Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 09/09/2006 View Fri 09/08/2006 View Thu 09/07/2006 View Wed 09/06/2006 View Tue 09/05/2006 View Mon 09/04/2006 View Sun 09/03/2006
1
2006-09-09 Home Front: WoT
Did the 9/11 hijackers have a U.S. accomplice?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by anonymous5089 2006-09-09 01:35|| || Front Page|| [11134 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 FBI Assistant Director John Miller issued the following statement to NBC News: "At the time of his release, the FBI did not have sufficient evidence to hold charge [Mohdar Abdullah] with a crime.





Posted by Besoeker 2006-09-09 01:54||   2006-09-09 01:54|| Front Page Top

#2 Great, another 9/11 conspiracy, juz in time for the 5th anniversary.
Posted by Captain America 2006-09-09 01:59||   2006-09-09 01:59|| Front Page Top

#3 This all goes back to the Clinton administration and it's makeup being heavy with lawyers, that a crime must be committed before justice.

Read Bush's last speech on what he was asking of Congress. One of the items, was to establish some guidelines for identifying terrorists.

So we no longer have to deal with this "the FBI did not have sufficient evidence to charge ?? with a crime." With this, he is also asking for lots of room to move for our intellgence and our military guys. Setting up rules to be followed, no matter who becomes Pres in 2008. Laying the foundation for fighting this evil before us.

Most folks miss this. Bush knows he leaves in 2 years, and stuff done now, will guide the way for the next decade.
Posted by Sherry">Sherry  2006-09-09 02:07||   2006-09-09 02:07|| Front Page Top

#4 "The problem is that in the paranoid times today, a lot of law enforcement people and Americans think that any Arab, Muslim, or South Asian carrying a video camera is a terrorist up to no good," Hamud says.

Only when they persist in gathering images of soft targets that no other tourists show much interest about. It's not like LAX is a particularly photogenic subject. The serruptitious nature of how the taping was done is a dead give-away. Bring this Yemeni slimeball back for some flame broiling.
Posted by Zenster 2006-09-09 02:52||   2006-09-09 02:52|| Front Page Top

#5 Yes, they had an accomplice: the Visa giftees at the State Department.
Posted by Snease Shaiting3550 2006-09-09 03:54||   2006-09-09 03:54|| Front Page Top

#6 Sherry, it used to be called US foreign policy. It was known as an unstoppable train of War and Peace. The Congrefs would vote on whom our enemies were and a war declaration would be a breath away at anytime after entities were on the list - such as Saddam Hussain. It was mature policy that predates the imbiciles in the democrat party who have decimated a once stable method of deterrence.

Get rid of democrats, and vote on who is and is not an enemy and persue them with vigor, and you will have a safer world immediately.
Posted by newc">newc  2006-09-09 04:30||   2006-09-09 04:30|| Front Page Top

#7 But, but we have no enemies. It's all a BusHitleRovian conspiracy of Unilateral Cowboyism. All we really need to do is reach out to the misunderstood 'Islamists', to our sophisticated allies and let them lead us out of our confusion, to trust in the UN, to submit to our betters, to understand the 'root causes', to accept our guilt as Evil Americans, to end our support for the Evil of Zionism and Jooos, to embrace the Caliphate - for when we end our murderous subjugation of Islamic lands they will magically embrace peace. Don't worry Be Happy.

/Moonbat / Tranzi / Code Pinky Socialist Cooperative
Posted by flyover 2006-09-09 05:13||   2006-09-09 05:13|| Front Page Top

#8 Unilateral Cowboyism

Being the owner of several Stetsons, The Church of Unilateral Cowboyism sounds like a great place to spend a few Sundays.
Posted by Zenster 2006-09-09 05:18||   2006-09-09 05:18|| Front Page Top

#9 Ha! We're hard to fool, Zenster. We know the difference between a religion and an ideology, LOL. Religions don't hold BBQ hoedowns or head-sawing competitions...
Posted by flyover 2006-09-09 06:05||   2006-09-09 06:05|| Front Page Top

#10 Indeed let us remember about war -

S.J.Res.23

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Joint Resolution

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens; and

Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad; and

Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence; and

Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States; and

Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military Force'.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.

(b) War Powers Resolution Requirements-

(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

Not that the Donks, MSM, or SCOTUS want you to remember.
Posted by Glirong Phinert5746 2006-09-09 08:54||   2006-09-09 08:54|| Front Page Top

#11 Has NBC Snewz found the one-armed man yet?
Posted by Captain America 2006-09-09 14:08||   2006-09-09 14:08|| Front Page Top

#12 Did the 9/11 hijackers have a U.S. accomplice?

Certainly. Didn't one of them get cash from the Saudi Ambassador?
Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford  2006-09-09 16:43|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2006-09-09 16:43|| Front Page Top

11:15 bk
23:58 FOTSGreg
23:54 Zenster
23:49 FOTSGreg
23:42 Classical_Liberal
23:40 trailing wife
23:25 Captain America
23:17 Elmomosh Sholush4208
23:09 Zenster
23:03 Zenster
22:18 J. D. Lux
22:16 Zenster
22:13 Frank G
22:07 Bobby
22:03 Zenster
22:00 Barbara Skolaut
21:54 Zenster
21:50 Zenster
21:49 gorb
21:45 Kosik
21:43 Eric Jablow
21:37 Kosik
21:36 mcsegeek1
21:32 mcsegeek1









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com