Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 10/13/2007 View Fri 10/12/2007 View Thu 10/11/2007 View Wed 10/10/2007 View Tue 10/09/2007 View Mon 10/08/2007 View Sun 10/07/2007
1
2007-10-13 Home Front: WoT
Terror suspect says FBI spied on his library computer use
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2007-10-13 08:22|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top
 File under: al-Qaeda 

#1 According to the Library Journal:

U.S. Attorney David Nahmias responded in a statement to the AP that "The FBI's actions were lawful and appropriate as we will demonstrate when we respond to the motion in court," adding that "public libraries are not safe havens for terrorist-related activity."
Many libraries have equipped their computers to automatically clear each user’s history after a session. Obviously the Chestatee Regional Library in Dawsonville, GA did not have this feature.
The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom advises librarians, “If the agent or officer does not have a court order compelling the production of records, the library director should explain the library’s confidentiality policy and the state’s confidentiality law, and inform the agent or officer that users' records are not available except when a proper court order in good form has been presented to the library."
Problem here is wasn't necessary to ask the library to produce records. Ahmed left his activity records out in public for anyone to view. How does this differ from, say, a note pad or paper that he had abandoned on the desk or tossed in the waste basket?

Posted by GK 2007-10-13 11:02||   2007-10-13 11:02|| Front Page Top

#2 I'm impressed. I've been despairing of our competence in finding and arresting terrorists in our country. Sounds like at least one office of the FBI is on the ball. Good job!
Posted by Steve White">Steve White  2007-10-13 12:14||   2007-10-13 12:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Ahmed had the option of clearing his browser's history. By abandoning the computer—with that record intact and available to any new user—he thereby relinquished any right to privacy regarding that information. He might as well have dropped his personal address book on a public sidewalk.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-10-13 14:03||   2007-10-13 14:03|| Front Page Top

#4 It does say "PUblic LIbrary right on the front, that means ANYBODY, FBI included, he's a moron.

His lawyer is incompetent, Wiretapping my ass.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-10-13 14:18||   2007-10-13 14:18|| Front Page Top

#5 any right to privacy

I should have used the official legal yardstick, "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy".
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-10-13 14:54||   2007-10-13 14:54|| Front Page Top

23:48 Zenster
23:42 Zenster
23:29 Karl Rove, evil genius
23:26 Alaska Paul
23:23 twobyfour
23:22 ed
23:07 Zenster
23:06 ed
23:05 Karl Rove, evil genius
23:05 Frank G
23:01 BA
22:42 whitecollar redneck
22:38 Zenster
22:37 ed
22:09 Neville Phereng4211
22:08 trailing wife
22:07 JohnQC
22:03 JohnQC
22:03 JohnQC
22:00 JohnQC
21:55 john frum
21:54 JohnQC
21:49 Dave D.
21:42 lotp









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com