Article

2015-05-29 Iraq

U.S. Saw Islamic State Coming, Let It Take Ramadi

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2015-05-29 02:34|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ] Top
File under: Islamic State

#1 Could it be, Obama is not a total idiot?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2015-05-29 02:50|| 2015-05-29 02:50|| Front Page Top

#2 The build up of ISIS vehicles and equipment on the outskirts of Ramadi would have provided clear tactical intent and represented a highly lucrative target.

The regime's notional war against ISIS continues. Each passing day and ISIS advance confirms the regime's intent to leave the next administration and the Congress a costly, ready-made disaster along with a fragmented Iraq.

Global ISIS advances also provide a massive media diversion as Iranian nuclear weapons issues slip to the back page.

Posted by Besoeker 2015-05-29 02:58|| 2015-05-29 02:58|| Front Page Top

#3 How far is Baghdad from Ramadi again?

Why are we doing anything if we don't want to do everything? Is the traitor-in-chief deliberately trying to keep the pot simmering as Besoeker suggests,for those or other reasons?

Posted by AlanC 2015-05-29 08:37|| 2015-05-29 08:37|| Front Page Top

#4 It should be evident by now, to all who pay attention, that Obama intends to let IS fight it out.
This serves the purpose of putting pressure on Russia, China and most importantly, Iran. We will soon confirm that the wealthy sunni oil states are supporting IS financially.
Most likely, the ultimate goal for Obama is to pass the war onto the next President. Which is probably a better option than boots on the ground now. Why would you want Obama and his political hacks running a war? It's much better having him do "nothing".

Posted by jvalentour 2015-05-29 09:03|| 2015-05-29 09:03|| Front Page Top

Posted by 2015-05-29 09:50|| 2015-05-29 09:50|| Front Page Top

#6 It almost is like Obumble WANTS ISIS to win.

Posted by DarthVader 2015-05-29 11:16|| 2015-05-29 11:16|| Front Page Top

#7 It almost is like Obumble WANTS ISIS to win.

More likely he just doesn't care.

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2015-05-29 11:46|| 2015-05-29 11:46|| Front Page Top

#8 The headline here is a bit deceiving. It insinuates that intentional disregard of specific targets allowed the IS offensive of Ramadi to succeed. Perhaps it’s a difference without distinction but Lakes' analysis suggests that, in general, current ROE has prevented engagement of numerous identifiable targets. Frankly, it’s a larger indictment of the overall strategy (or lack thereof) then the fall of an individual city.

Posted by DepotGuy 2015-05-29 13:49|| 2015-05-29 13:49|| Front Page Top

#9 "intentional disregard of specific targets"is pretty much the same as "current ROE has prevented engagement of numerous identifiable targets" Obama's resistance to ISIS is fake, just for show.

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2015-05-29 14:03|| 2015-05-29 14:03|| Front Page Top

#10 Current authorization to hit targets has US pilots frustrated.

Posted by DarthVader 2015-05-29 14:39|| 2015-05-29 14:39|| Front Page Top

#11 “Nobody really has the control in the tactical environment.”

Reminds me of Jimmuh controlling the hostage rescue or LBJ in Viet Nam.

Posted by AlanC 2015-05-29 15:56|| 2015-05-29 15:56|| Front Page Top

#12 See also FREEREPUBLIC > [BreitBart] WHITE HOUSE: UNITED STATES "NOT RESPONSIBLE" FOR DEFENDING IRAQ.

Great news for IRAN, RUSSIA, CHINA, + US-LED ANTI-US OWG + MARXIST-GLOBALIST WORLD ORDER - NOT good news for NATO-EU, ME Allies, East Asia Allies, GUAM-WESTPAC + even HAWAII, etal.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2015-05-29 19:35|| 2015-05-29 19:35|| Front Page Top

#13 NOT Iraq or ME but similar Bammer, Globalist principle(s) applies ...

* MANILA TIMES > CHINA: NO ONE TELLS US WHAT TO DO.

China FM SpoxBabe Hua Chunying.

CHINA DOING A "PUTIN/RUSSIA" DOING AN "IRAN"???

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > CHINA TURNING MICHIEF REEF INTO HEART OF SOUTH CHINA SEA [Sansha/Sashi Province].

* WAFF > CHINA TO ENGAGE US IN SPRATLYS | [WantChinaTimes] WEAPONS SENT TO CHINA'S HAINAN FOR POTENTIAL [US-China] SOUTH CHINA SEA CONFLICT.

* WORLD NEWS > CHINESE ARTILLERY VEHICLES SPOTTED ON ARTIFICIAL SLAND CREATED IN SOUTH CHINA SEA.
| [Reuters] US SAYS CHINA HAS PLACED MOBILE ARTILLERY ON RECLAIMED ISLAND.

Beijing is denying any placement of Arty on disputed islands, while on its partUS INTEL is now repor that the Arty may had been removed by China to a new locale???

VERSUS

* WORLD MILITARY FORUM > RUSSIAN THINK-TANK: US READY TO SACRIFICE TERRITORY(S) FOR PEACE WITH CHINA LIKE UKRAINE DID WITH CRIMEA, AND WHILE JAPAN PM SHINZO ABE THROWS CONTRARY DIPLOMATIC BALLS.

Moscow Institute for International Relations.

A LOUD, MIGHTY, HOMER SIMPSONIAN "DOH"! MAY YET STILL BE RIGHTEOUSLY HEARD OVER WESTPAC FROM A MADONNA FAN IN GUAM.

* TOPIX > NEW CHINA WHITE PAPER OUTLINE HINTS AT BUILDUP OF ITS NAVAL POWER IN WATERS CLAIMED BY VIETNAM, PHILIPPINES, AND IN OPEN OCEAN.

Again, China's "white ships" off Guam.

OBAMA + GUAM'S "CAMEL ROCK" TO SURRENDER LIKE FRANCE TO CHINA + PLAN.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2015-05-29 20:47|| 2015-05-29 20:47|| Front Page Top

21:36 Frank G
20:47 JosephMendiola
20:42 Blossom Unains5562
20:24 JosephMendiola
20:22 JosephMendiola
19:47 Crazyfool
19:35 JosephMendiola
19:30 JosephMendiola
19:28 Secret Master
19:24 OldSpook
19:17 OldSpook
19:10 OldSpook
19:08 OldSpook
19:06 OldSpook
18:44 gorb
17:34 SteveS
17:21 Bright Pebbles
17:19 Bright Pebbles
16:55 Lampedusa Jones6552
16:53 rjschwarz
16:50 rjschwarz
16:33 DarthVader
16:29 Lowspark
16:02 Lowspark