Article

2008-12-17

Good morning

Posted by Fred 2008-12-17 09:50|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 And Leslie has legs.

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2008-12-17 10:05|| 2008-12-17 10:05|| Front Page Top

#2 Ship shape, from top to bottom.

Posted by Richard of Oregon 2008-12-17 10:33|| 2008-12-17 10:33|| Front Page Top

#3 She definitely had legs along with other assets.

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2008-12-17 11:25|| 2008-12-17 11:25|| Front Page Top

#4 [I am such a dipshit!]

Posted by MarkZM 2008-12-17 11:30|| 2008-12-17 11:30|| Front Page Top

#5 Poor quality of trolls today, eh, Fred? ;-p

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-12-17 13:02|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-12-17 13:02|| Front Page Top

#6 I'm definitely liking Our Miss Brooks.

Posted by Mike 2008-12-17 14:43|| 2008-12-17 14:43|| Front Page Top

#7 Having one half nude girl in the Good Morning article is OK for me but since a few weeks Rantburg is starting to look like a "not for family" site and NSFW site.

Would it be possible to stop this trend?

PS: I love the two additional photos but I would prefer they were on a link we would have to click in order to dsiplay the photo.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2008-12-17 14:48|| 2008-12-17 14:48|| Front Page Top

#8 Family friendly stories in today's Rantburg

Sudan: Some 250 people killed in tribal festivities
Taliban issue video of beheaded 'spies'
7 Pak Talibs banged in Mohmand
Iraq: Bomb attack targets minister in Baghdad
Iranian artillery shells border regions in Sulaimaniya
Middle East: Rockets strike Israel from Gaza after West Bank killing
Three gunned down in southern Thailand
Iran police officer killed in border clash

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2008-12-17 17:08|| 2008-12-17 17:08|| Front Page Top

#9 JFM, I addressed this yesterday.

Mod note: to all who post pics, remember, we don't want NSFW pics in comments -- or in articles. It creates problems, and we don't need problems.

A simple rule: if you'd get in trouble if someone (spouse, boss, etc) saw the pic on your computer, then don't upload it.

Thanks, AoS

Posted by Steve White 2008-12-17 18:54|| 2008-12-17 18:54|| Front Page Top

#10 No mention of dawgs....

Posted by .5MT 2008-12-17 19:54|| www.cybernations.net]">[www.cybernations.net] 2008-12-17 19:54|| Front Page Top

#11 ïûòàþñü ïîäïèñàòüñÿ, íî ðññ ïî÷åìó-òî â êðèâîé êîäèðîâêå âûäàåò :( ÷òî ÿ äåëàþ íå òàê? Õåëï

Posted by JamesXJ">JamesXJ 2008-12-17 23:18|| 2008-12-17 23:18|| Front Page Top

#12 excellent argument, JamesXJ, but I would quibble on your positin on school vouchers

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2008-12-17 23:39|| 2008-12-17 23:39|| Front Page Top

#13 Steve

I fact none of the photos taken individually is NSFW but when you have a five or six of them in a single page it ends being so.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2008-12-17 23:57|| 2008-12-17 23:57|| Front Page Top

23:58 eltoroverde
23:57 JFM
23:57 Abu do you love
23:55 Snogum Guelph7607
23:53 Jolutch Mussolini7800
23:39 Frank G
23:34 rjschwarz
23:33 lftbhndagn
23:18 JamesXJ
23:16 Frank G
23:08 Frank G
23:05 Barbara Skolaut
23:02 Danielle
22:57 Cornsilk Blondie
22:55 Frank G
22:36 Frank G
22:32 gorb
22:25 tipper
22:21 Cornsilk Blondie
22:18 tu3031
22:17 Rambler in Virginia
22:15 Frank G
22:15 Frank G
22:14 Frank G