Article

2017-08-17 Science & Technology

Meet the combat crop duster, armed and armored to join the fight (Video)

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2017-08-17 09:03|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 And bio-warfare missions where they crop dust anthrax on groups of people. Or tear gas to disperse rioting crowds.

Posted by Herb McCoy7309 2017-08-17 09:25|| 2017-08-17 09:25|| Front Page Top

#2 It's not going to replace the A10.

Posted by jpal 2017-08-17 10:11|| 2017-08-17 10:11|| Front Page Top

#3 Useful for exterminating an opium crop. Cut the source of funding. Just saying.

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-08-17 10:14|| 2017-08-17 10:14|| Front Page Top

#4 Just hired one for spraying.
Fantastic aerobat.

Posted by Skidmark 2017-08-17 10:45|| 2017-08-17 10:45|| Front Page Top

#5 Nope, not gonna replace the A10, but very good for fighting against guerrillas and lightly armed enemies. They can go low and slow and loiter over the target area for a very long time and then rain rockets and lead on multiple targets.

Have the A-10 with these in the boxes would be a nice combination to have.

Posted by DarthVader 2017-08-17 10:47|| 2017-08-17 10:47|| Front Page Top

#6 Why not just buy more new A10's . Clearly the greatest ground attack aircraft to date, just buy more.

Posted by NoMoreBS 2017-08-17 11:13|| 2017-08-17 11:13|| Front Page Top

#7 ...one problem. The Air Force. Ever notice it has been trying to kill it for 27 years. They still are. Beyond time to move the mission and force structure to the Army. The Army in turn can give up the next gen attack helicopter which overlaps in mission profiles.

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-08-17 11:19|| 2017-08-17 11:19|| Front Page Top

#8 And these are a hell of a lot cheaper to buy and operate than A-10s. Plus the air force will allow NCOs to fly these. Jets are reserved for the officer elite....

Posted by DarthVader 2017-08-17 11:56|| 2017-08-17 11:56|| Front Page Top

#9 Good for civil war too

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-08-17 12:02|| 2017-08-17 12:02|| Front Page Top

#10 Wow Darth, when has the USAF ever factored cheap into anything it procures?

Posted by NoMoreBS 2017-08-17 12:12|| 2017-08-17 12:12|| Front Page Top

#11 >Why not just buy more new A10's .
A10 costs 17,000 dollars per air hour
these cost about 500

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2017-08-17 12:12|| 2017-08-17 12:12|| Front Page Top

#12 I suppose one could 'paint' a crowd with a UV or RF reactive dispersant, for future retrieval or identification. The CS launchers could do that though.

Posted by Skidmark 2017-08-17 12:19|| 2017-08-17 12:19|| Front Page Top

#13 A10 costs 17,000 dollars per air hour
these cost about 500

What's the F35 going to cost per air hour? The one they claim will replace the A10's mission requirement.

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-08-17 12:54|| 2017-08-17 12:54|| Front Page Top

#14 i ran out of zeros.

The F35 might "paint" targets for these "crop dusters".

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2017-08-17 13:04|| 2017-08-17 13:04|| Front Page Top

#15 That's only if the "crop dusters" don't shoot the F-35 down first! From what I've been reading it seem easier to do than one would think.

Posted by Seeking cure for ignorance 2017-08-17 15:15|| 2017-08-17 15:15|| Front Page Top

#16 #6 Why not just buy more new A10's . Clearly the greatest ground attack aircraft to date, just buy more.
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2017-08-17 11:13

NoMore,

The tooling and jigs for the A-10 were sold for scrap in the early 90s after Fairchild blew a competency gasket trying to build the T-46 Eaglet - a trainer with so many problems and so unstable that it probably would have killed more pilots than it trained. Fairchild had to mortgage everything it had to keep the lights on after the T-46 project went south, and they were paying for the storage on the Hog tooling - USAF hadn't yet decided whether or not to put it in long term storage the way they did with so many other aircraft. Fairchild sold it to save the storage fees and get what they could for scrap, and the USAF didn't lift a finger to stop them.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2017-08-17 17:06|| 2017-08-17 17:06|| Front Page Top

#17 ..well, give one to the Chinese to back engineer, if you want it cheaper, and soon.(do I need to put a /sarc on that?)

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-08-17 17:17|| 2017-08-17 17:17|| Front Page Top

#18 Did they toss the engineering drawings, too?

Posted by Bobby 2017-08-17 18:22|| 2017-08-17 18:22|| Front Page Top

#19 #18 Did they toss the engineering drawings, too?
Posted by: Bobby 2017-08-17 18:22

Bobby,

They pretty much tossed everything that could be used to build a new airframe. It costs money to keep that stuff stored properly, and Fairchild was broke.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2017-08-17 19:25|| 2017-08-17 19:25|| Front Page Top

23:14 Zenobia Floger6220
22:08 Crinegum Ulaigum2776
22:07 Crinegum Ulaigum2776
22:06 Hupeting Sforza8196
22:03 Zenobia Floger6220
21:20 bbrewer126
21:12 phil_b
20:43 Frank G on the Road
20:39 Glenmore
20:34 Frank G on the Road
20:33 Frank G on the Road
20:27 Cravilet Poodle5789
20:15 CrazyFool
20:12 CrazyFool
20:09 gorb
20:08 gorb
20:05 CrazyFool
19:59 Frank G on the Road
19:37 Abu Uluque
19:25 Mike Kozlowski
19:05 charger
18:56 trailing wife
18:54 ed in texas
18:47 Skidmark