Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 12/15/2016 View Wed 12/14/2016 View Tue 12/13/2016 View Mon 12/12/2016 View Sun 12/11/2016 View Sat 12/10/2016 View Fri 12/09/2016
1
2016-12-15 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Joseph Farah: 9 facts you should know about these 'Russian hacks'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-12-15 08:52|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Even if Russia did hack and did influence the election (unproven), why would that Trump's fault? Would not the responsible parties be those who had inadequate IT security? That would be the DNC and various agencies in the Executive branch of the government?
Posted by Glenmore 2016-12-15 09:28||   2016-12-15 09:28|| Front Page Top

#2 The first point in the 9 facts is the only relevant one. The liberals are trying to make it appear voting machines were hacked.

My own points, beyond that one.

(1) Podesta was hacked because he was stupid and careless with secrets.
(2) Emails were released and not a single one has even been denied as untrue.
(3) Hacks were 'once removed' from Russia whatever that means. Painting of the security services as being in lock-step about the hacking is a fiction created by the NY Times.
(4) British Ambassador to Uzbekistan says he was handed a thumb drive of info from a disgruntled Democrat sick of the way the party was treating Bernie and he gave it to Assange.
Posted by rjschwarz 2016-12-15 11:44||   2016-12-15 11:44|| Front Page Top

#3 One very pertinent fact was left off of this list: We know the Democrats lie. They all lie about everything and in all likelihood they are lying about this too.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-12-15 11:56||   2016-12-15 11:56|| Front Page Top

#4 But I thought communism is cool?
Posted by swksvolFF 2016-12-15 12:00||   2016-12-15 12:00|| Front Page Top

#5 If the CIA ever does agree to a hearing with the House, and I were to be a congress-critter, here's question #1 to the Klingon at the microphone:

"Based on your agency's review, are there any emails in this group that are not genuine -- that is, were not written by the people who are listed as the authors of the emails?"

Boy wouldn't that be a fun answer, as the CIA then would have to testify that yes, all these emails came from Hillary, Podesta, Huma, Ms. Cheryl, etc.
Posted by Steve White 2016-12-15 18:09||   2016-12-15 18:09|| Front Page Top

#6 Reset
Posted by P2Kontheroad 2016-12-15 19:07||   2016-12-15 19:07|| Front Page Top

22:36 magpie
21:41 Lionel Gonque2389
21:32 DarthVader
21:29 M. Murcek
21:18 M. Murcek
21:05 Frank G
20:56 Frank G
20:54 Frank G
20:48 Frank G
20:41 Injun Bucket8891
20:40 Frank G
20:40 Injun Bucket8891
20:32 rjschwarz
20:28 rjschwarz
20:27 rjschwarz
20:19 Alaska Paul
19:56 DarthVader
19:46 trailing wife
19:36 USN, Ret.
19:32 USN, Ret.
19:28 USN, Ret.
19:24 USN, Ret.
19:07 P2Kontheroad
19:07 swksvolFF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com