Article

2011-01-23 Israel-Palestine-Jordan

Guardian publishes secret docs on Israeli-Paleo negotiations

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by ryuge 2011-01-23 15:37|| || Front Page|| [11134 views ] Top

#1 The Al Jazeera angle. The question has to be asked, why did they allow The Guardian to publish before them?
Or did the Guardian stitch them up?

Posted by tipper 2011-01-23 17:29|| 2011-01-23 17:29|| Front Page Top

#2 Yeah, yeah. If I recall, the Palestinians have seven times turned down straightforward offers of sovereignty since the beginning of the past century (two before 1948, I believe), not including interim negotiating positions. The leaked documents detail interim negotiating positions, when the Palestinians had committed to their own people to accept nothing less than everything from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

Interestingly, between a significant drop in birth rate and serious emigration since 1967, there may soon not be enough Palestinians left to make an actual country. The Institute for Zionist Strategies pulled together a nicely readable little report back in 2009.

Posted by trailing wife 2011-01-23 18:03|| 2011-01-23 18:03|| Front Page Top

#3 According to the Jerusalem Post, the WikiLeaks cache only shows the Palestinian side of things. It's terribly odd -- almost looks like Julian Assange is trying to sway public opinion.

Posted by trailing wife 2011-01-23 19:39|| 2011-01-23 19:39|| Front Page Top

#4 In another Jpost article, it is revealed that the Palestinians think this document release by Al Jazeera was intended with malice aforethought.

Posted by trailing wife 2011-01-23 19:54|| 2011-01-23 19:54|| Front Page Top

#5 Malice against the Palestinians, I mean. Al Jazeera may be thrown out of the West Bank in response.

Posted by trailing wife 2011-01-23 19:55|| 2011-01-23 19:55|| Front Page Top

#6 I suuppose this Artic should be no surprise given the well-reported lack of support the Paleos receive from their regional Brothers in Islam. They get assistance when it comes to violently attacking Israel vee Terrstrikes, but not much of anything else.

IOW, HISTORY > suggests that even iff the Paleos get their State, MORE LIKELY THAN NOT THEY'LL HAVE TO ENGAGE IN BILATERAL COOPERATION WID THEIR DESPISED ISRAELI ENEMY FOR THEIR NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.

GREATER IRONY > even iff ISRAEL is indeed per se destroyed one day in the future, REGIONAL MUSLIM HISTORY = IT DOES NOT MEAN THE MUSLIM PALEOS WILL NOW GET TO RULE PALESTINE = THEIR LAND.

{Cheif Wiggum + Lou here].

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-01-23 21:03|| 2011-01-23 21:03|| Front Page Top

#7 Leaks will come from the Paleo side, not the Israeli side, as Israel will only "leak" with is useful to them. Israeli OPSEC is better than that of the US dept of State. Anybodys is.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2011-01-23 21:13|| 2011-01-23 21:13|| Front Page Top

#8 As it was The Guardian that talked Wikileaks into releasing this information in the first place (took 6 consecutive hours of persuasion as I hear the story), it seems that The Guardian is the where we should be focusing our anger.

They are staffed with anti-American political activists posing as journalists.

Posted by crosspatch 2011-01-23 21:49|| 2011-01-23 21:49|| Front Page Top

#9 See also ISRAEL NN > ARAB WORLD WON'T DONATE TO PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-01-23 23:10|| 2011-01-23 23:10|| Front Page Top

23:27 George Hupaviger4591
23:18 JosephMendiola
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:10 JosephMendiola
23:09 JosephMendiola
22:46 rammer
22:16 gromky
22:13 gromky
22:13 gromky
22:10 gromky
21:51 JosephMendiola
21:49 crosspatch
21:40 Bright Pebbles
21:34 JosephMendiola
21:21 Alaska Paul
21:15 JosephMendiola
21:13 Alaska Paul
21:03 JosephMendiola
20:38 gorb
20:34 NoMoreBS
20:31 gorb
20:28 Abu Uluque
20:19 gorb
20:03 Hellfish