Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/30/2019 View Wed 05/29/2019 View Tue 05/28/2019 View Mon 05/27/2019 View Sun 05/26/2019 View Sat 05/25/2019 View Fri 05/24/2019
1
2019-05-30 Home Front: Politix
Robert Mueller’s ‘final statement’ was a disgraceful mess
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2019-05-30 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [346 views ]  Top

#1 “Charging the president with a crime was not something we could consider,” he reported.

Two years of investigation, $40m down the drain? What was it then, you were doing may I ask ?

Dyed in the wool Clinton operative, reminding the congress of their impeachment duties, without using the work impeachment. Mueller has erased any doubt regarding his objectivity or intentions.

[Asea News] WASHINGTON : ‘It was a coup’: Mueller critics demand ‘deep state’ investigation, Obama testimony Alexander Nazaryan 5 hours ago
Posted by Besoeker 2019-05-30 04:49||   2019-05-30 04:49|| Front Page Top

#2 The Mueller proctology probe was created with a lie by a disgraced FBI director. The phony basis for it was funded by the DNC and HRC. That's the simple version. There is a cast of many others complicit in this treason. This rotting fish needs to be buried deep forever and those who served it up dealt with.

The Dems are dumbos to keep pushing it. It will blowback on them in the coming elections.
Posted by JohnQC 2019-05-30 08:05||   2019-05-30 08:05|| Front Page Top

#3 I wonder if somebody would be so kind as to provide a short list of the President's crimes?

Obstruction of justice by ... what? Suggesting he might fire Mueller? Firing Comey? Sending Valentine's day cards to Putin? Or are we back to the original purpose of the 'probe' - Russian collusion?
Posted by Bobby 2019-05-30 08:34||   2019-05-30 08:34|| Front Page Top

#4 Mueller is wise not to testify before Congress. If somebody like Jim Jordan asked him the really pertinent questions he'd be in trouble.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-05-30 11:36||   2019-05-30 11:36|| Front Page Top

#5 I'm tired of hearing about congress creatures who could / would "ask the tough questions. A person goes into politics because lawyering is just too hard by comparison. When I was a reporter, the newsroom joke was "What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 80? 'Your honor.'"
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-05-30 12:23||   2019-05-30 12:23|| Front Page Top

#6 Sadly, yes, we are accustomed to being disappointed. But I still think it would be interesting to watch Mueller field questions from the other side of the aisle.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-05-30 13:02||   2019-05-30 13:02|| Front Page Top

23:21 Rob Crawford
22:21 Raj
21:23 Frank G
21:05 Vernal Hatrick
21:00 charger
20:37 Snavimble Bucket1794
20:33 chris
20:33 magpie
20:27 KBK
20:13 Skidmark
20:06 Skidmark
20:02 Skidmark
19:53 Deacon Blues
19:48 lord garth
19:46 Deacon Blues
19:44 Deacon Blues
19:02 AlanC
18:52 lord garth
18:50 AlanC
18:00 Frank G
17:58 trailing wife
17:42 JohnQC
17:29 chris
17:28 chris
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com