Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/02/2009 View Thu 10/01/2009 View Wed 09/30/2009 View Tue 09/29/2009 View Mon 09/28/2009 View Sun 09/27/2009 View Sat 09/26/2009
1
2009-10-02 Home Front: Politix
Pawlenty preps 2012 campaign team
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2009-10-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 He's not my dream candidate by any means, but he doesn't have any major flaws and his temperment is exceptional. He nevers loses his cool or shows frustration in public. That could be an important advantage for him against Romney.
Posted by Mike N. 2009-10-02 00:36||   2009-10-02 00:36|| Front Page Top

#2 We have a dreamy president right now. I think a normal person would be great for a change.
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2009-10-02 08:46||   2009-10-02 08:46|| Front Page Top

#3 I'd vote for him on the boring factor alone.

As for Romney, hell no.
Posted by Maggie Glavinter3150 2009-10-02 08:57||   2009-10-02 08:57|| Front Page Top

#4 I voted for Romney over the cranky old man in the Illinois primary. I'm not adverse to Romney but Pawlenty looks good. Pawlenty/Palin? Might work.
Posted by Steve White 2009-10-02 10:59||   2009-10-02 10:59|| Front Page Top

#5 Palin/Pawlenty would work better.

The people want real change. And not the change Zero has delivered. The winner in 12 will be the candidate who runs against their own party as hard as tehy run against their opponent. I suspect Palin's book will start the processas she runs against the Republican party for it's nomination.
Posted by Gloger Hapsburg8576 2009-10-02 11:50||   2009-10-02 11:50|| Front Page Top

#6 Is Pawlenty a Large "C" Creationist?

I believe he has made comments to this effect in the past.

If so, he's DOA, no matter what his other qualifications.

It bothers me not one whit if he is one. I'm not a large "C" creationist and I don't believe in Biblical literalism, but nor am I angry or offended or threatened by it. If that's what someone thinks, whatever. I simply disagree. I'd vote for someone who was a creationist without too much trouble.

But a person who is one can't win, guys.
Posted by no mo uro 2009-10-02 16:02||   2009-10-02 16:02|| Front Page Top

23:59 Maggie Ebbuter2991
23:59 Redneck Jim
23:53 Redneck Jim
23:45 Redneck Jim
23:41 Redneck Jim
23:39 Redneck Jim
23:39 Old Patriot
23:39 trailing wife
23:36 Old Patriot
23:32 Old Patriot
23:30 Redneck Jim
23:29 Redneck Jim
23:26 Redneck Jim
23:15 49 Pan
23:06 tipover
22:59 Redneck Jim
22:32 Woozle Uneter9007
22:20 Barbara Skolaut
22:11 Old Patriot
22:01 Redneck Jim
21:41 lotp
21:22 CrazyFool
20:49 Gruse Brown5488
20:45 Gruse Brown5488









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com