Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/17/2007 View Mon 07/16/2007 View Sun 07/15/2007 View Sat 07/14/2007 View Fri 07/13/2007 View Thu 07/12/2007 View Wed 07/11/2007
1
2007-07-17 -Lurid Crime Tales-
A very imperfect NA Union for the rich.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2007-07-17 03:09|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Iff I remember correctly, DOUG STEPHEN Show > CANADA will be American in everything except country name and legal sovereignty by 2050, whereupon they'll prob vote to become part of the USA anyway - ditto MEXICO by 2080-2100. JIM BOHANNON Show Pert > Iff the major nations of the world intend to begin exploring deep space, they will need the resources that only OWG and a peaceful world order can provide.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-07-17 03:22||   2007-07-17 03:22|| Front Page Top

#2 Ready the tinfoil hats!
Posted by JSU 2007-07-17 03:48||   2007-07-17 03:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Cue in the 1957 Rome Treaty... start with economical integration and infrastructure convergence, and end happily on the way to a transnational/postnational super-State... all this outside of democratic decision-making and carried out by technocrats and bureacrats bypassing national sovereignty. Do you really need tinfoil hats?
Posted by anonymous5089 2007-07-17 04:52||   2007-07-17 04:52|| Front Page Top

#4 Joe, do you really want a 51st state of Prince Edward Island?
Posted by Eric Jablow">Eric Jablow  2007-07-17 07:17||   2007-07-17 07:17|| Front Page Top

#5 Ya know, I don't like this any more than any other 'burger around here. But, this is happening anyways (at least w/ Mexico) through illegal immigration, so I figure what's the harm in combining w/ Mexico anyways? At least, then we'd have a LOT smaller southern border to patrol.
Posted by BA 2007-07-17 09:08||   2007-07-17 09:08|| Front Page Top

#6 ...so I figure what's the harm in combining w/ Mexico anyways?

Because most of us do NOT want it, and, we don't want it shoved down our throats without consultation!

Is it clearer for you now?
Posted by Natural Law 2007-07-17 09:57||   2007-07-17 09:57|| Front Page Top

#7 Chill, NL. I was saying that "tongue in cheek", my friend! I don't want it either, and I especially don't appreciate the sneaky way it's being done. My point is, parts of America are "little Mexico Cities" already, and if we completely ignoring illegal immigrants anyways, we (ultimately) get the same effect. I don't appreciate either approach to get there, my friend.
Posted by BA 2007-07-17 10:15||   2007-07-17 10:15|| Front Page Top

23:58 Verlaine
23:47 Eric Jablow
23:45 Zenster
23:41 ed
23:41 Zenster
23:39 Phinater Thraviger
23:18 Verlaine
23:13 Super Hose
22:57 Zenster
22:45 Anonymoose
22:38 BA
22:37 Super Hose
22:36 W.O.P.R.
22:30 Super Hose
22:23 Super Hose
22:23 Sherry
22:17 Raider Ray
22:08 Odysseus
21:59 Super Hose
21:54 Super Hose
21:40 JosephMendiola
21:31 JosephMendiola
21:28 Mike N.
21:25 WTF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com