Article

2013-06-15 Home Front: WoT

Accused Fort Hood gunman cannot use defending Taliban defense

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2013-06-15 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top
File under: Salafists

#1 The "Taliban defense" would be an admission of terrorism. We cannot have that.
[sarc off]

Posted by Besoeker 2013-06-15 04:15|| 2013-06-15 04:15|| Front Page Top

#2 It would be an admission of treason in open court and prosecutable as such in either military or civil court.

Posted by Procopius2k 2013-06-15 09:11|| 2013-06-15 09:11|| Front Page Top

#3 I wonder if he's trying for an 'insanity/incompetency' angle?

Posted by Pappy 2013-06-15 14:34|| 2013-06-15 14:34|| Front Page Top

#4 "There was no evidence that there was any immediate threat to others from your fellow soldiers,"

Never mind that that 'others' referred to here are better described as enemy combatants.

Posted by SteveS 2013-06-15 18:26|| 2013-06-15 18:26|| Front Page Top

23:32 Skidmark
23:13 Dale
22:46 KBK
22:15 3dc
21:51 trailing wife
21:49 trailing wife
21:47 Besoeker
21:22 Procopius2k
21:22 trailing wife
21:19 trailing wife
21:13 CrazyFool
20:37 rjschwarz
20:33 rjschwarz
20:32 Uncle Phester
20:17 phil_b
20:08 Redneck Jim
20:07 Procopius2k
20:07 Besoeker
19:59 Redneck Jim
19:51 Redneck Jim
19:43 lex
19:27 Uncle Phester
19:21 Alaska Paul
19:10 Uncle Phester