Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 06/11/2009 View Wed 06/10/2009 View Tue 06/09/2009 View Mon 06/08/2009 View Sun 06/07/2009 View Sat 06/06/2009 View Fri 06/05/2009
2009-06-11 Terror Networks
Terrorists' 'Right to Remain Silent?'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2009-06-11 11:05|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [336078 views ]  Top

#1 and they call GWB a dumbass
Posted by funky skunk 2009-06-11 13:31||   2009-06-11 13:31|| Front Page Top

#2 SOLUTION......TAKE NO PRISONERS!! I'm a very simplified kind a guy.
Posted by Jarong de Medici3580 2009-06-11 14:58||   2009-06-11 14:58|| Front Page Top

#3 The first time a US Soldier gets killed trying to recite Miranda rights to a prisoner, Obambi needs to be impeached and locked away for murder. There WILL be consequences for failure. Our current "president" is doing everything he can to make Jimmah Kahtuh look like a genius.
Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot  2009-06-11 17:53||]">[]  2009-06-11 17:53|| Front Page Top

#4 OP, they won't be killed while reading the perp their Miranda rights. First of all, it is the FBI that reads them their rights. By that time, the military has secured the terrorist, so they will not be a threat.
The problem comes when the terrorists just clam up, because they know that we can't really hurt or kill them. All they have to do is sit it out, and eventually we will release them unharmed, to go back to jihad.
I, too, am in favor of taking no prisoners. While that has other problems (people know that the US won't capture them alive will fight harder, trying to take some more Americans with them), it also solves the problem of treating terrorists like simple white collar criminals.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2009-06-11 20:06||   2009-06-11 20:06|| Front Page Top

#5 reading a terrorist miranda over in Bagram? WTF kind of stupidity is this. Bagram was NATO last time I checked, so we are affording these swine U.S. Const rights while capturing them on battlefields in other countries? Obambi makes Jimmuh Carter look like a rhodes scholar.
Posted by Broadhead6 2009-06-11 21:46||   2009-06-11 21:46|| Front Page Top

#6 (people know that the US won't capture them alive will fight harder, trying to take some more Americans with them)

given the brainwashing in the madrassahs, isn't it likely they're already taught this?
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2009-06-11 21:54||   2009-06-11 21:54|| Front Page Top

#7 give them the right too reamin silent with a bullet too the head
Posted by funky skunk 2009-06-11 22:34||   2009-06-11 22:34|| Front Page Top

#8 So incrementally we will bring a millions plus Jihadists to trail in the USA and some getting a few years in jail..then what? Coming to your neighborhood since their country of birth doesn't have human rights standard like wimpy America. Now that's what I call true Democratic Party visionary thinking to enlist new voters.
Posted by HammerHead 2009-06-11 23:14||   2009-06-11 23:14|| Front Page Top

23:42 trailing wife
23:41 OldSpook
23:41 OldSpook
23:36 Laurence of the Rats
23:18 Procopius2k
23:14 HammerHead
23:09 CrazyFool
23:06 Pappy
22:55 Pappy
22:37 funky skunk
22:36 funky skunk
22:34 funky skunk
22:34 mom
22:33 funky skunk
22:29 eLarson
22:29 trailing wife
22:21 3dc
22:12 European Conservative
22:08 European Conservative
22:02 KBK
21:54 Frank G
21:51 3dc
21:49 KBK
21:48 trailing wife

Search WWW Search