Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 12/24/2019 View Mon 12/23/2019 View Sun 12/22/2019 View Sat 12/21/2019 View Fri 12/20/2019 View Thu 12/19/2019 View Wed 12/18/2019
1
2019-12-24 Home Front: Politix
Senate Options Upon Receiving Articles of Impeachment
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Goober Tingle7365 2019-12-24 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 In my opinion, a trial is unnecessary. The House articles, on their face, are defective. Both fail to meet the constitutional threshold of "high crimes and misdemeanors."

Agreed.

This would negate a trial but does not give the president any formal "acquittal," after a trial on the merits of the articles, which would prove the president’s innocence.

Can we please stop bandying this foolish, ignorant, un-American concept that any citizen, pauper or POTUS, in this country has to prove his innocence?

Do people in this country truly not understand that we are guaranteed, by the highest law of the land and by centuries of precedent, the presumption of innocence?

Trump doesn't need to "prove" anything. That burden rests with the mad hatters and other conspirators who have spent three years subjecting this nation to an unending parade of horseshit on stilts.

ENOUGH. Don't dignify this Shitshow with a response - let alone a trial defense.

Dismiss it forthwith. Option #1 is the only reasonable course of action. To coin a phrase, MoveOn.
Posted by Lex 2019-12-24 01:13||   2019-12-24 01:13|| Front Page Top

#2 Require that it'll be printed with water insoluble ink on toilet paper?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-12-24 03:01||   2019-12-24 03:01|| Front Page Top

#3 #MoveOn soon to be replaced by #F*ckOff
Posted by Mercutio 2019-12-24 07:39||   2019-12-24 07:39|| Front Page Top

#4 Lex is right again. Dismiss at the first opportunity. If we have a trial, are we really sure that Roberts won't screw us? I think not...
Posted by Warthog 2019-12-24 10:08||   2019-12-24 10:08|| Front Page Top

#5 Always remember that Roberts is a Bush appointee and Bushes hate Trump as much as Pelosi does.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-12-24 12:58||   2019-12-24 12:58|| Front Page Top

#6 The articles had to be published in the Congressional Record. Nancy has no use for protocol. Just have Mitch act on the 'record'.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-12-24 15:14||   2019-12-24 15:14|| Front Page Top

#7 Under our system the accused is NOT required to testify in his defense.

The burden of proof is 100% on the prosecution.

These prosecutorial morons can't even define the charges, let alone make a coherent case, let alone meet even a minimal standard of proof.
Posted by Lex 2019-12-24 15:19||   2019-12-24 15:19|| Front Page Top

23:55 Omavimble B. Hayes6869
22:41 ruprecht
22:40 ruprecht
22:33 Nguard
22:33 CrazyFool
22:31 Secret Master
22:16 Lex
21:31 European Conservative
21:15 Mullah Richard
20:54 trailing wife
20:46 John Frum
20:28 Rob Crawford
20:24 Omavimble B. Hayes6869
20:07 M. Murcek
19:44 Spanky Whuter1088
19:42 Bright Pebbles
19:39 Bright Pebbles
19:33 Bright Pebbles
19:02 Goober Tingle7365
19:00 trailing wife
18:19 gorb
18:16 gorb
18:00 lord garth
17:32 Silentbrick









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com