Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/12/2007 View Thu 10/11/2007 View Wed 10/10/2007 View Tue 10/09/2007 View Mon 10/08/2007 View Sun 10/07/2007 View Sat 10/06/2007
1
2007-10-12 Iraq
Osprey's debut in combat zone has rocky start
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2007-10-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Maj. Eric Dent, an Osprey spokesman at Marine Corps Headquarters in Washington, declined to identify the problem.

"We'll leave that task to the New York Times."
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-10-12 00:30||   2007-10-12 00:30|| Front Page Top

#2 A malfunction forced one of the 10 Ospreys deployed to Iraq to land in Jordan on Thursday.

So the other nine are fine?
Posted by trailing wife 2007-10-12 03:27||   2007-10-12 03:27|| Front Page Top

#3 $20 billion tilt-rotor plane

Ha?
Posted by gromgoru 2007-10-12 05:54||   2007-10-12 05:54|| Front Page Top

#4 They could be referring to the total cost of development for x number of planes, whilst still making it seem ridiculously expensive.

Or it could be a typo.
Posted by Bobby 2007-10-12 06:48||   2007-10-12 06:48|| Front Page Top

#5 Good work MAJ Dent! Just remember, get it right... or YOU'LL be flying the next one of these damn things into al-Asad for the long course.
Posted by Besoeker 2007-10-12 07:08||   2007-10-12 07:08|| Front Page Top

#6 piece of shit should have been scrapped 25 years ago
Posted by  sinse 2007-10-12 11:09||   2007-10-12 11:09|| Front Page Top

#7 We're missing a 'Turkey' graphic.
Posted by mcsegeek1 2007-10-12 11:56||   2007-10-12 11:56|| Front Page Top

#8 One of the worrying aspects of the Osprey is that it leaks (and burns) oil. Apparently that is a feature, not a defect (a side effect of having the tilt rotors). I can't help but wonder what effect that has on reliability and safety under fire.

Al
Posted by Frozen Al 2007-10-12 17:03||   2007-10-12 17:03|| Front Page Top

#9 3.5 times the price of the CH-47 plus $20 billion in R&D. What's not to like if you are Bell and Boeing or a congressman bringing home the bacon? $20B will buy near 700 CH-47F at $30M a piece.
Posted by ed 2007-10-12 17:20||   2007-10-12 17:20|| Front Page Top

#10 WAFF.com/DEFENSE ENWS > US Army-DOD has reportedly narrowed the number of advanced [future]tilt-rotor transport designs from five to three. As said or inferred before, the primary utility of the OSPREY is to gener serve as a real-time testbed and learning curve for more capable follow-on designs.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-10-12 19:43||   2007-10-12 19:43|| Front Page Top

#11 Iff the US Navy goes thru and successfully devs its SEA BASING/MOB ofshore floating base concepts, which appears highly likely, THE ARMY-MARINES + US AIR ASSETS > will ostensibly need/use some variant of VTOL tech. MOB > AIR > for a practical puirposes, can be ascribed as a FIXED/STATIC CARRIER FLIGHT DECK, wid = widout catapult launch and deck recovery systems e.g. STOBAR??? YTOL. etal. = COST ECONOMIES.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-10-12 19:50||   2007-10-12 19:50|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:40 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:31 Broadhead6
23:28 Swamp Blondie
23:19 Anonymoose
23:11 Broadhead6
23:07 Sherry
22:44 Broadhead6
22:43 Broadhead6
22:37 Broadhead6
22:31 Silentbrick
22:30 Broadhead6
22:27 twobyfour
22:26 mft
22:21 Zenster
22:16 mft
22:06 DMFD
21:50 Zenster
21:28 JosephMendiola
21:15 wxjames
21:10 wxjames
21:06 Nimble Spemble
20:59 wxjames
20:59 Darrell









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com