Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 12/07/2009 View Sun 12/06/2009 View Sat 12/05/2009 View Fri 12/04/2009 View Thu 12/03/2009 View Wed 12/02/2009 View Tue 12/01/2009
1
2009-12-07 India-Pakistan
Two Dutch diplomats briefly held with arms
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2009-12-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Would you go anywhere in Pakiwakiland unarmed?
Posted by ed 2009-12-07 00:36||   2009-12-07 00:36|| Front Page Top

#2 I agree ed. Sound like the Dutch stock their cars with the vests, grenades. The pistols & ammo are probably assigned to the individuals.
Posted by tipover 2009-12-07 01:33||   2009-12-07 01:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Smith and William, back to Texel for more training. We'll call YOU with your next assignment.
Posted by Besoeker 2009-12-07 07:10||   2009-12-07 07:10|| Front Page Top

#4 Gut feel: just reasonable caution. Handguns, vests, smoke grenades and flash bangs aren't exactly the making of an assault. They are more in line with getting away from something, intact.

Where are the bombs listed? I an getting an error when I go to the page.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2009-12-07 08:37||   2009-12-07 08:37|| Front Page Top

#5 So okay, I hadn't considered that it was routine for diplomats go about Pakiwakiland armed to the teeth -- I figured it was the job of their security detail to do that.
Posted by Steve White 2009-12-07 09:44||   2009-12-07 09:44|| Front Page Top

#6 Sounds like part of the security details' kit anyway Steve.

Posted by Oscar 2009-12-07 10:19||   2009-12-07 10:19|| Front Page Top

#7 Working link hopefully.
Posted by tipper 2009-12-07 12:19||   2009-12-07 12:19|| Front Page Top

#8 "They were unable to provide any justification for being armed and keeping bombs," the sources said.

Why was a diplomatic vehicle searched? Wasn't this a violation of diplomatic immunity? Or does diplomatic immunity not apply to infidels?
Posted by Zhang Fei 2009-12-07 14:55|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com]">[http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2009-12-07 14:55|| Front Page Top

#9 Of course the reason is so they don't have to say,"sure would be nice if we had grenades, don't you think"
Posted by Don Vito Anginegum8261 2009-12-07 17:06||   2009-12-07 17:06|| Front Page Top

#10 Seriously, Dutchmen named Mynheer Smith and Mynheer William? And I agree with Zhang Fe, the policemen had no business searching a diplomat's vehicle, any more than they get to search the embassy.
Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife  2009-12-07 18:01||   2009-12-07 18:01|| Front Page Top

23:34 Cornsilk Blondie
23:13 trailing wife
23:06 USN, Ret.
23:02 trailing wife
22:58 CrazyFool
22:45 USN, Ret.
22:43 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:19 DMFD
21:57 Frank G
21:56 Rambler in Virginia
21:31 USN, Ret.
21:19 gorb
21:17 gorb
21:11 Jinens Lumplump6738
20:51 Boss Snomotle8280
20:40 Procopius2k
20:24 Don Vito Uleash
20:23 AlanC
20:14 AzCat
20:09 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)
19:59 Eric Jablow
19:50 Angleton9
19:48 Eric Jablow
19:47 anymouse









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com