Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2007-02-26 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
US aircraft carrier has no plans to “intimidate Iran”
ON BOARD THE USS JOHN C. STENNIS, off the coast of Pakistan - To the deafening roar of war planes taking off from the nuclear-powered US aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis, US military commanders insist that intimidating Iran is not part of their mission in the region. The carrier and its battle group has been in the Gulf of Oman since February 19, anchored about 120 nautical miles off the coast of Pakistan, in what the US Navy says is a mission to provide support for ground forces operating in Afghanistan and Iraq.
I doubt they're actually 'anchored'.
The Stennis has joined the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the area, fuelling speculation that Washington could be preparing for a military strike against arch-foe Iran over its controversial nuclear programme.

But the carrier’s commanding officer Captain Bradley E. Johanson said the vessel was in the region to reassure Washington’s key oil-rich Arab allies in the Gulf Cooperation Council. “We have received very explicit guidance that we will not assume any sort of escalatory posture with Iran,” Johanson told AFP as an F/A-18F Super Hornet took off heading north in the direction of Pakistan and Afghanistan.
"Nope, our F-18s don't intimidate anyone. Why, I gave each plane a specific order not to do any intimidating out there," he added.
“No sort of escalatory posture at all with Iran,” Johanson reiterated. “Our mission is not to go and intimidate Iran. Our mission is to go and make the GCC partner-nations comfortable with the security situation.”

However, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates said in January that reinforcing the US naval presence in the oil-rich region was a message to Iran, which has defied the international community over its nuclear drive. “The nice thing about my position is I don’t have to explain what the Secretary of Defence said,” said Rear Admiral Kevin M. Quinn, commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, formed by the Stennis and its battle group. “There was no word in my tasking to come over here that had anything to do with Iran,” he told AFP.
Nor did there need to be any.
Posted by Steve White 2007-02-26 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11142 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Probably just there for the fishing. The patagonian toothfish is exceptionally tasty this time of year, I'm told.
Posted by SteveS 2007-02-26 00:52||   2007-02-26 00:52|| Front Page Top

#2 Mad dogs can't be intimidated---only killed.
Posted by gromgoru 2007-02-26 02:58||   2007-02-26 02:58|| Front Page Top

#3 I would say that the real "orders" are still sealed. US objectives in Iran should be achievable by air power alone. Iranians are sick of the Arabist wannabes who plunder their economy. Persia achieved much more that Arabs ever did.
Posted by Sneaze 2007-02-26 04:55||   2007-02-26 04:55|| Front Page Top

#4 Anyway, it's been the kinder, gentler army since clinton, I'd say they're here to help and make people feel all warm and fuzzy. Kinda like Santa Claus, only with fighter jets and JDAM instead of reindeers and gifts. Ho ho ho!
Posted by anonymous5089 2007-02-26 05:29||   2007-02-26 05:29|| Front Page Top

#5 I'd say W has taken a page from the book of Foreign Policy of a former President, the antithesis of Jimmy Carter.
Posted by doc 2007-02-26 07:43||   2007-02-26 07:43|| Front Page Top

#6 The Stennis has joined the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the area, fuelling speculation that Washington could be preparing for a military strike against arch-foe Iran over its controversial nuclear programme.

Let's not talk crazy. The arch-foe of the West is gingivitis.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-02-26 08:59||   2007-02-26 08:59|| Front Page Top

#7 The Stennis has joined the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the area

Bipartisan. I hope Nan appreciates it.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2007-02-26 09:08||   2007-02-26 09:08|| Front Page Top

#8 Of course, they have no plans to intimidate iran, it's just a cruise... sort of "Love boat" redux, actually.

Posted by anonymous5089 2007-02-26 09:26||   2007-02-26 09:26|| Front Page Top

#9 I doubt they're actually 'anchored'.

Should have said "On Station"
Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-02-26 09:49||   2007-02-26 09:49|| Front Page Top

#10 What policy is that, doc?

Speak softly and carry a big JDAM?
Posted by BA 2007-02-26 10:40||   2007-02-26 10:40|| Front Page Top

#11 As the saying goes, I bet butter wouldn't melt in that Captain's mouth.
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-02-26 13:21||   2007-02-26 13:21|| Front Page Top

#12 They aren't there to intimidate them . . . .
Posted by gorb 2007-02-26 15:03||   2007-02-26 15:03|| Front Page Top

#13 "Tis the prob wid Navy steel Bulkheads - you keep talking/demanding from them to know their intentions, they never answer you.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-02-26 20:53||   2007-02-26 20:53|| Front Page Top

#14 D *** nged airframes also don't like answering questionnes - ITS TREASON, THEY TELLS YA, TREASON.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-02-26 20:55||   2007-02-26 20:55|| Front Page Top

#15 Methinks the aircraft in the steel beach picture are conveying a secret message: After all they are (the lately retired) Tomcats: Anytime Baby!
Posted by USN, ret. 2007-02-26 22:56||   2007-02-26 22:56|| Front Page Top

09:27 Warthog
09:11 Mercutio
09:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
08:52 Matt
08:24 Matt
08:20 SteveS
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1
07:22 NN2N1
07:18 trailing wife
07:14 Richard Aubrey
07:10 NN2N1
07:09 Besoeker
07:03 NN2N1
06:58 NN2N1
06:58 Besoeker
05:28 Whiskey Mike









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com