Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 08/07/2006 View Sun 08/06/2006 View Sat 08/05/2006 View Fri 08/04/2006 View Thu 08/03/2006 View Wed 08/02/2006 View Tue 08/01/2006
1
2006-08-07 Science & Technology
500 Million Years Of Evolution Reversed In Mice
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-08-07 18:34|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Ummmm...I hate to break it to these guys, but mice (and most other mammals) aren't even close to 500 million years old as species.

It was the end of the dinosaurs some 65 million years ago that gave rise to the mammals - theretofore forced to remain small and relatively unassuming (and limited in territory and actual numbers of species) - and allowed the mammal species to differentiate and expand to what we see today.

It's possible that mice might be 65-100 million years old as species, but it's unlikely they've remained what they originally were way back when.

I understand what the article is trying to say, but they're saying it horribly and producing as fact what is merely fancy.

Posted by FOTSGreg">FOTSGreg  2006-08-07 20:12|| www.fire-on-the-suns.com]">[www.fire-on-the-suns.com]  2006-08-07 20:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Essentialy, as Mario says, the BBC forgot to give al Rooters the photo credit, essentialy on the mouse. (FOTSGreg nails the time line error.) Grant money available?
Posted by Inspector Clueso 2006-08-07 21:07||   2006-08-07 21:07|| Front Page Top

#3 Well, there is a major difference between evolution of a species on the macro level and evolution of a protien and the gene(s) which encode it.

Basically, this is very true at a genetic / protien level.

This is something that confuses many people, the difference between molecular evolution and evolution. The article is essentially correct in what it is saying.

Many genes can stay un-evolved for millions of years while others can change at amazing rates.

Again, the difference between protien evolution and evolution of a species.
Posted by bombay">bombay  2006-08-07 21:51||   2006-08-07 21:51|| Front Page Top

23:49 gorb
23:47 trailing wife
23:27 ryuge
22:33 DMFD
22:22 tipper
22:18 Barbara Skolaut
22:12 SteveS
22:12 bombay
22:05 Alaska Paul
21:53 Alaska Paul
21:51 bombay
21:48 BA
21:48 gorb
21:46 Manolo
21:40 DarthVader
21:22 Nimble Spemble
21:20 Snease Shaiting3550
21:14 bombay
21:11 bombay
21:07 Inspector Clueso
21:04 BA
20:58 CrazyFool
20:57 Zenster
20:55 voter









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com