Article

2004-03-29 Israel-Palestine

Hamas-Hizbullah agree on elevating coordination

The Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, and the Lebanese Hizbullah party have agreed on the importance of coordination among all Arab and Muslim resistance factions. Hamas, in a statement a copy of which was made available to the PIC, said that a Hamas delegation led by Khaled Mishaal, the Movementâs political bureau chief, and a delegation of the Hizbullah party led by Hasan Nasrallah, the partyâsâ secretary general, discussed in a meeting repercussions of the Zionist assassination crime of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.

"Awright, youse guys! Which one of us is gonna be next?"

The statement noted that both parties strongly condemned the terrorist crime that targeted one of the Muslim Ummahâs symbols and great leaders. The heinous crime would not, however, weaken resistance but rather would inflame resistance against Zionist occupation and would initiate a qualitative leap in the role and performance of resistance in Palestine, the statement elaborated. It quoted both parties as appreciating the Arab and Muslim massesâ reaction that proved anew the vitality of those masses and their true affiliation. The statement in conclusion said that Mishaal thanked Nasrallah and his brothers for their genuine fraternal feelings and backing to the Movement and Palestine, affirming that such a spirit would accelerate the Ummahâs renaissance and efforts to regain its occupied lands and wasted dignity. The party delegation had affirmed absolute solidarity with the Hamas Movement and declared that all party potentials were under the disposal of Hamas.

Hmmm... A merger, is it?

Posted by Fred 2004-03-29 6:52:18 AM|| || Front Page|| [11127 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 This is standard super-villain (TM) ranting that doesn't mean anything. We have seen at the Arab Leauge summit that never was that Arab solidarity doesn't exist outside these kinds of ravings.

Also Israel has been proved right. Kill a terrorist leader and the level of terrorism goes down for a while.

Posted by Phil B 2004-03-29 7:43:03 PM|| 2004-03-29 7:43:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 The IDF needs to keep its crosshairs on Rantisi with one in the chamber. If Hamas-Hizb'allah gets too frisky, then take another one out and reload.

Continue the above loop until:
1 run out of resistance, or
2 run out of leaders, or both.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2004-03-29 8:00:43 PM|| 2004-03-29 8:00:43 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Is this algorithm re-entrant? There have been coding errors in previous routines (e.g. Hunting Elephants) -- the pros know you have to put a qualifying datum in the last location to be searched so you don't end up in an endless loop. Mebbe they should put Ramallah last, just in case...

Posted by .com 2004-03-29 8:07:42 PM|| 2004-03-29 8:07:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Bull. If we're to take the stance (which I believe is a correct and justified one) that the terrorist leaders of Hamas are killed because they're a constant military enemy with whom there can exist no meaningful negotiations since their positions are fundamentally opposed, then there's no reason whatsoever in "keeping the crosshairs on Rantissi". This isn't a negotiation. This is war.

Take Rantissi out the moment you have him on said crosshairs. Then take out the next one who'll step on his place. And the next one. And the next one. Waiting until they "get too frisky" means what exactly, allowing them time to regroup? Or has there been some declaration of peace on the part of Hamas that I've not been aware of? Hamas has already declared full out war, they are already as frisky as one can get.

And Israel should also treat this as full-out war between itself and Hamas, because if it doesn't, even the death of Yassin becomes mere foolishness rather than justified.

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2004-03-29 8:13:10 PM|| 2004-03-29 8:13:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Thank you, Aris. That's a point I've made many times in the past. There's always more cannon fodder to be had. The way to win a war is to take out the enemy high command, who, by the process of conducting warfare, become legitimate targets. If Hamas should succeed in bumping off Sharon, by the way, the same principle would appy, though I'd react differently.

Posted by Fred 2004-03-29 8:39:10 PM|| 2004-03-29 8:39:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Well dang... I'm with Aris again. That 3 times this year.

Don't let the leaders of Hamas, PFLP, IH, Fatah, have more than 3 days on the job training.

Posted by Shipman 2004-03-29 8:41:19 PM|| 2004-03-29 8:41:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Aris. Well said!

Posted by 11A5S 2004-03-29 9:02:55 PM|| 2004-03-29 9:02:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Don't let the leaders of Hamas, PFLP, IH, Fatah, have more than 3 days on the job training.

So much for their 401(k) plan...

Posted by Raj 2004-03-29 9:10:13 PM|| [http://angrycyclist.blogspot.com] 2004-03-29 9:10:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 he IDF needs to keep its crosshairs on Rantisi with one in the chamber.

Not just Rantisi, but Nasrallah as well. If these terrorist organizations are going to have a merger of sorts, then there's every reason to whack ALL the leaders, no matter which "division" they belong to.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-03-29 10:16:35 PM|| 2004-03-29 10:16:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Good point Aris :)

I would like to point out that by sponsoring and supporting the targetting and murder of innocent civilians (usually an act of war in most countries) Hamas and the PA and Hizbullah and all the rest are already in a state of war with Israel. Do you think they would, for one second, hesitate to murder Sharon (or any Jew for that matter)?

Posted by CrazyFool 2004-03-30 12:04:32 AM|| 2004-03-30 12:04:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 The Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, and the Lebanese Hizbullah party have agreed on the importance of coordination among all Arab and Muslim resistance factions.

Great news! Now let's get them all into the same tent. Makes it a lot easier for the guy hovering over the bombsight.

Posted by Zenster 2004-04-04 9:32:41 PM|| 2004-04-04 9:32:41 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Aris, (wiping tears) well said!

Posted by Frank G 2004-04-04 9:58:22 PM|| 2004-04-04 9:58:22 PM|| Front Page Top

13:54 mossomo
13:51 mossomo
13:50 NoMoreBS
13:50 Abu Uluque
13:44 Abu Uluque
13:41 NoMoreBS
13:39 Abu Uluque
13:36 mossomo
13:36 swksvolFF
13:32 mossomo
13:26 Frank G
13:12 Regular joe
13:12 mossomo
13:11 swksvolFF
13:08 Abu Uluque
13:00 swksvolFF
12:59 Regular joe
12:55 Skidmark
12:53 Skidmark
12:52 Abu Uluque
12:50 Abu Uluque
12:49 Skidmark
12:48 NN2N1
12:46 Skidmark