Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 02/02/2009 View Sun 02/01/2009 View Sat 01/31/2009 View Fri 01/30/2009 View Thu 01/29/2009 View Wed 01/28/2009 View Tue 01/27/2009
1
2009-02-02 Iraq
Obama praises Iraqis on provincial elections
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2009-02-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Hypocricy personified.
Posted by Besoeker 2009-02-02 08:48||   2009-02-02 08:48|| Front Page Top

#2 He should be against the provincial elections?

I for one, am glad its now politically correct to cheer progress in Iraq.
Posted by liberalhawk 2009-02-02 12:29||   2009-02-02 12:29|| Front Page Top

#3 Well then you, for one, LH, don't understand much about politics or policy. Or the lightweights and worse now in charge. They won't initiate needed policies, they won't sustain them against unwarranted opposition, and by flip-flopping on all sorts of crucial matters without paying a price they confirm the robustness of the orwellian inversion of information that brought them to power.

We're talking here about their need to instantly jettison ridiculous positions that materially damaged the national interest for years - because of their fear of something going wrong. Being "politically correct" is to be mindless and misinformed, not to mention obsessively self-righteous in embrace of the accepted bigotries. You welcome what is a temporary and superficial boost to the atmospherics, when the threat to the substance is undiminished, and will only grow so long as facts are not faced honestly.

Posted by Verlaine 2009-02-02 12:36||   2009-02-02 12:36|| Front Page Top

#4 LH, it'll be difficult to credit the mirrorball until he and his minions cut out the prefatory throat-clearings about the evils of the prior administration. Like Cordesman's crap today about Afghanistan, it seems as if they can't address policy questions any more without a ritual denunciation of prior practice - even if the policy to be mooted is just a continuation of the prior policy.
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2009-02-02 13:04|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2009-02-02 13:04|| Front Page Top

23:57 JosephMendiola
23:39 JosephMendiola
23:20 JosephMendiola
23:14 JosephMendiola
23:09 tipover
23:08 JosephMendiola
23:05 rabid whitetail
22:58 rabid whitetail
22:57 rabid whitetail
22:57 Alaska Paul
22:57 rabid whitetail
22:56 rabid whitetail
22:55 rabid whitetail
22:54 JosephMendiola
22:54 Barbara Skolaut
22:52 rabid whitetail
22:50 Alaska Paul
22:45 Alaska Paul
22:44 Chemist
22:43 Alaska Paul
22:40 JosephMendiola
22:39 Alaska Paul
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:35 A_Rovian_Desciple









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com