Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 01/28/2008 View Sun 01/27/2008 View Sat 01/26/2008 View Fri 01/25/2008 View Thu 01/24/2008 View Wed 01/23/2008 View Tue 01/22/2008
1
2008-01-28 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iranian Op-ed Calls For Worldwide Attacks
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2008-01-28 08:21|| || Front Page|| [13 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Iran 

#1 Any bets on how big a play this gets in the MSM or Congress?

Maybe one of the candidates will bring it up.

Anyone?
Posted by AlanC 2008-01-28 08:44||   2008-01-28 08:44|| Front Page Top

#2 Now Hossein, you got me all wrong---I do not support Israel.
Posted by Ehud Olmert 2008-01-28 09:07||   2008-01-28 09:07|| Front Page Top

#3 This sort of crap should be treated as a declaration of war and dealt with accordingly. These savages should be afraid of us. But we will do nothing.
Posted by Excalibur 2008-01-28 09:19||   2008-01-28 09:19|| Front Page Top

#4 Our politicians will do nothing until we get hit. Again. And again. Then they will blame Bush.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2008-01-28 09:55||   2008-01-28 09:55|| Front Page Top

#5 How about we make them change their policies
Posted by Enver Phusomp9341 2008-01-28 10:24||   2008-01-28 10:24|| Front Page Top

#6 Death to America is just a call for a personal internal struggle.

They don't want to hurt anybody.
Posted by danking70 2008-01-28 10:46||   2008-01-28 10:46|| Front Page Top

#7 Can we nuke the Kabaa now?
Posted by mojo">mojo  2008-01-28 10:51||   2008-01-28 10:51|| Front Page Top

#8 A few hundred thousand carefully conceived kills would renew the gasping fear a superpower should command, but for some reason doesn't have the will to. The British empire existed quite happily for a couple hundred years using that, and other, simple techniques.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-01-28 12:22||   2008-01-28 12:22|| Front Page Top

#9 A few hundred thousand carefully conceived kills would renew the gasping fear a superpower should command...

Yeah, and about 10,000 to 15,000 kills here would go a long way to shutting up the damn commies in our midst!

First the traitors, then the enemy!
Posted by Big Phomotch6468 2008-01-28 12:40||   2008-01-28 12:40|| Front Page Top

#10  Shar'iatmadari stressed that American and European civilians must be harmed in these attacks, so as to make the U.S. and the European countries change their policy towards Israel
and they should know that we'd threaten to blow up Mecca if they do.
Fight fire with fire
what's sad is they would be more upset with our blowing up Mecca than killing people, sad how they don't value life.
Posted by Jan from work 2008-01-28 13:51||   2008-01-28 13:51|| Front Page Top

#11 Just more evidencias/indicias that OSAMA > NO US
-WEST VERSUS ISLAM-ISLAMISM, ALL-OUT, "VICTORY OR DEATH/RULE OR DIE" END-TIMES APOCALYPTIC WAR IN IRAN = WAR AGZ US-WEST WILL GO ON INDEFINITELY, at least fir the duration of OSAMA's [+ prob ZAWI's, OMAR's, etc.] aligned, lifetime(s).

The official Iran websites are full of news and views denoting that DUBYA = USA can't or won't do anythiong anymore agz Iran = Iran's nuke ambitions. Many anticipate that a US DEMOCRAT will win the 2008 POTUS elex, and either make peace or unilater withdraw from the ME. IONW, ISLAM = RADICAL ISLAMISM WINS.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-01-28 18:13||   2008-01-28 18:13|| Front Page Top

#12 RIAN/TOPIX > THE US WILL NOT ATTACK IRAN, but will try to prevent5 Iran from dev nuclear weapons ala MICHAEL CHERTOFF.

WORLD is once again reminded, by this artiiikle and many preceding, that IRAN DESIRES = HOLDS TENDER FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF UP TO 19 MORE NUC REACTORS.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-01-28 19:01||   2008-01-28 19:01|| Front Page Top

#13 LUCIANNE/TOPIX > BUSH: WE WILL CONFRONT IRAN IFF NECESSARY. USA will defend its troops, defend its Allies, and defend its interests in the Gulf or anywhere, TO INCLUDE PROTECTING/DEFENDING ITS TROOPS IN IRAQ.

IOW, IMO/IIRAC DUBYA is engaging in his version of [Reagan-era]FLEXIBLE RESPONSE vv CONVENTIONAL WAR AGZ IRAN. "Justification" for a unilateral US mil response may stem from any incident, from HORMUZ-style NAVAL CLASHES AGZ IRGC GUERILLA NAVY, to IRAN-ORDERED/SUPPOR CONTINUING ATTACKS AGZ US-ALLIED MILFORS INSIDE IRAQ, .........@etc.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-01-28 19:12||   2008-01-28 19:12|| Front Page Top

23:27 Alaska Paul
23:14 Alaska Paul
23:05 trailing wife
23:04 gromky
23:02 JosephMendiola
23:01 trailing wife
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:54 Redneck Jim
22:54 Pappy
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:48 Redneck Jim
22:46 Redneck Jim
22:45 Thravick Forkbeard3564
22:40 Crazyhorse
22:37 Redneck Jim
22:35 Skunky Phuter6558
22:32 Redneck Jim
22:22 Redneck Jim
22:20 Glenmore
22:18 Redneck Jim
22:17 Icerigger
22:12 Pappy
22:11 Redneck Jim
22:07 Redneck Jim









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com