Article

2009-12-02 Afghanistan

Obama's focus on withdrawal could jeopardize Afghan mission

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by ed 2009-12-02 09:07|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 two points

1. When surged in Iraq, anyone who closely followed the discussions knew that the surge troops couldn't be there that long, because of the strain on US ground forces, which was acknowledged by the authors of the surge strategy. Despite that, the insurgents could not simply sit back - for why see point 2

2. If the insurgents choose to sit back for 18 months, they will find at the end of that time a larger and better trained Afghan security force. And probably a stronger afghan economy, governance, etc. Not a good strategy for them, even leaving aside that BHO did NOT promise to take out all US forces, or even all surge forces, in 18 months. He said he would BEGIN a US withdrawl, and THAT is contingent on conditions on the ground.

3. In response to the snark about members of the Int Force leaving. That would be Canada, and they really did overstretch themselves, and need a break.

Posted by liberalhawk 2009-12-02 12:00|| 2009-12-02 12:00|| Front Page Top

#2 oops thats 3 points - yes I can count, but forgot to edit

Posted by liberalhawk 2009-12-02 12:01|| 2009-12-02 12:01|| Front Page Top

#3 Actually, you were initially correct. It's only two points. This one isn't a point.

If the insurgents choose to sit back for 18 months, they will find at the end of that time a larger and better trained Afghan security force

Look back at the previous 18 months. Or the 18 before that. Or the 18 before that. Or add all those months together. 18 months is no time at all when it comes to raising and training a national army in a culture that has a history of not having one.

If anything, it's the precise opposite of what you say. Continuing their attacks will lead to a more experienced ANA with more knowledge of the Talibans operation.

Posted by Mike N. 2009-12-02 12:35|| 2009-12-02 12:35|| Front Page Top

#4 Not all that different from what Bush proposed in Iraq, I guess. A notably uninspirational speech, but given the line he has to walk politically, it's probably the best he could do.

Posted by Glenmore 2009-12-02 12:39|| 2009-12-02 12:39|| Front Page Top

23:43 Old Patriot
23:29 Old Patriot
23:20 Super Hose
22:58 Procopius2k
22:49 Pappy
22:38 trailing wife
22:29 trailing wife
22:29 Dale
22:18 Pappy
22:01 Pappy
21:58 Rhodesiafever
21:54 Pappy
21:49 Pappy
21:41 Rhodesiafever
21:14 Redneck Jim
21:10 Old Patriot
21:00 Old Patriot
20:51 Redneck Jim
20:49 Redneck Jim
20:35 JosephMendiola
20:25 JosephMendiola
20:22 Redneck Jim
20:20 JosephMendiola
20:19 Dar