Article

2006-11-14 Terror Networks

Iran plotting to groom bin Laden's successor

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-11-14 10:51|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 So the Daily Telegraph thinks Tehran might not be serious with Blair?

And they think the Sunni jihadists are gonna jump onboard a Shia - Qom dominated version of alQ?

Wowsers, ya can't slip anything past these guys.

Posted by .com 2006-11-14 12:04|| 2006-11-14 12:04|| Front Page Top

#2 what's more of a wish

- that Iran would help Britain and the US in Iraq or

- that Iran would succeed taking over Al Q

Posted by mhw 2006-11-14 12:29|| http://hypocrisy-incorporated.blogspot.com/]">[http://hypocrisy-incorporated.blogspot.com/] 2006-11-14 12:29|| Front Page Top

#3 More of those "unknown unknowns", methinks.

Posted by .com 2006-11-14 12:32|| 2006-11-14 12:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Well, if Iran succeeds in taking over Al Qaeda, and AQ does something big to the US or its allies, then Iran is a sponsor, and thus responsible...does anybody see where I'm going with this?

Posted by Jonathan">Jonathan 2006-11-14 12:45|| 2006-11-14 12:45|| Front Page Top

#5 Time for some glass making.

Posted by Icerigger 2006-11-14 12:47|| 2006-11-14 12:47|| Front Page Top

#6 I'll bet the DhimmiDonks will need some help with that, Jonathan... They have this ignore it, mebbe it'll go away approach to reality. Prolly congenital, so we can't blame the poor darlings, of course.

Posted by .com 2006-11-14 12:54|| 2006-11-14 12:54|| Front Page Top

#7 "to groom bin Laden's successor"

I have this mental image of the mullahs sitting around picking lice out of some mook's hair. Kinda like the monkeys do.

Posted by Chuck Simmins">Chuck Simmins 2006-11-14 12:57|| http://northshorejournal.org]">[http://northshorejournal.org] 2006-11-14 12:57|| Front Page Top

#8 Since when has Labour served Kool Aid at official functions?

Posted by doc 2006-11-14 13:05|| 2006-11-14 13:05|| Front Page Top

#9 Iff the numbers of subordinate henchmen = appratchiks being killed or captured is any measure, Osama & Sons/Sons-in-law are gonna be around for awhile yet.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-11-14 20:50|| 2006-11-14 20:50|| Front Page Top

#10 this redeployment they keep talking about... perhaps it could be through Qom and on to Tehran?

Posted by eLarson 2006-11-14 21:48|| http://larsonian.blogspot.com]">[http://larsonian.blogspot.com] 2006-11-14 21:48|| Front Page Top

#11 Exactly, eLarson. And, (as before the election), I've gotta ask...Why this article NOW? WTF is up with the MSM? It's almost as if they had all these "bad" stories waiting until the day after the election to make President Bush look bad.

Crucifying Rummy, then next, talks of surrender, then Ahamdinijad spouting off that they're "almost done" with the nuclear weapons, then North Korea spouts off, then Japan says it's (almost) ready to go nuclear, and now, Iran is grooming binny's successors? All this gloom and doom, did they NOT get the memo that Shi'as and Sunnis can't work together (a'la Iraq), or that the Secularists (Saddam) can't work with the Fundies (al Qaeda)? Someone needs to pound these fools hard, and the average American Joe even harder for following these MSM convoluted/non-logical stories. Jeebus, I'm so pissed off, I think I may start typing in all caps, like Joe M!

Posted by BA 2006-11-14 23:15|| 2006-11-14 23:15|| Front Page Top

23:57 gromgoru
23:53 CrazyFool
23:53 3dc
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:46 anon
23:45 gromgoru
23:40 pihkalbadger
23:31 Zenster
23:30 pihkalbadger
23:25 pihkalbadger
23:22 BA
23:21 .com
23:20 .com
23:19 pihkalbadger
23:16 Frank G
23:15 Frank G
23:15 BA
23:15 Frank G
23:14 3dc
23:13 Frank G
23:13 wxjames
23:11 pihkalbadger
23:09 Frank G
23:01 .com