Article

2005-12-09 Afghanistan

Al-Qaeda, Taliban defeated in Afghanistan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-12-09 01:54|| || Front Page|| [11128 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I don't get it.

Al Q and the Taliban are down but not out. The CFCommand still must remain. The only thing different from a year ago or two years ago is the govt. is stronger but not strong enough for us to reduce forces.

Also, the progressives among the Afghans are a relatively thin layer. Yes the population is well off compared to the Taliban years but typical Islamic bigotry, anti-women culture, etc. still dominates in the rural areas and small towns.

Posted by mhw 2005-12-09 06:30|| 2005-12-09 06:30|| Front Page Top

#2 Until the funding is cut off, there will still be madrassahs and imams cranking out deluded dimwit bottom-feeders. When the cash stops, so will most of this pipeline. I believe the True Believers running the show represent less than 10% - and their recruiting pool, full of hormone-crazed dingbats, is also mebbe 10% True Believers. The romantic BS of being a warrior against the infidels, flitting about the globe in 1st class, yaddaÂ³, goes *poof* when the cash dries up. The ideological implacability becomes irrelevant when they're stuck in goatfuckland, unarmed, unfeted, untrained, and unloved. Then I think they just explode, lol. My quickie 2Â¢ take, anyway.

Posted by .com 2005-12-09 08:40|| 2005-12-09 08:40|| Front Page Top

#3 Topographical map of Afghanistan (note passes into Pakistan) :

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/afghanistan_topo86.jpg

Ethnographic map:

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/afghanistan_ethnoling_97.jpg

Posted by Anonymoose 2005-12-09 10:07|| 2005-12-09 10:07|| Front Page Top

#4 Right on, .com. It's the money that runs the show. We have to stop the flow of funding, and the money trail leads back to Saudi Arabia for the most part. If we do not deal with the funding situation, then we are dealing with the problem symptomatically and are basically fighting the enemy that is financed by our own oil money.

Posted by Alaska Paul">Alaska Paul 2005-12-09 11:07|| 2005-12-09 11:07|| Front Page Top

#5 I don't get it.

Means one can't do a slap-dash, half-assed job in Afghanistan. It will take time, a long-term view, patience. The latter two which seem to be in very short supply.

Posted by Pappy 2005-12-09 11:10|| 2005-12-09 11:10|| Front Page Top

#6 And the best way to stop the money from flowing is to stop buying the oil. And to stop buying the oil we have to have an alternative energy source. At this point there is only one that is readily available and chipper than oil and that's nuclear power. I just wonder why our government fails to see it and does not show much needed leadership in building more nuclear plants.

Posted by wonderer 2005-12-09 13:08|| 2005-12-09 13:08|| Front Page Top

#7 And the best way to stop the money from flowing is to stop buying the oil. And to stop buying the oil we have to have an alternative energy source.

Ahem. There are other ways. We at Rantburg have discussed this before. It involves a 50 km wide strip of land ...

Posted by Steve White">Steve White 2005-12-09 17:03|| 2005-12-09 17:03|| Front Page Top

#8 It does very little good if we stop buying oil, unless we can get China, India, and everyone else to do so, also.

Posted by Jackal">Jackal 2005-12-09 17:38|| home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html] 2005-12-09 17:38|| Front Page Top

#9 India, China and everyone else are buying the oil out of necessity and if we go that way they might follow. It will also require mass production of plug-in hybrids or hydrogen cars (enorgy to produce the hydrogen will come from nuclear plants of course).
Decoupling ourselves from oil will allow us to use the full spectrum of strategic options in the world dealings. Today despite of our economic and military might we are very limited in our ability to act be it Venesuela, Iran or Saudis.
Producing nuclear energy will increase the U.S. employment, reduce trade deficit, deprive our enimies of revenue, will continie our technological advances in nuclear energy field, will reduce terrorism financing, will save american lives and all of it without tarnishing our image. It's win-win-win-win-win proposition.

Posted by wonderer 2005-12-09 17:57|| 2005-12-09 17:57|| Front Page Top

#10 Hell, I'm with wonderer.

Posted by Shipman 2005-12-09 19:28|| 2005-12-09 19:28|| Front Page Top

#11 Pollyanna's Picnic is rained out. So sorry. And what are those large nasty-tasting lumps in the potato salad?

Pfeh. Simple-minded pooftas. Where is that damned MaGiK Wand when you want it?

Posted by .Capn Bringdown 2005-12-09 19:49|| 2005-12-09 19:49|| Front Page Top

00:01 Rafael
23:52 Bomb-a-rama
23:35 Jan
23:30 Frank G
23:07 Babs
23:03 Gravirt Flineth9460
22:56 Mahou Sensei Negi-bozu
22:46 Aris Katsaris
22:28 Zenster
22:04 Zhang Fei
21:59 bruce
21:53 lotp
21:22 Red Dog
21:20 Bomb-a-rama
21:20 Remoteman
21:18 Asymmetrical Triangulation
21:10 Bomb-a-rama
21:08 badanov
21:07 Mark Z.
21:05 Red Dog
21:01 Redneck Jim
20:55 Frank G
20:48 head spinning
20:47 JosephMendiola