Article

2009-07-20 Iraq

U.S. Bases in Iraq "Prison-Like" for GIs

(AP) An Iraqi military commander on Monday compared new restrictions on the U.S. military to "house arrest," saying American combat troops cannot patrol as freely as they did before pulling out of cities on June 30.

Col. Ali Fadhil, a brigade commander in Baghdad, cited several occasions in which Iraqi troops turned down U.S. requests to move around the capital, and in one instance to conduct a raid - the Iraqis carried out that operation themselves. The new balance of authority stems from a security agreement that requires all U.S. troops to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011.

Fadhil spoke to The Associated Press about conditions in Baghdad, where violence has dropped dramatically since the sectarian bloodletting and insurgent attacks that swept much of the country in past years.

"They are now more passive than before," he said in reference to his U.S. allies. "I also feel that the Americans soldiers are frustrated because they used to have many patrols, but now they cannot. Now, the American soldiers are in prison-like bases as if they are under house-arrest."

The U.S. military in Iraq had no immediate comment Monday on the relationship with its Iraqi counterparts. It has said that it remains available to assist them and has noted progress in the Iraqi military despite lingering questions about its resolve and training.

On July 16, three U.S. soldiers were killed in an assault on a U.S. base near an airport in Basra in southern Iraq. Maj. Gen. Rick Nash, commanding general of Multi-National Division-South, said the U.S. was committed to fulfilling the terms of the security agreement. But he also said: "U.S. forces have an inherent right to self-defense and the authority to protect themselves."

Hadi al-Amiri, a lawmaker and member of the parliament's security and defense committee, said the Americans' withdrawal from the cities went very smoothly.

Outside of cities, Americans are free to move without approval, Iraqi officials said. Iraqi forces face near-daily attacks in urban areas, though most of the violence is not on the scale of the past.

On Monday, a car bomb killed two police officers and injured eight civilians in Ramadi, west of Baghdad, said Maj. Gen. Tareq Youssef, the police chief of Anbar province. Ramadi, the provincial capital, was once a stronghold of Sunni insurgents.

Four police and one civilian died in attacks in and near the northern city of Mosul, Iraqi police said.

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2009-07-20 12:00|| || Front Page|| [11145 views ] Top

#1 So why do the Ami's stay and put up with such abuse? To avoid the cost of coming back to right things after the overconfident Iraqis undo the progress, yes?

Posted by Lagom 2009-07-20 14:13|| 2009-07-20 14:13|| Front Page Top

#2 What abuse? The Iraqi commander isn't particularly high-ranking, and it's just his opinion. If US troops aren't needed, and just sit around in their bases, then that's a GOOD thing. If he's mouthing off about how GIs are in prison, then it's just feelings of superiority (caused by an inferiority complex).

Posted by gromky 2009-07-20 14:37|| 2009-07-20 14:37|| Front Page Top

#3 Actually, the way I read it, the Iraqi Colonel was making it known that he wouldn't mind if the Americans had more freedom of action. I thought his choice of words was to let his leadership know that he disapproves of the new policy.

Posted by Plastic Snoopy 2009-07-20 18:01|| 2009-07-20 18:01|| Front Page Top

#4 When life gives you lemons... In this case, since they are out of the cities, US forces should put a serious crimp in enemy movements in the countryside. There is always more than enough to do.

Posted by Anonymoose 2009-07-20 18:19|| 2009-07-20 18:19|| Front Page Top

04:34 NN2N1
04:27 Silentbrick
03:40 NN2N1
00:56 Rex Mundi
00:26 Oregon Dave