Article

2008-03-31 Olde Tyme Religion

Showing Islamic Verses/Rhetoric/Deeds in film is "Anti-Islam"

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2008-03-31 14:06|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ] Top

#1 "It's a hatchet job," said Yvonne Haddad, a professor of Muslim-Christian relations at Georgetown University. "In the Koran there are verses that are very accomodating, very open, very pluralistic to other religions. . . . It was not a balanced representation," she said.

Sure. I mean he doesn't show them celebrating in the streets and passing out candy to the kiddos and all that good stuff. Of course they only do that when one of the chosen ones puts an airplane through a skyscraper or blows up a bus full of Joooos, but, hey, they're a complicated people...

Posted by tu3031 2008-03-31 15:21|| 2008-03-31 15:21|| Front Page Top

#2 heh, heh - right now you are getting advertising from the "leading Muslim marriage advisors".

Must mean they are reading you.

Posted by Woodrow Slusorong7967 2008-03-31 15:33|| 2008-03-31 15:33|| Front Page Top

#3 heh- couldn't help myself, I clicked. Most women covered but one photo of newlyweds with the female EXPOSING her hair. Maybe the purpose is to better educate her on how to be a good wife.

Posted by Woodrow Slusorong7967 2008-03-31 15:35|| 2008-03-31 15:35|| Front Page Top

#4 "In the Koran there are verses that are very accomodating, very open, very pluralistic to other religions. . . . It was not a balanced representation," she said.

Mhw or an other Koran-savvy RBer will correct, but as far as I know the "tolerant/spiritual/religious" verses are from the mecca period, and the "intolerant/lawmaking/warmongering" ones from the medina one; and since the Koran is not a book as we western understand the word (rather, a support for something to be rote-learned in arabic, as arabic is the language spoken by allan), full of contradiction, with no logical order except the size of verses, muslim scholars had to determine which verse was appliable, and which was not.
And, basically, and this is islam 101, the earlier mecca verses are abrogated and replaced by the later medina ones. So, the "very accomodating, very open, very pluralistic to other religions" simply are not to be used, as allan changed his mind and the core of the Koran is those supremacist, bellicose, intolerant verses (plus all the silly stuff about heritage, wordly matters,...) straight from the mouth of a 7th century arab warlord/gangleader.
Either yvonne is naive and doesn't know the subject of her studies (unlikely), or she is just plain dishonest and/or self-deluded.

Posted by anonymous5089 2008-03-31 15:38|| 2008-03-31 15:38|| Front Page Top

#5 I see the typical dhimi useful idiots are out in force trying to whitewash Islam again.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2008-03-31 16:03|| 2008-03-31 16:03|| Front Page Top

#6 Yvonne works for Georgetown's Alwaleed Center for Educating the Next Generation of Foreign Service Useful Idiots, so my vote is for dishonest/deluded, but mostly dishonest.

Posted by Seafarious 2008-03-31 16:14|| 2008-03-31 16:14|| Front Page Top

#7 Yvonne Haddad grew up in Syria. She knows about muslims, but I would guess she was raised in a Baath household. Her hatred for the west overrides her concerns, if any, about muslims. While she professes to Christianity, I would look to her husband to know what religion she really identifies with. What better revenge than to destroy the west from within and get paid very well doing it.

Posted by ed 2008-03-31 16:27|| 2008-03-31 16:27|| Front Page Top

#8 Ok, here is what I noticed - these peaceful and toloerant verses and suras are never cited. Because, I couldn't find them - please point them out Yvonne. If it is so accomidating then why are there security concerns?

Posted by swksvolFF 2008-03-31 16:44|| 2008-03-31 16:44|| Front Page Top

#9 For cryin' out loud--he film is no big deal after being here in Rantburg for the past several years. Bidness as usual in the fanatical world of jihad . . . I liked the short piece, and people really oughta wake up. When the Moslems say they're going to take over Western society--THEY MEAN IT. 20 years ago they were telling me they were going to destroy the World Trade Center, and had it in their minds that it was some cover or secrect base of of the US govt. I agree with Wilders--they are retarded.

Posted by ex-lib 2008-03-31 17:32|| 2008-03-31 17:32|| Front Page Top

#10 It would be interesting to make a film showign the beheadings and such and put peaceful slogans from the koran beside them. Nice juxtaposition, and fairly accurate to Islam.

Fact is a religion is what it's worshipers do. Islam is a violent religion accompanied by those that tacitly support that violence with their silence.

Posted by rjschwarz 2008-03-31 18:08|| 2008-03-31 18:08|| Front Page Top

#11 No other major religion incites its people to blow themselves up in the midst of innocent crowds. That's not surprising coming from a religion started by a murdering, robbing, raping pedophile. Any Muslim who isn't condemning this stuff publicly is quietly in accord. The people who truly speak for Islam are the bombers and head-choppers; the rest are fellow-travelers.

I think payback is coming, and when it does, it's going to be really rough on them. They'll have no one but themselves to blame, either.

Posted by Pancho Elmeck8414 2008-03-31 18:28|| 2008-03-31 18:28|| Front Page Top

23:49 JosephMendiola
23:18 JohnQC
23:11 JohnQC
23:09 JohnQC
23:08 JohnQC
23:07 Glenmore
23:06 Steve White
23:04 Hillary
22:58 JohnQC
22:55 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:39 eltoroverde
22:30 Injun Unereck9646
22:28 JosephMendiola
22:23 Nanook of the North (the little Eskimo boy)
22:22 Spoluse Ghibelline1686
22:21 Unique Battle
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:15 Thush Gonque
22:06 BA
21:51 Skunky Glins5285
21:50 BA
21:38 JDB
21:30 Pappy
21:26 Pappy