Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/15/2009 View Wed 10/14/2009 View Tue 10/13/2009 View Mon 10/12/2009 View Sun 10/11/2009 View Sat 10/10/2009 View Fri 10/09/2009
1
2009-10-15 Afghanistan
Taliban Shooting Skills?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2009-10-15 04:35|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 They taught us to stay off the roads. If necessary, find another way around.
Lots of misses, but in between, those vehicles took some hits. RPGs hitting rocky ground kick up rock splinters which are more dangerous than the standard RPG fragmentation effect. There are RPG anti-personnel models, though. Might be as good as a standard anti-tank round hitting rock, too.
Convoy stopped.
No sign of return fire. Hope they got some tac air in, but it wouldn't have happened in four minutes.
Not a bad day's work for the Taliban.
This is not a reason for gloating.
Posted by Richard Aubrey">Richard Aubrey  2009-10-15 08:19||   2009-10-15 08:19|| Front Page Top

#2 Since the RPGs are consistently undershooting the trucks, did they set up their ambush too far away?

Al
Posted by Frozen Al 2009-10-15 11:29||   2009-10-15 11:29|| Front Page Top

#3 CROWS and incoming fire radar should stop those sort of things, as this video is old, it probably has.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2009-10-15 12:39||   2009-10-15 12:39|| Front Page Top

#4 Bright. Incoming fire radar doesn't work until the stuff is incoming. Problem is getting hit until you can return fire accurately.
Six guys, one medium machine gun, a dozen RPG rounds stops and damages a US/NATO/ISAF/ANA convoy. Half the gomers get away. They win.
Posted by Richard Aubrey">Richard Aubrey  2009-10-15 13:17||   2009-10-15 13:17|| Front Page Top

#5 Got to agree to Richard Aubrey, I guess.

No sign of return fire.
US/NATO/ISAF/ANA convoy.

Civilian convoy? The lack of return fire is very weird.
Posted by anonymous5089 2009-10-15 16:11||   2009-10-15 16:11|| Front Page Top

#6 They taught us to stay off the roads. If necessary, find another way around.

In a mountainous area, going could mean a additional day's worth of travel, couldn't it?
Posted by Zhang Fei 2009-10-15 17:51|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com]">[http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2009-10-15 17:51|| Front Page Top

#7 #6.
wrt going around. In part, I was trying to be facetious. But this road is ambush heaven. They can't go fast, can't reverse, can't turn around. There are no ditches for cover,nor vegetation.
But if it took another day, that would be getting there sooner than getting blown up and not getting there at all.
But, given the terrain, it's probably another road like this one.
Posted by Richard Aubrey">Richard Aubrey  2009-10-15 17:53||   2009-10-15 17:53|| Front Page Top

#8 No sign of return fire.

The video is way too far way and grainy to see .30 and .50 cal muzzle flashes. No way those humvees are not returning fire. It's a multipoint ambush.

CROWS and incoming fire radar

Yep, remote turrets w/ infrared optics slaved to audio gunfire detectors.
Posted by ed 2009-10-15 20:26||   2009-10-15 20:26|| Front Page Top

23:51 JosephMendiola
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:49 ed
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:31 trailing wife
23:28 trailing wife
23:24 USN, Ret.
23:21 USN, Ret.
22:48 USN, Ret.
21:52 rjschwarz
21:23 Pappy
20:50 phil_b
20:47 gorb
20:39 Procopius2k
20:39 Frank G
20:37 Frank G
20:33 gorb
20:32 trailing wife
20:29 ed
20:26 ed
20:11 ed
20:01 Procopius2k
19:59 rjschwarz
19:58 Nimble Spemble









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com