Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 03/14/2020 View Fri 03/13/2020 View Thu 03/12/2020 View Wed 03/11/2020 View Tue 03/10/2020 View Mon 03/09/2020 View Sat 03/07/2020
1
2020-03-14 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Four people at Mar-a-Lago with Trump last weekend have now tested positive for coronavirus
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2020-03-14 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Routine target surveillance tourist curiosity. Nothing to be concerned about here.

Lu Jing, 56, was the second Chinese national to be arrested for trespassing last year at the resort where Trump often visits.

Her prosecution was left to local rather than federal authorities, as the president was not present on Dec. 18 when she entered the property and began taking pictures.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-03-14 03:20||   2020-03-14 03:20|| Front Page Top

#2 Potential false-positive rate among the 'asymptomatic infected individuals' in close contacts of COVID-19 patients

Objective:
As the prevention and control of COVID-19continues to advance, the active nucleic acid test screening in the close contacts of the patients has been carrying out in many parts of China. However, the false-positive rate of positive results in the screening has not been reported up to now. But to clearify the false-positive rate during screening is important in COVID-19 control and prevention.
Methods:
Point values and reasonable ranges of the indicators which impact the false-positive rate of positive results were estimated based on the information available to us at present. The false-positive rate of positive results in the active screening was deduced, and univariate and multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to understand the robustness of the findings.
Results:
When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%, in contrast, the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%. The multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings, with a 75% probability for the false-positive rate of positive results over 47%.
Conclusions:
In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the 'asymptomatic infected individuals' reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-03-14 05:13||   2020-03-14 05:13|| Front Page Top

23:57 Titus Lumplump5936
23:52 Titus Lumplump5936
23:46 ruprecht
23:45 ruprecht
23:27 gorb
23:09 Titus Lumplump5936
23:04 Canuckistan sniper
23:03 Titus Lumplump5936
22:53 Besoeker
22:52 49 Pan
22:52 trailing wife
22:45 Besoeker
22:41 Frank G
22:35 Besoeker
22:09 anymouse
22:04 Alaska Paul
21:44 European Conservative
21:05 trailing wife
21:04 Woodrow
20:56 Woodrow
20:56 swksvolFF
20:54 Woodrow
20:52 Woodrow
20:46 Woodrow









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com