Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 12/27/2007 View Wed 12/26/2007 View Tue 12/25/2007 View Mon 12/24/2007 View Sun 12/23/2007 View Sat 12/22/2007 View Fri 12/21/2007
1
2007-12-27 India-Pakistan
Benazir Bhutto killed by suicide bomber
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Delphi 2007-12-27 08:30|| || Front Page|| [11 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Pakistan 

#1 Martial law, anyone?
Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek  2007-12-27 08:50||   2007-12-27 08:50|| Front Page Top

#2 that will confirm, for many, that Perv did it both to get rid of her, and as an excuse for martial law.
Posted by Liberalhawk 2007-12-27 08:53||   2007-12-27 08:53|| Front Page Top

#3 Her supporters at the hospital began chanting ``Dog, Musharraf, dog,'' referring to Pakistan's president Pervez Musharraf.

Even if he didn't have anything to do with it, he's gonna get the blame. Things are going to get interesting, real fast.
Posted by Steve 2007-12-27 08:59||   2007-12-27 08:59|| Front Page Top

#4 Agreed Steve, and not "interesting" in a good way, either.

'Hawk, you're right, whether Perv did it or not, he'll get blamed, and it will be to the advantage of many to push that meme.
Posted by Mike 2007-12-27 09:08||   2007-12-27 09:08|| Front Page Top

#5 The leftoids at the office are already blaming... the Americans! "They said they would protect her.", etc. With what f*cking magic wand?
Posted by Excalibur 2007-12-27 09:09||   2007-12-27 09:09|| Front Page Top

#6 In practical terms, who is going to do what?

Bhuttos people are initially blaming Perv, but that could quickly change if he offers them power like he did Bhutto. While it won't be all sweetness and light between them, they will not refuse power.

But then what?
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-12-27 09:22||   2007-12-27 09:22|| Front Page Top

#7 Chalk another one up to the Religion of Pieces
Posted by PlanetDan 2007-12-27 09:26||   2007-12-27 09:26|| Front Page Top

#8 At this point, Im not sure a PPP-Perv power sharing agreement would work. The agreement with Bhutto had already broken down. To prove he wasnt involved, hed have to give up more.
Posted by Liberalhawk 2007-12-27 09:27||   2007-12-27 09:27|| Front Page Top

#9 I wouldn't be surprised if it was the work of the talibunnies/al-quada and the ISI working together. And in reality, this is the last thing Musharraf needed. I think we might be looking at the first stages of a Islamic taker.

The other possiblity is a couple kooks got lucky. But it the fallout will be similar to scenario one.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2007-12-27 09:38||   2007-12-27 09:38|| Front Page Top

#10 A couple kooks "got lucky," perhaps, but that's because somebody has a strategy of throwing dozens of boomers out there on the assumption that some of them will succeed.

I don't think Perv did it, but he set up the situation that made it possible by being in bed with the Talibs.
Posted by Fred 2007-12-27 10:18||   2007-12-27 10:18|| Front Page Top

#11 Jules Crittenden:

More likely the jihadis got lucky. No peaceful transition to civilian leadership for Pakistan, with the murder of a major popular pro-American secularist. Questions:

Jihadis, ISI, or some combination?

Does this unite them against jihadis or just further fragment Pakistan to the jihadis benefit?

Does the election even go ahead, or is it straight to martial law? Short-term or long-term suspension, and in the event of an election, who rises?

If they buy the “dog Musharraf dog” line, or if it’s true, how bloody will the demonstrations be, and will they lead to a coup? If there’s a coup, who and what ends up on top?

No good answers to any of that yet. I have a very bad feeling about all of this. The potential for critically destablizing a flank that was difficult enough as it was, is huge. I’d feel slightly better if Rumsfeld had doubled the size of the Army, and wish Bush and Congress would crank that up. This war is far from over. This war is no artificial Bush creation or figment of anyone’s imagination, and should still be very much part of our own election, wishful thinking notwithstanding.
Posted by Mike 2007-12-27 10:22||   2007-12-27 10:22|| Front Page Top

#12 AQ: We Did It.
Posted by doc 2007-12-27 10:48||   2007-12-27 10:48|| Front Page Top

#13 Good find, doc. But, of course Al Qaeda claimed it. They haven't exactly had many big wins (or even small wins) for quite some time. It will be interesting to see who else claims the triumph.
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2007-12-27 11:02||   2007-12-27 11:02|| Front Page Top

#14 Benazir was not pro-amerrican and was no secularist. She would have gladly supported islamists if that would helped her. The only thing prevented this scnerio was Islamist unwlligness to be ruled by a wymin not her not wanting.
Posted by JFM">JFM  2007-12-27 11:35||   2007-12-27 11:35|| Front Page Top

#15 al-Qaeda will claim it but will blame it on the USA and George Bush, with a nod towards Israel.
Posted by RD">RD  2007-12-27 13:31||   2007-12-27 13:31|| Front Page Top

23:58 Seafarious
23:56 twobyfour
23:54 JosephMendiola
23:47 JosephMendiola
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:39 JosephMendiola
23:37 twobyfour
23:33 JosephMendiola
23:31 JosephMendiola
23:29 JosephMendiola
23:28 JosephMendiola
23:27 3dc
23:25 JosephMendiola
23:23 twobyfour
23:16 Barbara Skolaut
23:11 Frank G
23:07 trailing wife
23:02 trailing wife
22:59 trailing wife
22:55 twobyfour
22:54 Frank G
22:48 Frank G
22:45 twobyfour
22:37 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com