Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 04/22/2006 View Fri 04/21/2006 View Thu 04/20/2006 View Wed 04/19/2006 View Tue 04/18/2006 View Mon 04/17/2006 View Sun 04/16/2006
1
2006-04-22 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran's war on the West
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2006-04-22 04:51|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 This isn't at all suprising, anyone with half a brain knows Simon and Clarke have an axe to grind.
The fact that they wrote the op-ed for the NY fishwrap/bird cage liner should clue you into that. I didn't notice this past week but I'm sure al-Rueters must have been all over this.
Posted by JerseyMike 2006-04-22 07:36||   2006-04-22 07:36|| Front Page Top

#2 "Clarke explained that the threat posed by Iran... far greater than Saddam's Iraq."

Yep. But a direct attack on Iran was not possible logistically or politically. Iraq was a pragmatic stepping stone.
Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore  2006-04-22 10:11||   2006-04-22 10:11|| Front Page Top

#3 Iran has not supported anti-American terrorism since the mid-1990s. Bull#&(t!!

Before we do anything to Iran we need to decide that we must go to total war with them. This measured approach has done nothing when it comes to eastern mindsets. Iraq, Palistine, Afghanistan, the PI, and the rest of the war are shining examples of how measured approached don't work. To defeat an enemy you must destroy their will to fight, as a nation, or destroy that nation and break it up into smaller states.
Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan  2006-04-22 11:40||   2006-04-22 11:40|| Front Page Top

#4 Before we do anything to Iran we need to decide that we must go to total war with them.

Hear! Hear!
I don't think our kinsmen are anywhere near there.
Posted by 6 2006-04-22 13:34||   2006-04-22 13:34|| Front Page Top

#5 the IRAN war is going to be a mess, my prediction, but what choice do we have
Posted by Sholung Hupomoque1398 2006-04-22 14:14||   2006-04-22 14:14|| Front Page Top

#6 "Iran has not supported anti-American terrorism since the mid-1990s."
They totally discredited themselves right there.
Posted by Darrell 2006-04-22 17:33||   2006-04-22 17:33|| Front Page Top

#7 what choice do we have

Conventional or nuclear. Would you like fries with that?
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-04-22 18:38||   2006-04-22 18:38|| Front Page Top

#8 WORLDTRIBUNE.com has an article rtaken from Radio Liberty Europe where a US official claims Iran may already have accumulated enough gases and other materials for 10 bombs. WorldTribune also has an article from INTERFAX claiming that Russian T-160 heavy bombers had penetrated Canadian airspace.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-04-22 22:52||   2006-04-22 22:52|| Front Page Top

00:02 Oldspook
23:54 Eric Jablow
23:42 RD
23:32 RD
23:12 3dc
23:01 mojo
23:01 3dc
22:57 49 Pan
22:55 Frank G
22:53 Frank G
22:53 Oldspook
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:47 Frank G
22:46 Oldspook
22:43 Frank G
22:38 JosephMendiola
22:36 Lone Ranger
22:35 Danielle
22:34 Oldspook
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:19 Oldspook
22:09 3dc
22:04 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)
22:01 Steve White









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com