Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 06/06/2016 View Sun 06/05/2016 View Sat 06/04/2016 View Fri 06/03/2016 View Thu 06/02/2016 View Wed 06/01/2016 View Tue 05/31/2016
1
2016-06-06 Home Front: Politix
My Endorsement for President of the United States
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-06-06 15:30|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top

#1 Disappointing post g(r)om. I'll take you at your word that you are 100% serious. I believe that the Vichy French thought much the same way. If you follow your logic, you are in fact, supporting a Hitler-like candidate in the Hildabeast. A candidate much known for her transference. In voting to protect yourself you actually put all of us at risk. I'd rather you not vote at all since you don't align with any candidate. At any rate, don't blame me for anything President Clinton does in office..
Posted by Warthog 2016-06-06 16:55||   2016-06-06 16:55|| Front Page Top

#2 Unless g(r)om is Scott Adams, this is not his endorsement.
Posted by charger 2016-06-06 17:14||   2016-06-06 17:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Ummm, #1 Warthog - That's Scott Adams talking, not grom.

And apparently you missed this paragraph:

"So I’ve decided to endorse Hillary Clinton for President, for my personal safety. Trump supporters don’t have any bad feelings about patriotic Americans such as myself, so I’ll be safe from that crowd. But Clinton supporters have convinced me - and here I am being 100% serious ‐ that my safety is at risk if I am seen as supportive of Trump. So I’m taking the safe way out and endorsing Hillary Clinton for president."

Unfortunately, I suspect he's not as tongue-in-cheek as he usually is.
Posted by Barbara 2016-06-06 18:20||   2016-06-06 18:20|| Front Page Top

#4 The post is clearly titled "My endorsement" and it does not state anywhere the name of Scott Adams. Confusion is understandable when the poster doesn't make it clear.
Posted by Elmavish Panda1401 2016-06-06 21:42||   2016-06-06 21:42|| Front Page Top

#5 Try clicking through, EP, before you draw conclusions, and particularly before you comment.

Also, "h/t Instapundit" is another clue (unless the Blogfadder quotes grom a lot, and I haven't noticed him doing that.)
Posted by Barbara 2016-06-06 21:52||   2016-06-06 21:52|| Front Page Top

#6 Confusion happens -- no big deal. I've made the same mistake as Elmavish Panda1401, and now he won't make it again, which is more than can be said for me.
Posted by trailing wife 2016-06-06 22:01||   2016-06-06 22:01|| Front Page Top

23:56 Zenobia Floger6220
23:43 Shipman
22:01 trailing wife
21:59 Barbara
21:54 Barbara
21:52 Barbara
21:50 trailing wife
21:49 trailing wife
21:42 Elmavish Panda1401
21:38 trailing wife
21:26 Oscar Cromong5167
20:38 Mullah Richard
20:18 Anguper Hupomosing9418
19:26 Sleager Chong1122
19:12 Jort Wittlesbach4106
18:20 Barbara
18:13 Barbara
18:06 Barbara
17:54 Barbara
17:51 Capsu78
17:40 Shipman
17:35 Pappy
17:28 Pappy
17:14 charger









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com