Article

2006-07-03 Fifth Column

National Review on The Man Who Invented Fidel

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-07-03 13:26|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Herbert L. Matthews of The New York Times

NYT? What a surprise - you could knock me over with freight train.

Posted by Xbalanke 2006-07-03 14:45|| 2006-07-03 14:45|| Front Page Top

#2 In other words he was a crypto-communist (let's remember that teh FBI identified only a hundred of the eight hundred agents mentionned in teh small part of the soviet traffic the FBi was able to decipher.

I know it from the fact he supported the Spanish Republic. Because this was no longer a democracy (in case it ever was) and its governemnt had not been democratically elected. I will pass over the fact that none of its formations supported democracy be it the anarchists, the communists or the socialists who unlike everywhere else in Europe had not renounced to establish a dictatorship supposedly of the proletariat. In fact the only thing who separated Spanish socialists from communists was the question of subordination to Moscow

I will pass over how when the right had been elected in 1933, riots and threats impeded it to lead the governement, I will pass over the failed attempt of a leftist coup in 1934. In early 1936, there were new elections and the left basing on the first recounts (ie the big cities whare it had majority) proclamied itself winner and rioted so violently that the leaving government members fearing for their lives resigned and handled power to the Popular Front coalition before the recount was ended. Then the leftists stole the ballot boxes everywhere where recounts were still not finished (ie in zones whree they would have probably lost). In fact the Republic never published the definitive results.

And then the left began to govern and militants of right wings partys were being assassinated. Then Calvo Sotelo the leader of one of the opposition parties was assassinated while only luck preserved two other in what appears as a coordinated attempt of decapitate the opposition. Two days later the army raised. Now I am not saying th coup had not been in gestation for weeks before I only highlight the fact thet the sitation was:

-The opposition parties had no hope of ever returning to power through elections since the left would cheat like it had done in February (BTW the Socialist leader had told: we will remain in power forever) or would be rioted out of power in case they would ever win like in 1933

-Soon or later the pro-government death squads would kidnap and kill them like for Calvo Sotelo (or socialists would openly declare dictatorship and then it would be the police but on a larger scale)

Now about the rebels. Contrary to legend set by Mr Matthews and others, most rebels werfe not fascists. The Falange (Spanish Fascist Party) was only a tiny part of them. The remainder was either for a truly democratic republic, constitutioanl monarchists or requetes (ie partisans of traditionalist non-Constitutional monarchy) plus catholics aggravated by religious perseecution. However the coup failed and degenrated in civil war. This favored a general Franco who was not even in the original junta but who happened to have bty far, more troops than any other rebel general. It also favoured those who could count on support (ie money and weapons) from outside ie Falange and Communists respectively, plus teh fact that the massacres ion both sides favoured the hard liners (again Falange and Communists).

But I repaat in 1936 the rebels are not a fascist movement (Falange would grew later but even in 1939n it was only one of componet in an alliance of rebel movements that Franco played one against the other).

Also the Republican governnt sent all of Spain's gold to Moscow as a payment in advance for Soviet war supplies. Of course when German and Soviet relations began to warm (several months before the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact) the Soviets alleged the Sapnish government had outspent its credit, kkept the gold and stopped shipping arms to the "Republicans".

Now what can we think about a guy who propagandizes for a regime who was in fact a dictatorship and who had given all the country's gold to Stalin?

Posted by JFM">JFM 2006-07-03 17:03|| 2006-07-03 17:03|| Front Page Top

#3 Don't forget the NYT's Raymond Bonner, who in the 1980s tried to do for the FDR and FMLN in El Salvador what Matthews did for Fidel and the 26th July Movement in Cuba back in the 1950s.

The Reagan State Department exerted much pressure and got Bonner booted out of El Salvador before that rat fink could do his evil deed.

Posted by Lancasters Over Dresden 2006-07-03 21:15|| http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com/HomePage.asp]">[http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com/HomePage.asp] 2006-07-03 21:15|| Front Page Top

19:18 Fur Trapper
00:13 Snirt Jesh4074
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:41 KBK
23:38 Frank G
23:28 trailing wife
23:28 DarthVader
23:28 Slimble Thomorong2242
23:27 Frank G
23:26 Classical_Liberal
23:26 2b
23:26 JosephMendiola
23:25 2b
23:22 trailing wife
23:14 JosephMendiola
23:08 2b
23:04 trailing wife
23:02 trailing wife
23:01 Inspector Clueso
22:57 2b
22:57 JosephMendiola
22:56 Seafarious
22:55 Abdominal Snowman