Article

2013-12-16 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2013-12-16 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ] Top

#1 I notice a word notably absent from this article...

'Pakistan.'

Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2013-12-16 00:04|| 2013-12-16 00:04|| Front Page Top

#2 Both Saudi and Pakistan were involved in 911.

The answer is why?

Posted by Ulusoth Shereter7931 2013-12-16 06:27|| 2013-12-16 06:27|| Front Page Top

#3 http://shoebat.com/2013/04/17/innocent-saudi-has-ties-to-several-al-qaeda-terrorists/

Posted by Paul D 2013-12-16 07:03|| 2013-12-16 07:03|| Front Page Top

#4 The answer is why?

For the Saudis because once we get alternative energy source they will become a footnote in history unless Islma is as strong as possible

About Pakistan because it is a mosaic of peoples who hate one another and whose only bond is Islam. So the more Islam, and the more fascist the better for Pakistan and its rulers.

Posted by JFM 2013-12-16 08:20|| 2013-12-16 08:20|| Front Page Top

#5 I believe there was a story in mid-2000's where an al-qaeda operative was detained but not cooperating. They bagged him and made him believe he was now in the custody of Saudi Arabia. He quickly cooperated and began giving cell phone numbers of a Saudi prince (who later died in the desert) and the head of Pakistan Air Force (who later died in a plane crash). Maybe the Rantburg historin can find the article.

Posted by airandee 2013-12-16 09:28|| 2013-12-16 09:28|| Front Page Top

#6 The answer is why?

Perhaps one should do some research?

In all seriousness, I do have an answer. However, it is rather involved and would run into paragraphs. You would not read it. And in any case, you really don't want an answer.

Posted by Pappy 2013-12-16 10:34|| 2013-12-16 10:34|| Front Page Top

#7 Good topic for one of your excellent Burg editorials. I assure you, I will read it with great interest.

Posted by Besoeker 2013-12-16 10:41|| 2013-12-16 10:41|| Front Page Top

#8 it is rather involved and would run into paragraphs

Mine is rather shorter: because that's what they are.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2013-12-16 10:49|| 2013-12-16 10:49|| Front Page Top

#9 Islam is, and has been, at war against everything not Islam, since its creation. We ignore that fact at our peril. Read Tom Kratmann's "Caliphate". While it's "fiction", there is a great deal of fact in it. It's well past time to fight back, and without both our hands tied behind us and one foot in a bucket. Forget the "civilized war" nonsense and crush the &&^$&%^$ back to being a few families huddled in caves, mostly without even fire. It's the only thing that will stop them.

Posted by Old Patriot 2013-12-16 14:31|| 2013-12-16 14:31|| Front Page Top

#10 Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can't reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law.

How about listing all the countries that weren't involved?

Posted by gorb 2013-12-16 22:56|| 2013-12-16 22:56|| Front Page Top

23:09 Zenobia Floger6220
22:56 gorb
22:51 gorb
22:43 gorb
21:34 Iblis
21:31 Guillibaldo McCoy1948
21:12 JosephMendiola
21:11 Alaska Paul
20:22 JosephMendiola
20:18 rammer
19:18 Besoeker
18:44 KBK
18:23 KBK
18:09 Frank G
18:08 Frank G
17:50 CrazyFool
17:42 Shipman
17:36 Shipman
17:12 Pappy
17:11 Flereth Bourbon2999
16:34 Besoeker
16:28 Frank G
16:13 CrazyFool
15:56 DarthVader