Article

2003-05-27 Iran

Who knows how reliable this is, but the Iranians have always shown themselves to be more pragmatic than the Arabs
Al-Qaeda's third-ranked leader and alleged mastermind of the Riyadh bombings has been seized in Iran, intelligence sources say. The United States has identified Saif al-Adel as the most senior al-Qaeda member linked to the attacks that killed 34 people, including one Australian, earlier this month. Iran is thought to want to handover al-Adel to Washington, in return for senior leaders in the anti-Iranian terrorist group, the Khalq (MEK). He would probably be deported to Egypt initially.

Washington has demanded that Iran should act against al-Qaeda leaders in the country and has conveyed a message via the United Nations of its "deep, deep concern that individuals associated with al-Qaeda have planned and directed the attack in Saudi Arabia from inside Iran". Al-Adel's presence in Iran was of particular concern, the US said. If al-Adel is transferred into US hands it will be a serious blow to al-Qaeda and a significant move by Iran in the war on terrorism. It effectively removes what is thought to be one of the few remaining havens for the terrorist group. It is understood that in talks with the Australian Foreign Minister, Alexander Downer, this week, Iran proposed a deal to take significant action on al-Qaeda if the US cracked down on the militant MEK. Formerly funded by Saddam Hussein, the MEK is based in northern Iraq but did not come under heavy attack during the US-led invasion. Iran wants the MEK leadership deported to Tehran for trial over numerous assassinations and bombings. The US is understood to be prepared to remove the leaders from the region, but is reluctant to hand them over to the Iranians.

Most of us here will shed no tears if the trade's made. Saif in our custody would be cause for ululation, and the MKO leadership is just another flavor of Armed Struggleâ¢. We've had enough of that by now that we're gagging on it.

Posted by Paul Moloney 2003-05-27 06:41 pm|| || Front Page|| [11147 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Is it really a good thing for the US to capture Iran's enemies on its behalf?

I'd definitely rather such a trade not be made. Once you decide that a government can't offer fair trials, you don't hand over *anyone* over to it. Especially not ones politically opposed to the regime.

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-05-27 20:07:24|| 2003-05-27 20:07:24|| Front Page Top

#2 The Iranians are smarter than the Arabs. They have something to strive for: nukes soon. The Mullaz are throwing us bones here and there until the first test detonation. The stakes are higher than they look here as some have pointed out. The scary part is that most Persians, including those who hate the theocracy, believe their nation to be worthy of nuke status. We're basically a race to get a rational government in Iran before it nukes up. Events like this buy bits of time for the wackos now in power.

Posted by JAB 2003-05-27 21:50:49|| 2003-05-27 21:50:49|| Front Page Top

18:26 Hellfish
18:23 Hellfish
17:40 swksvolFF
17:34 Ebbuger Whuque4103
17:30 Ebbuger Whuque4103
17:02 Melancholic
16:27 Gravilet Snanter4154
16:20 Chaise Speaking for Boskone7897
16:02 Skidmark
16:01 Skidmark
15:46 Skidmark
15:41 Skidmark
15:37 swksvolFF
15:36 Skidmark
15:34 Skidmark
15:27 Skidmark
14:48 NoMoreBS
14:31 NoMoreBS
14:16 NoMoreBS
14:15 NoMoreBS
14:04 swksvolFF
13:47 Regular joe
13:43 swksvolFF
13:38 swksvolFF