|
2003-06-23 Britain
|
|
Send warships to fight pirates, urges union
|
"Arr, we be hunting pirates! Arr!"
Royal Navy escorts should be sent to the world's most dangerous shipping lanes to protect British commercial vessels from the increasing the threat of piracy, the marine officers' union, Numast, has warned the government.
| Why have a navy if you can't use it to blow pirates out of the water? Yar! |
The plea follows release of the latest figures from the London-based International Maritime Bureau (IMB) which reveal more than 100 attacks on merchant ships in the first three months this year - an 18% rise over the same period last year. Two of the attacks were on UK-flagged ships and three were on UK-controlled or managed vessels. In another incident, British officers on board an Isle of Man-registered supply ship were seized at gunpoint off the coast of Nigeria. They were held hostage and manhandled and had their personal possessions stolen before a ransom was finally paid.
| Hmmm... Lemme see here. What would Drake have done? |
A Numast spokesman said yesterday that there had been "supportive noises" from ministers but no commitments to base warships in high risk areas such as the Malacca Straits, between Malaysia and Indonesia, and off the Horn of Africa. The navy has in the past said a shortage of resources is preventing it sending ships on patrol. "We keep on trying to clarify what the position is for the navy, what they can do and what are the rules of engagement," the Numast spokesman said.
| How 'bout when they run up the Jolly Roger y'keelhaul 'em? Or make a big hole in the water where they used to be? |
"Attacks are running at such a level they pose a direct threat to world trade. We know the Japanese government is considering sending warships to the Malacca Straits to protect its national vessels. The problem is Malaysia and Indonesia have such long coastlines."
You think pirates are a problem? The thought of Japanese warships roaming around escorting merchant ships is apt the give the neighbors flashbacks.
After Numast's annual conference in Harrogate this month, Brian Orrell, the general secretary, declared: "These statistics demonstrate that owners, flag states and coastal authorities are failing to treat this dreadful problem with the priority it deserves. It is essential effective action is taken to provide proper protection to seafarers. Piracy [should be put] back into the history books, where it ought to be in the 21st century." The IMB figures recorded that 145 seafarers were killed, assaulted, kidnapped or missing in the first three months of this year in attacks by pirates. Guns were used in 22 incidents and knives in 39. Other dangerous coastlines include those of Nigeria, Bangladesh and India. Indonesia reported the most attacks. "Avoid anchoring along the Indonesian coast of the [Malacca] Straits," the IMB websites notes. "Coast near Aceh is particularly risky for hijackings."
| Sounds like a particularly rich target environment, if you're a frigate kind of guy... or crew. "How's it feel to be chum, matey? Har har!" |
Somalian waters should be avoided at all costs, the bureau recommends. "Ships not making scheduled calls to ports in these areas should keep at least 75 miles from the coast. Use of radio communications in these waters should be kept to a minimum." The organisation has backed the use of high-voltage electric fences to prevent pirates clambering aboard. A Dutch-made device, which delivers a 9,000-volt shock, is designed to create an "impenetrable barrier of safety" around a vessel.
| "Yar! We be electrifried pirates!" |
"Some seafarers want personal weapons to protect themselves," the Numast official said. "We believe the Royal Navy should return to its historic role, as it did in the 17th and 18th century, protecting British ships from pirates.
Catch a few and hang them from the yardarm, nothing like a little 18th century justice to get their attention. 
|
Posted by Steve 2003-06-23 12:23:26 PM||
||
Front Page|| [11144 views since 2007-05-07]
Top
|
|
Posted by parallaxview 6/24/03 2:50:28 AM||
6/24/03 2:50:28 AM||
Front Page
Top
|
|
14:48 NoMoreBS
14:31 NoMoreBS
14:16 NoMoreBS
14:15 NoMoreBS
14:04 swksvolFF
13:47 Regular joe
13:43 swksvolFF
13:38 swksvolFF
13:34 swksvolFF
13:31 Abu Uluque
13:25 Heribertus Vedente
13:24 mossomo
13:20 Abu Uluque
13:14 mossomo
13:06 swksvolFF
12:51 Grom the Affective
12:31 Abu Uluque
12:20 swksvolFF
12:17 Abu Uluque
12:08 swksvolFF
12:08 ed in texas
12:05 ed in texas
12:01 ed in texas
12:00 ed in texas
|
