seeing this discussion reminds me of something I've wondered about since 9/11: If the Mafia (in all of its guises and forms) has the power that it pretends to have, why hasn't *it* taken action against Islamofascists where governments and civillians have lacked the willpower to do so?
Posted by Crusader 2004-10-19 7:16:06 PM||   2004-10-19 7:16:06 PM|| Front Page Top

00:48 Besoeker
00:40 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com